| Political Cohort |
Sex |
No Racial Pref |
White |
Asian |
Black |
Hisp |
| NP |
F |
37.7% |
47.5% |
6.6% |
0.0% |
4.9% |
| VL |
F |
47.2% |
36.5% |
3.4% |
3.9% |
3.4% |
| L |
F |
38.7% |
46.2% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
3.5% |
| LB |
F |
35.1% |
55.4% |
2.7% |
1.4% |
1.4% |
| M |
F |
32.5% |
55.0% |
2.5% |
2.5% |
2.5% |
| C |
F |
20.4% |
68.6% |
3.7% |
1.5% |
2.2% |
| VC |
F |
14.6% |
75.0% |
0.0% |
2.1% |
2.1% |
| NP |
M |
40.7% |
35.7% |
15.7% |
1.4% |
2.9% |
| VL |
M |
32.1% |
35.8% |
15.5% |
1.6% |
3.4% |
| L |
M |
37.8% |
39.9% |
12.7% |
2.1% |
4.5% |
| LB |
M |
29.2% |
46.7% |
12.2% |
2.8% |
4.4% |
| M |
M |
31.7% |
49.5% |
11.5% |
1.4% |
3.7% |
| C |
M |
20.5% |
59.9% |
10.0% |
0.5% |
6.2% |
| VC |
M |
17.0% |
70.0% |
6.7% |
0.9% |
4.0% |
The
Races Whites are Most Attracted To
(NP=Nonpolitical,VL=Very Liberal, L=Liberal, LB=Libertarian,M=Moderate,
C=Conservative, VC=Very Conservative) (F=Female, M=Male)
Races Whites are Most Attracted To
(NP=Nonpolitical,VL=Very Liberal, L=Liberal, LB=Libertarian,M=Moderate,
C=Conservative, VC=Very Conservative) (F=Female, M=Male)
Another observation: "In general, the more liberal a white male is, the more likely they will indicate they are physically attracted to Asians."
From a different article on the same page:
In 2005, we had speculated that the testosterone-estrogen ratios of Liberal males and females were closer to each other than the Conservative males and females, who were more skewed towards either the testosterone or estrogen sides of the scale, respectively. This proposal is looking more reasonable today. [. . .](Note: I don't believe "low-testosterone males" contributed disproportionately to science and technology. The opposite seems more likely to be true.)
Our current evidence indicates that white Liberal males are less likely to pass on their genes than are the white Conservative males, as the Conservatives report higher rates of both pair-bonding and heterosexual sex. Further, this tendency is exacerbated among Caucasians, as the white females, on average, are more likely to mate with Conservative males than with Liberal males.
However, all is not lost for the Liberal males. Liberal females heavily apply political and religious cues in mate selection, and have a strong preference for Liberal males, and seem to be more averse to prominent androgen features in mate selection. The rise of the low-testosterone male, so instrumental in the development of science, technology, and the arts, has been highly reliant on a subpopulation of females keeping them in the mating game.
485 comments:
1 – 200 of 485 Newer› Newest»Who is the fairest of them all? Race, attractiveness and skin color sexual dimorphism.
Abstract
Previous research has suggested that perceived attractiveness and personality are affected by the race such that White faces are more attractive but less masculine than Black faces. Such studies, however, have been based on very small stimulus sets. The current study investigated perceived attractiveness and personality for 600 Black, White and mixed-race faces. Many of the investigated personality traits were correlated with race when rated by White participants. Attractiveness specifically was greater for Black male faces than White male faces and among mixed-race faces. Blackness correlated with increased attractiveness. A reverse pattern was found for female faces with Whiteness being associated with attractiveness. The results are discussed in terms of the sexual dimorphism demonstrated in skin color.
The raters were white college students. Women rated men's pictures, and vice versa. This seems to be in line with Peter Frost's thinking.
That same researcher, using the same technique, claimed earlier this year mixed-race people were more attractive and blacks and whites were of comparable attractiveness (for both males and females). Obviously, both studies can't be right.
The sample photos are of facebook users in Britain. The author implies the photos selected are representative of their respective races, but there's no reason to believe they are. There's little reason to believe African immigrants to Britain are representative of Africans, or that within Britain blacks who use facebook and join the particular groups from which the photos were selected are representative of British blacks in general (or that the selected white facebook users are representative, for that matter).
Lastly, a black or mixed-race person who is rated as attractive is being rated with respect to other blacks or other mixed-race people. Usually, on ratings of this sort, the average for each race will come out about the same. But this does not mean whites actually behave like they find members of different races to be of anywhere near comparable attractiveness to opposite sex members of their own race.
Also, from the paper: "One explanation for the results found in the current experiment
is that they represent an over-compensation as a result of prejudice
avoidance. The participants may wish to avoid appearing prejudiced
and so rate other-race faces as being more positive."
NON-LIBERALS
-- 91.2% of white-females of the Libertarian, Moderate, Conservative, and Very-Conservative bloc who stated a preference prefer whites. [rising to 95% for very-conservatives].
-- 77.9% is the same figure for non-liberal white-males. [This rises to 80.0% when you exclude Libertarians, and to 86% for Very-Conservatives].
ORIENTALS
-- 25.6% of Liberal, Very-Liberal and 'Non-Political' white males who state a preference say they prefer Orientals.
--10.6% is the same figure for Conservative and Very-Conservative white-males.
[These figures are derived from dividing White/(100-[No-Preference]-[No-Answer]). I assumed each political-grouping to be equal in size. They did not publish sample sizes for each grouping. Here is a screenshot of my work to duplicate these results.]
91.2% of white-females of the Libertarian, Moderate, Conservative, and Very-Conservative bloc who stated a preference prefer whites.
Note also that this grouping is having the great bulk of the white children.
The white-liberal bloc probably has a TFR closer to 1.0, vs. Moderate/Conservatives probably 2.0 --
Imagine a USA microcosm of
100 white women
33 liberal
67 moderate/conservative
Liberals produce 33 babies (1.0 TFR)
Mod/Cons produce 134 babies (2.0 TFR)
The new generation has 167 people, 80% [134] of them born to mod/con mothers.
But how many of these 167 children-of-white-mothers are white?
Mod/Con white women -- when stating a preference -- are saying they want white partners 91.2% of the time; liberal women state "white" only 81.4% of the time.
Of White-female liberals' 33 babies, 26.9 are white.
Of White-female Mod/cons' 134 babies, 122.2 are white.
Thus, the new white generation is 149.1, out of 167 babies to white mothers. So we'd expect 89.3% of babies produced by white women to be white (i.e., both parents white).
Addendum: I finished working this out and remembered an old thread about this very subject. The figure derived here is, amazingly, exactly the same as the other, which is from actual records: this study.
They also studied religiosity and racial attraction:
"Those whites indicating they were either Atheist, Areligious, Agnostic, or Spiritual were not as physically attracted to whites as the more religious. This trend appears in both genders. The white Atheists had the lowest rates of physical attraction for other whites, again in both genders.
Male elevated preference for Asians was highest in the Atheist, Areligious, Agnostic, and Spiritual cohorts. It was lowest in the Very Religious cohorts."
I've made a table of the findings.
"As expected, "white females were more attracted to whites than are white males"."
If this study was broken down it would probably show that white females were more attracted not just to white males but specifically more attracted to white males from Romance-speaking countries.
Peter Frost has shown this:
http://www.amazon.com/Fair-Women-Dark-Men-Forgotten/dp/1877275727
If this study was broken down it would probably show that white females were more attracted not just to white males but specifically more attracted to white males from Romance-speaking countries.
LOL. You'll forgive us if we don't take your mendaciously Med-slanted agitprop/"pop science" too seriously.
Generally Nords are more attractive because we are taller, stronger, and more masculine than our disadvantaged and racially-mixed cousins to the south. And no amount of your nonsense will change that fact.
There is one thing that White women can't stand and it's guys who are shorter and more feminine than them, so you will excuse me if I laugh up at the picturing of your fantasy world were 6'6" White females hook up with some 5'3" metrosexual swarthoids.
Does *every* thread really have to turn into this kind of inane trolling?
Does *every* thread really have to turn into this kind of inane trolling?
I agree, I really do not see why even such a thread would have to be turned unto trolling ground for the "meds" and their deeply rootd narcissism, especially since this thread does not even revolves around them as this was a study conducted on Whites to reveal how political orientation influences the WASP physical attraction they may or may not have for other races.
Does that mean that meds, view themselves as belonging to another race than White? Seems this way, as post number 7 just demonstrated.
"LOL. You'll forgive us if we don't take your mendaciously Med-slanted agitprop/"pop science" too seriously."
Peter Frost is Nordish and a scientist.
If you want 'pop science' there's this:
"European men with darker, sultry features from countries like Spain, Italy, Portugal, and France" are most attractive
http://www.rooshv.com/totem-pole-of-race-attractiveness
This is one case where science and 'pop science' converge on the same fundamental truth.
"Generally Nords are more attractive because we are taller, stronger, and more masculine than our disadvantaged and racially-mixed cousins to the south. And no amount of your nonsense will change that fact."
Brock Lesnar is taller and stronger than Cain Velasquez (who of course is mestizo but his Mediterranean heritage is only relevant here as that is obviously what gives him his masculinity and fighting prowess, not his Amerindian heritage), but he's obviously not more masculine, seeing as how Cain Velasquez beat the shit out of him and made him look like a complete pussy.
"Does that mean that meds, view themselves as belonging to another race than White? Seems this way, as post number 7 just demonstrated."
No it doesn't. I said 'white males from Romance-speaking countries.'
"Anonymous said...
No it doesn't. I said 'white males from Romance-speaking countries.'"
And we are supposed to believe this nonsense when you yourself just used Cain Velasquez a Mexican as an exemplar of a masculine and strong mediterranean? More like muditerranean...
But good to see you have no racial standards whatsoever, which is not unexpected coming from a muditerranean.
Similarly:
http://s1.zetaboards.com/anthroscape/topic/3894158/
Mudicism in all of it's glory!
http://racehist.blogspot.com/2010/09/assortative-mating-by-ancestry-among.html
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gLUp6IxaD-jYaonJYzk_iCeuGrzg
Italian 'latin lover' falls flat with tourists: poll
(AFP) – Aug 1, 2010
ROME — Italy's fabled "Latin lovers" are missing the mark with foreign belles, according to a poll released on Sunday that said nearly four in five women tourists were unmoved by Italian men's charms.
Seventy-nine percent said they would not fall for an Italian, with many saying they lacked cheerfulness and a sense of humour (51 percent), while others complained they were childish (49 percent).
Another reason for the lack of attraction is that today's Italian men show more of their feminine than their masculine side, according to 57 percent of the 1,000 women polled by tourist and gastronomy magazine Vie del Gusto.
"And we are supposed to believe this nonsense when you yourself just used Cain Velasquez a Mexican as an exemplar of a masculine and strong mediterranean?"
You're an idiot.
The point was that his Mediterranean heritage, not his Amerindian heritage, is what gave him his fighting prowess and made him masculine, much more masculine than Brock Lesnar. If he was full Mediterranean he would have surely beat the shit out of him even more, embarrassed him even more, made him look even more like a giant pussy. Instead of just being a bloody, pussified pulp, Brock would probably be paralyzed or in a coma.
BTW, Rassenhygayfucker, it's laughable that you expect us to believe that you're British when your comments are littered with grammatical and spelling errors and awkward constructions.
If he was full Mediterranean he would have surely beat the shit out of him even more
Just the way Frank Mur did, Medginald?
"Anonymous said...
The point was that his Mediterranean heritage, not his Amerindian heritage, is what gave him his fighting prowess and made him masculine, much more masculine than Brock Lesnar. If he was full Mediterranean he would have surely beat the shit out of him even more, embarrassed him even more, made him look even more like a giant pussy. Instead of just being a bloody, pussified pulp, Brock would probably be paralyzed or in a coma."
Yeah sure, the guy is Indianid and quite a typical one at that.
He even has "BROWN PRIDE" tattoed on his chest:
http://img295.imageshack.us/img295/9674/r108r108.jpg
What is wrong? Is the muditerranean race so pathetic that you would have to resort in choosing a Mexican Indianid as a representant of the medish race?
Meds are known for being physically and mentally effeminate with weak muscles, small bones, small weight, short height, with an overall gracile and feminine-like facial countenance.
____________________________________
"Anonymous said...
BTW, Rassenhygayfucker, it's laughable that you expect us to believe that you're British when your comments are littered with grammatical and spelling errors and awkward constructions."
Oh dear sire, would you be kind enough to point out those "grammatical and spelling errors and awkward constructions."
In all my years in England, Scotland and America not once have I been told about any of those "grammatical and spelling errors and awkward constructions." which you and your fellow swarthoids seem so bent on discussing, yet never pointing them out for some reasons...
Neither such a case has ever happened on the internet foras, in discussions with fellow Northwestern Europeans. Peculiar enough the subject of those "grammatical and spelling errors and awkward constructions." always seem to come out when I post on internet foras/blogs where the general posting population is of dubious racial lineage, makes you wonder, hum?
By the way, you misspelled my username, not that I would hold it out against you.
When he isn't breeding with horses or fantasizing about being a polygamous rapist, Mudginald is chimping out on racialist websites.
"http://racehist.blogspot.com/2010/09/assortative-mating-by-ancestry-among.html"
This is from the Framingham Heart Study, which started 60 years ago.
The main factors to consider here are relative population and geography. Northern Euros outnumbered Southern Euros and were in different areas. But even still the pattern emerged:
From the comments:
"There appear to be roughly 3 clusters: a relatively tight cluster of Northern Euro wives and NE husbands, and 2 looser clusters of SE wives/SE husbands, and NE wives/SE husbands."
I'm sure this pattern has strengthened over time. Over the years more and more Northern Euro males have had to remain virgins, become gay, or seek Asian wives.
I would not be surprised if this trend continues and that in the future Southern Euro patrilines dominate not just in historically Southern Euro populations but in virtually all white populations as well.
It is not as though families can or will stop it. Northern Euro fathers are just relieved it's not a black when their daughters bring home Southern Euro males.
Northern Euro patrilines are likely to go extinct or exist in Asia.
In other news, while I was googling "swarthoid", I came across this blog:
"Accidental Dissent - An irreverent look at race and society."
http://accidentaldissent.wordpress.com
Mudginald personal blog?
"Accidental Dissent - An irreverent look at race and society."
http://accidentaldissent.wordpress.com
Mudginald personal blog?
That's Silver.
http://statsaholic.blogspot.com
This is Reginald's blog.
Mudginald is a Portuguese pervert who's obsessed with rape and polygamy.
Mudginald revealed his actual identity and posted photos of himself. His photos showed he has a very distinct negroid strain.
He's prone to violent outbursts. One time he threatened to "smash the face" of someone he disagreed with.
Mudginald also has frequent fits of rage in which he reveals his true feelings and his desire for the genocide of Northern Europeans. He said Northern Europeans "deserve the gas chamber" and he looks forward to their "annihilation from the face of the earth." Mudginald also said he wishes millions of English women had been raped by the Red Army.
"Anonymous said...
His photos showed he has a very distinct negroid strain."
Just like diabloblanco, Dienekes, Racial Reality and all the other "proud" nationalist swarthoids who refuse to live anywhere else but in Germanic countries.
The United States of America really is getting the biggest dregs from Southern Europe, the most anti-Nordish individuals are typically the blackest and dumbest immigrants that Southern Europe has to offer.
____________________________________
"Anonymous said...
Mudginald also said he wishes millions of English women had been raped by the Red Army."
That is quite the typical line actually, heard it off a few time already on various forums (especially Stormfront but also on various other blogs and pseudo-racialist forums such as apricity, anthrocivitas and such) from swarthoids that it be either from Southwestern Europe (Spain, Portugal) and Southeastern Europe (Balkans, Fyrom).
The point was that his Mediterranean heritage, not his Amerindian heritage, is what gave him his fighting prowess and made him masculine, much more masculine than Brock Lesnar.
Clearly you're the idiot if you're using a mestizo to represent Mediterranean masculinity, and this isn't the first time you've done this, Reginaldo. You should let Cain and all of his Latino, "brown pride" mestizo buddies know that they're actually Mediterranean White and that's why he succeeded, because they all seem to think it's their brown Amerindian heritage. Cain has an "Aztec spiritual advisor."
Considering almost no White Mediterraneans have achieved anything of note in MMA, there's no evidence that mestizo success stems from their Latin ancestry.
Frank Mir is also mixed, but more Mediterranean than Cain, and he lost horribly.
The reason Lesnar lost is because he has much less experience and training than Cain. Masculinity was not a deciding factor. Technique trumps power.
The reason Lesnar lost is because he has much less experience and training than Cain. Masculinity was not a deciding factor. Technique trumps power.
The fact that Lesnar was completely pummeled and made to look like a giant pussy suggests that masculinity and toughness were deciding factors.
Perhaps if it was a long, drawn-out technical match then you might have had a case.
But it wasn't.
Personally, I don't care for Cain Velasquez but the point was that his Mediterranean heritage is what gave him his fighting prowess and made him much more masculine than Brock Lesnar.
That is quite the typical line actually, heard it off a few time already on various forums (especially Stormfront but also on various other blogs and pseudo-racialist forums such as apricity, anthrocivitas and such) from swarthoids that it be either from Southwestern Europe (Spain, Portugal) and Southeastern Europe (Balkans, Fyrom).
Do you really expect us to believe that you are "British" when you write English like this?
Speaking of *genetic deterioration* of modern populations, here is a great example of the modern day:
One Quarter Of English Children Are Obese
As English children enter adulthood the number of people with diabetes (type II) is set to explode. A much larger proportion of the adult population will be facing serious cardiovascular disease. Incidences of cancer will rise. These are all possible consequences of having more obese adults. Further down the road, if the obesity problem is not addressed long-term, life expectancy will probably go down significantly when these children reach their sixties and seventies.
Is it the food, lack of exercise, something else or a combination of factors? People in England consume fewer calories per day today than fifty years ago. But people were much thinner then. People were much more physically active 50 years ago. Junk food was not so common. Fizzy drinks laden with sugar were not so regularly consumed. Perhaps several different factors have to be addressed if the problem is ever to be successfully dealt with.
*Wonder is our resident friend, the "Germanic" Scot 'Rasse' falls into this category?!
Speaking of 'race and physical attraction'...
Some of the internet warriors here from the UK (and their groupies) better be careful spending too much time online battling the evil plague of 'der ewige swarthoids' better start getting out exercising and swinging their battle axes and Thor's Hammer -- or else their going to get reeel fat with a bad case of diabetes -
Fat British kids raising country's diabetes levels
More overweight and obese (very fat) children in Britain are developing the type of diabetes that usually comes in old age, according to a report published this week.
Eighteen centres across the UK have now reported cases of type 2 diabetes in children, according to the study, and doctors warn that unless action is taken to tackle obesity, there will be an explosion in cases over the next decade.
The first cases of type 2 diabetes in children in the UK were diagnosed three years ago by Birmingham Children's Hospital, whose researchers produced the new study. If growth rates of the disease continue, type 2 diabetes will make up as much as 45 per cent of all new cases of diabetes in children over the next 10 to 15 years.
...
'There is emerging evidence of an appalling outlook for these young people in terms of miscarriages and microvascular and cardiovascular complications, which are likely to present an enormous economic and health services burden over the next 20 years,' says the report, published in the Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, the journal of the Association of Clinical Biochemists. ...
If people of British descent, and Northern Europeans generally, are as despicable and inferior as Mudginald says, why does he go ballistic when we want to separate from him? If he despises Northern Europeans, why wouldn't he be elated to get away from us?
Reginald is a master of dishonesty and duplicity. The swarthoid chauvinists have nothing but hate for Northern Europeans and they want us to go extinct, but these leeches refuse to separate from us. They are no different from negroes or Jews who spew venom toward whites but go ballistic at the prospect of separating from them.
Mudginald is nothing but a parasitic vampire who wants to tear down and feed off of that to which he feels inferior. So are the rest of the swarthoid chauvinists. Their vehement opposition to separation betrays this.
Why don't they want to be around their own people? Why do they insist on clinging to us like leeches? Northern Europeans want nothing more than to be left alone. Swarthoids and negroes want to exploit and destroy us.
Speaking of *genetic deterioration* of modern populations, here is a great example of the modern day:
One Quarter Of English Children Are Obese
Seriously, stop spamming your selective disparagements against the British, as if obesity isn't a problem for other countries. In fact it's worse in some SE countries.
Obesity rates in Italian children are among the highest in Europe. Around a third of boys and girls are classified as obese by the International Association for the Study of Obesity.
Forty-four percent of children in Spain are considered either overweight or obese whereas 45% of children in Italy where are considered overweight or obese.
Statistics released by the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) in March show that Greeks surpass even the supersized
Americans on the scaIes, with 38 percent of Greek women obese or overweight, compared to 34 percent in the US, and over 75 percent of Greek men above the age of 30 overweight, in comparison with 67 percent of overweight or obese males in America. Meanwhile, local surveys have shown that 40 percent of Greek children aged between 9 and 18 are overweight,
- with boys in that age group weighing in at 15 kilos heavier than their counterparts of 20 years ago. The IOTF reports that the number of overweight children in the EU rises by 400,000 each year.
"Northern Europeans want nothing more than to be left alone."
Could you tell me who the president of 'Northern Europe' is, since I cannot find his name or any information on him or his government.
*Additionally, does 'Northern Europe' have a seat in the United Nations, if you by chance know?
Race and ethnicity are not synonymous with nationality retard.
"Anonymous said...
Speaking of *genetic deterioration* of modern populations, here is a great example of the modern day:
*Wonder is our resident friend, the "Germanic" Scot 'Rasse' falls into this category?!"
Obesity is a racial thing prevalent amongst brachycephalic/hyper-brachycephalic/ultra-brachycephalic individuals, mainly Alpinoids, Armenoids, Berids, Baltoids, Sudetids, Assyroids and so many others.
America received a large number of immigrants that were Alipnoids from Southwestern Europe and we can see the result of this uncontrolled immigration today.
Joe Ligotti an Italian-"American" comes to mind:
http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/4905/r112r112.jpg
http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/8918/r113r113.jpg
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/8780/r114r114.jpg
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/7199/r115r115.jpg
http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/8838/r116r116.jpgislat
"Anonymous said...
ROME — Italy's fabled "Latin lovers" are missing the mark with foreign belles, according to a poll released on Sunday that said nearly four in five women tourists were unmoved by Italian men's charms."
An Italian gets on a bus in a Southern city and takes a seat near the front. The bus driver tells him, "Niggers must sit in the back of the bus." The passenger indignantly replies, "I'm not a Nigger, I'm an Italian." Whereupon the driver shouts, "In that case, get off the bus!"
An Italian and a pig were walking down the street and sombody said, "Where'd you get that greasy thing?" And the pig said, "Back at the corner."
Q: What happened to the bridge between italy and Africa?
A: The Niggers tore it down.
Q: What's this (holding hands in surrender position)?
A: The Italians in World War III.
As you can tell by his comments which are littered with grammatical and spelling errors and awkward constructions, "Rassenhygieniker" is not British as he claims, but is actually Polish.
He has gone under the name "Polako" among others.
That's right, he is a dumb Polack, a subhuman Slav masquerading as a Nordicist.
"Anonymous said...
As you can tell by his comments which are littered with grammatical and spelling errors and awkward constructions, "Rassenhygieniker" is not British as he claims, but is actually Polish.
He has gone under the name "Polako" among others.
That's right, he is a dumb Polack, a subhuman Slav masquerading as a Nordicist."
I only post under one username and that is "Rassenhygieniker", I post primarily on Skadi, second would be here and I also made a dozen of posts or so on Stormfront and forumbiodiversity.
Now regarding Poles, well I must say I am not too fond of them due to the high influx of immigrants from Poland that emigrates and emigrated to the British Isles, Western Slavs may not be as racially alien as the swarthoid immigrants from Southern Europe, but they are still racial aliens to the British Islanders as they are pretty easy to spot from the rest of the autochthonous population.
Anyways, regarding Polako I see that swarthoids from anthroscape and you here are saying that he is a "Nordicist", I did read some of his posts on forumbiodiversity back when I briefly posted there and he did not strike me as being a "Nordicist", if anything he is a "Slavicist".
And typically Slavicism is more of an Ural-Altaic ideology, just as Medicism is an Afro-Asiatic ideology, both of which are hostile toward Whites and (Medicism especially) extremely aggressive toward Nordish Preservation.
The only reasons swarthoids say that Polako is a "Nordicist" (even if he clearly is not), is because he says some truths about the mongrel nature of the mediterraneans/middle-easterns/levantines, but that is not "Nordicism", if anything that is just "Anti-Meridionalism" (Oy vey, da posecushion!)
Also Polako posts on forumbiodiversity, which is similar to anthrocivitas in many ways (pseudo-racialist forums filled with non-europeans and european swarthoids/mixed race mongrels), as I said I posted only briefly on forumbiodiversity, but from what I could gather "Polako" is in friendly terms with the moderator of forumbiodiversity "EliasAlucard" (an Iraqi who lives in Sweden).
Though it is funny that you would call slavs "subhumans, but get infuriated and chimpout behind your keyboard when the same is said about muditerraneans.
Rassenhygieniker,
As pointed out in another comment thread, you consistently say "hairs" instead of "hair" (e.g. "black hairs"). This is a common mistake among, for example, Germans who speak English.
What is your native language?
John of Hazelgreen
INTO a sweet May morning,
As the sun clearly shone,
I heard a propper damsell
Making a heavy moan;
Making a heavy moan,
I marvelled what she did mean,
And it was for a gentleman,
Sir John of Hasillgreen.
‘What aileth thee now, bony maid,
To mourn so sore into the tide?
O happy were the man,’ he sayes,
‘That had thee to his bride,
To ly down by his side;
Then he were not to mean;’
But still she let the tears down fall
For pleasant Hasilgreen.
‘Oh what for a man is Hasillgreen?
Sweet heart, pray tell to me.’
‘He is a propper gentleman,
Dwels in the South Countrie;
With shoulders broad and arms long,
And comely to be seen;
His hairs are like the threeds of gold,
My pleasant Hasilgreen.’
C. K. Sharpe
The Garland of Good Will
"His pale lips, alas!
Twenty times she kisséd,
And his face did wash
With her brinish tears;
Every bldding wound
Her fair face bedewed,
Wiping off the blood
With her golden hairs.
["Speak, my love," quoth she,]
"Speak, fair prince, to me;
One sweet word of comfort give;
Lift up thy fair eyes,
Listen to my cries
Think in what great grief I live."
All in vein she sued,
All in vain she wooed,
The prince's life was fled and gone;
There stood she still mourning
'Till the sun's returning,
And bright day was coming on."
Thomas Deloney
To Delia
"When men shall find thy flower, thy glory pass,
And thou, with careful brow, sitting alone,
Received hast this message from thy glass,
That tells the truth, and says that All is gone;
Fresh shalt thou see in me the wounds thou madest,
Though spent thy flame, in me the heat remaining:
I that have loved thee thus before thou fadest,
My faith shall wax, when thou art in thy waning!
The world shall find this miracle in me,
That fire can burn when all the matter's spent:
Then what my faith hath been, thyself shalt see,
And that thou wast unkind, thou may'st repent!
Thou may'st repent that thou hast scorned my tears,
When Winter snows upon thy golden hairs."
Samuel Daniel
Fair Is My love
FAIR is my love, when her fair golden hairs,
With the loose wind ye waving chance to mark;
Fair, when the rose in her red cheeks appears;
Or in her eyes the fire of love does spark.
Fair, when her breast, like a rich-laden bark,
With precious merchandise she forth doth lay;
Fair, when that cloud of pride, which oft doth dark
Her goodly light, with smiles she drives away.
But fairest she, when so she doth display
The gate with pearls and rubies richly dight;
Through which her words so wise do make their way
To bear the message of her gentle sprite.
The rest be works of nature’s wonderment:
But this the work of heart’s astonishment.
Edmund Spenser
I had thought this site was that of M. Rienzi, but surely he would not tolerate the crass Medophobia and Misoslavicism? Or does our Italian-surnamed stud insist that he's the racial reincarnation of Longobard berserkers? LOL.
Those poems you cite that include the usage of "hairs" prove nothing.
It's not just the fact that you use "hairs."
It's that your comments in general are littered with grammatical and spelling errors and awkward constructions.
"Anonymous said...
It's that your comments in general are littered with grammatical and spelling errors and awkward constructions."
You are repeating yourself like a broken record and as result are starting to bore me, shitskin.
Why keep repeating yourself like a parrot when you could instead point out those "grammatical and spelling errors", hum?
Why keep repeating yourself like a parrot when you could instead point out those "grammatical and spelling errors", hum?
There are countless errors, irregularities, and awkward constructions.
Here are just a few from this thread:
"There is one thing that White women can't stand and it's guys who are shorter and more feminine than them, so you will excuse me if I laugh up at the picturing of your fantasy world were 6'6" White females hook up with some 5'3" metrosexual swarthoids."
"I agree, I really do not see why even such a thread would have to be turned unto trolling ground for the "meds" and their deeply rootd narcissism, especially since this thread does not even revolves around them as this was a study conducted on Whites to reveal how political orientation influences the WASP physical attraction they may or may not have for other races."
"That is quite the typical line actually, heard it off a few time already on various forums (especially Stormfront but also on various other blogs and pseudo-racialist forums such as apricity, anthrocivitas and such) from swarthoids that it be either from Southwestern Europe (Spain, Portugal) and Southeastern Europe (Balkans, Fyrom)."
You are not British. You are a mendacious sociopath.
Heh, Rassen constructs sentences better than most Brits do.
(I don't know who or what he is or may be - I'm just sayin')
"Anonymous said...
There are countless errors, irregularities, and awkward constructions.
You are not British. You are a mendacious sociopath."
You are the liar, you kept telling tale tales about "grammatical and spelling errors" and yet the passages which you quoted contained none.
As for "awkward constructions", not everyone learned "English" in the Italian ghettos such as "Little Italy" as you probably did and as they say different strokes for different folks.
____________________________________
"Anonymous said...
Heh, Rassen constructs sentences better than most Brits do.
(I don't know who or what he is or may be - I'm just sayin')"
Well my good man, I assume when you say "Rassen constructs sentences better than most Brits do" that would be a conclusion you have drawn from the experiences you have had with British Islander forumers and not actual interaction with British Islander in real life, whould that be correct?
If that is the case, I would say that all depends on the forums. Typically British Islanders from the Skadi forum write in a similar fashion as I, matter of fact in the year I have spent on Skadi there never has been a single case were "linguistic barriers" had been an issue, that it be with fellow British Islanders, Scandinavians or Central Europeans.
But on other forums that is a whole other story. Take vnnforum for example where at least 70% of the British Isles section is littered with illiterates, bad as it is even their resident Croatian writes better English than they do.
*tall tales
Oh golly, I seem to have made another spelling mistake in the form of a typographical error, I wrote "whould" instead of "would", hurry up and point it out to "get back" at Nordicists.
Nobody, let alone the British, uses the term "British Islander."
You are not fooling anybody by pretending to be British.
You are a pathological liar and a disgusting sociopath.
Those are poems, moron. Thomas Deloney was born in 1543.
Native speakers do not describe people as having "black hairs."
Your native language is not English, troll.
I struck a nerve with my dead-on description of what motivates Mudginald and the swarthoid chauvinists. They know it's true. Their hysterical opposition to separation speaks volumes. It completely betrays them. They can foam at the mouth, talk tough, seethe with anger, and sputter about grammatical errors, but their rabid, unhinged reaction to the prospect of separation says it all.
"I hate you WASPs, now let me into your country you bastards."
I struck a nerve with my dead-on description of what motivates Mudginald and the swarthoid chauvinists. They know it's true. Their hysterical opposition to separation speaks volumes.
"I hate you WASPs, now let me into your country you bastards."
Exactly right, and when you look at North American Indian behavior, the indigenous tribes of SA, then Latinos and Meds, you see that the source of hostility from mestizo Latinos towards Anglo Whites is actually of Mediterranean origin. So when you see all these brown pride mongrels shouting viva la raza and destroying your town this is an extension of the Latin race.
"I hate you WASPs, now let me into your country you bastards."
Or, "Let me into your country, you racist."
Very clever, but not really.
What about people already there? If they've been subjected to racial taunts and found the experience unsettling they just assume "racism" is wrong( a message all major institutions reinforce), not that their presence is wrong. They don't know anything about racial politics.
Rassen would have it that they just want to "profitate" [sic] from Germanic countries, but they don't know anything about that, either; they're just trying to lead a decent life and fit into things as best they can.
Look, I get where you're all coming from and everything. I'm not disputing that. But you're ascribing motives to people that, for the most part, just aren't there. All it does it makes you sound even creepier than you already do. (You, who've been marinading in racialism for years, don't see it, but it strikes the uninitiated as "way out there.")
I struck a nerve with my dead-on description of what motivates Mudginald and the swarthoid chauvinists. They know it's true.
Only the racialist ones.
Racialist meds become unhinged at the thought because they're motivated by the same things you are (essentially, racial revulsion) and are unsettled that some people might feel the same way about them.
These Spaghetti niggers try to change their name to Anthony from Tony but it´s all bullshit, just more dago baloney!
Racialist meds become unhinged at the thought because they're motivated by the same things you are.
No, they're not, that's clear enough.
"Anonymous said...
Nobody, let alone the British, uses the term "British Islander."
Well I use it, it's my way of saying "Nordish", but only as to encompass autochthonous individuals from the British Isles.
Similarly like people use the term "Nordishist" instead of "Nordicist" as to encompass of all the Northwestern races and not just the Nordids.
"Anonymous said...
Your native language is not English, troll."
My native language is English, like it or not.
Anyways, whatever you and your ilk think of me is of no importance. If I cared about what swarthoids and their fellow non-Whites thought of me, I would not be posting here.
""European men with darker, sultry features from countries like Spain, Italy, Portugal, and France" are most attractive - http://www.rooshv.com/totem-pole-of-race-attractiveness
Alright, so Med men are more attractive...it's just too bad they are dumber, more corrupt, lazy, and build shittier countries than Northern Euros. Where would you rather live...Sicily or Sweden?
Anon:"It is not as though families can or will stop it. Northern Euro fathers are just relieved it's not a black when their daughters bring home Southern Euro males."
Or is it "some Black"? Hey Guido, your hair is suspiciously curly...
"Silver said...
they're just trying to lead a decent life and fit into things as best they can."
Bogus, if their swarthoid countries are so good and they are so proud of "their achievements" from 3,000 years ago, why is it that they have to move to OUR countries to lead a "decent life and fit into things as best they can"?
Swarthoids are scrounger, like the kikes in Poland, like the Gypsies in Romania, like the Turks in Germany, like the Iraqis in Sweden, like the Maghrebis in France, like the Indians in England, like the niggers in America, like the asians in Canada and so on.
All this talk about the British being Nords, yeah it is true generally but don't forget that a large percentage of British Islanders have very old Med-ish/Celtic ancestry, hence the prevalence of slightly darker skin tones, hairiness, shorter stature, and more snubby noses in certain sectors of the population (especially the lower classes there).
Remember that the Nords invaded the British Isles in wave after wave and usually killed off the native men (all of whom were the ancient Med-ish/Celtic types). However, they usually didn't kill all of the women and female children, preferring instead of keep them as wives or slaves, and inevitably many children resulted from that mix and thus the Med-ish/Celtic mix remains in the UK today. Also in terms of the prevalence of red hair which is not an especially Nordic trait.
I believe they call them North-Atlantid types, people who are mostly Nordic though with a smattering of old Med-ish mixture, or 'exotic Nords': http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/rg-north.htm
Alright, so Med men are more attractive...
dude who wrote that's turkish right? the hell kindof name is rooshv?
Meds slowly crowd out Nords after a nation settles down and becomes more mass-urban-industrial; a few remarks on this from THE PASSING OF THE GREAT RACE by M. Grant:
"An extremely potent influence, however, is the transformation of the nation from an agricultural
to a manufacturing community. Heavy, healthful work in the fields of northern Europe enables the Nordic type to thrive, but the cramped factory and crowded city quickly weed him out, while the
little brunet Mediterranean can work a spindle, set type, sell ribbons or push a clerk's pen far better than the big, clumsy and somewhat heavy Nordic blond, who needs exercise, meat and air and cannot live under Ghetto conditions.
The increase of urban communities at the expense of the countryside is also an important element in the fading of the Nordic type, because the energetic countryman of this blood is more apt to improve his fortunes by moving to the city than the less ambitious Mediterranean.
The country villages and the farms are the nurseries of nations, while cities are consumers and seldom producers of men. The effort now being made in America to settle undesirable immigrants on farms may, from the viewpoint of race replacement, be more dangerous than allowing them to remain in crowded Ghettos or tenements.
...
The refusal of the native American to work with his hands when he can hire or import serfs to do manual labor for him is the prelude to his extinction and the immigrant laborers are now breeding out their masters and killing by filth and by crowding as effectively as by the sword.
Thus the American sold his birthright in a continent to solve a labor problem.
...
As soon as a group of men migrate to new surroundings, climatic, social or industrial, a new form of selection arises and those not fitted to the new conditions die off at a greater rate than in their original home. This form of differential selection plays a large part in modern industrial centres and in large cities, where unsanitary conditions bear more heavily on the children of Nordics than on those of Alpines or Mediterraneans.
...
As to what the future mixture will be it is evident that in large sections of the country the native American will entirely disappear. He will not intermarry with inferior races and he cannot compete in the sweat shop and in the street trench with the newcomers. Large cities from the days of Rome, Alexandria, and Byzantium have always been gathering points of diverse races, but New York is becoming a cloaca gentium which will produce many amazing racial hybrids and some ethnic horrors that will be beyond the powers of future anthropologists to unravel.
...
The brunet Mediterranean element in the native American seems to be increasing at the expense of the blond Nordic element generally throughout the Southern States and probably also in the large
cities. This type of man, however, is scarce on our frontiers. In the Northwest and in Alaska in the days of the gold rush it was in the mining camps a matter of comment if a man turned up with dark eyes, so universal were blue and gray eyes among the American pioneers."
- http://www.archive.org/stream/passingofgreatra00granuoft/passingofgreatra00granuoft_djvu.txt
Northern Euro fathers are just relieved it's not a black when their daughters bring home Southern Euro males."
It's still miscegenation just a difference of degree. It's the same mental disorder.
Grant again on Meds replacing Nords which leads to racial-cultural-national decline:
"If England has deteriorated and there are those who think they see indications of such decline, it is due to the lowering proportion of the Nordic blood and the transfer of political power from the vigorous Nordic aristocracy and middle classes to the radical and labor elements, both largely recruited from the Mediterranean type." - http://www.archive.org/stream/passingofgreatra00granuoft/passingofgreatra00granuoft_djvu.txt
---
Spengler on British decline due to loss of its best (Nordic) blood:
"But neither is the English nation strong, young, or healthy enough, spiritually and racially, to combat this terrible crisis with confidence. Too much of its precious blood was spent in the nineteenth century for its possessions, was lost by the exodus to the white dominions and by the devastating effects of climate in the coloured colonies. Above all, it lacks the racial foundation of a tough peasantry. The ruling upper class of Germanic or Celtic race - there is no difference between them - which dates from the conquest, has been used up. The mass of the original population, erroneously called Celts, has forced its way up to a dominant position by its radically different "French" life-feeling."
And in Spain:
"Great history is exacting. It devours the racially best elements. It devoured ancient Rome in a few centuries. The Nordic migrations, which had come to standstill in Southern Europe a thousand years before, set in again on the grand scale on the discovery of America, taking oceans in their stride. Vigorous Spanish families, of predominantly Nordic origin, migrated in numbers to the new continent, where they could fight, explore, and rule. By about 1800 the best aristocracy of the Spanish stamp was there and vigorous life had died out in the mother country."
- http://www.archive.org/stream/TheHourOfDecision/HOD_djvu.txt
"Hey You said...
I believe they call them North-Atlantid types, people who are mostly Nordic though with a smattering of old Med-ish mixture, or 'exotic Nords': http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/rg-north.htm"
The fallacy is to associate pigmentation with "meds", big mistake.
Atlantids are the result of Paleolithics mixing with Nordids, so to make it short:
Atlantid = Paoleo-Atlantid/Nordid.
Here are some exemplar of Paleo-Atlantids:
Henry Rollins:
http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/7545/r120r120.jpg
Sam Witwer:
http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/4104/r121r121.jpg
Mike O'Hearn:
http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/7977/r122r122.jpg
The most Paleo-Atlantid would be of course Henry Rollins as he is the most robust and has the most cromagnoid-like features, second would be Sam Witwer and third would be Mike O'Hearn as he is obviously the most Nordid influenced.
European meds and non-european meds have moles and naevus on their bodies, that is a typically weird/kinky med characteristic among many others. Atlantids and Paleo-Atlantids do not have such characteristics.
"Hey You said...
don't forget that a large percentage of British Islanders have very old Med-ish/Celtic ancestry, hence the prevalence of slightly darker skin tones, hairiness, shorter stature, and more snubby noses in certain sectors of the population (especially the lower classes there)."
You also make the mistake to think that the Celts were "swarthoid meds". They were not, I quote:
"The Tuatha-de-Dananns were a noble race. Bold in battle and skilful in art, they were men to conquer and to retain their conquests. These people were builders and workers in stone and metal, and from them we possess the largest native collections of tools and the formation of metal weapons, technically known as celts, and nearly the largest national collection of swords and battle axes." - M. F. Cusack, A History of the City and County of Cork (1875)
Again another Paleolithic race known today in anthropological terms as "Brünn", here a caricature of a Brünn female (on the right):
http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/7296/r123r123.jpg
The snub noses, brown hair, red hair, muscular built and so on comes from the Paleolithics.
The Atlantid race is similar to the Aran and Trønder races in that they are all Paleolithic/Nordid.
Aran = Brünn/Nordid
Atlantid = Paleo-Atlantid/Nordid
Trønder = Dalofaelid/Nordid
Yes, you are right Rassenhygieniker - I've been confusing Paleolithics with "Celts" and "ancient Meds."
Duly noted.
I guess I should've got that right since I'm predominately North-Atlantid myself with both Paleolithic and Nordic ancestry (and also a bit of med too with some distant Spanish ancestry, complicated further by Neolithic German).
The Atlantid race is similar to the Aran and Trønder races in that they are all Paleolithic/Nordid.
Atlantid = Paleo-Atlantid/Nordid
@(Who else)
Hence not pure Aryo-Germanic (since they were altered through admixture with them), and hence inferior to the A-Germanics.
The fallacy is to associate pigmentation with "meds", big mistake.
Atlantids are the result of Paleolithics mixing with Nordids, so to make it short:
European meds and non-european meds have moles and naevus on their bodies, that is a typically weird/kinky med characteristic among many others. Atlantids and Paleo-Atlantids do not have such characteristics. @(Who else)
Will-to-possession is the Nordic meaning of life. said...
Grant again on Meds replacing Nords which leads to racial-cultural-national decline:
"If England has deteriorated and there are those who think they see indications of such decline, it is due to the lowering proportion of the Nordic blood and the transfer of political power from the vigorous Nordic aristocracy and middle classes to the radical and labor elements, both largely recruited from the Mediterranean type." -
http://www.archive.org/stream/passingofgreatra00granuoft/passingofgreatra00granuoft_djvu.txt
Good Lord, these self-hating, wanna-be "Nordicists" don't even read, or apparently even believe, the works of real Nordicists like Madison Grant!
The only things that are "separating" are Northern Euro patrilines as Northern Euro males increasingly remain virgins, become gay, or seek Asian wives.
Southern Euro patrilines will dominate not just in historically Southern Euro populations but in virtually all White populations as well. White populations will increasingly consist of Southern Euro patrilines and Southern Euro and Northern Euro matrilines and eventually completely.
Northern Euro patrilines will go extinct among White populations and exist in Asia.
This sounds like separation to me. So don't worry. You want separation and it looks like you're getting it.
Sayonara.
Southern Euro patrilines will dominate not just in historically Southern Euro populations but in virtually all White populations as well. White populations will increasingly consist of Southern Euro patrilines and Southern Euro and Northern Euro matrilines and eventually completely.
Pu-leeze, who are you kidding, since Southern European men are not doing all that much better in this regard than their Northern European cousins.
Look, as an American of South Euro descent, I am against extreme Nordicist mega-chauvinism, but comments like this are not only untrue, but incendiary and provacative, and does nothing to add to the discourse or understanding between Northern and Southern Euros.
Keep critical comments directed against specific bad behavior ('you-know-who'), not gratuitous ad-hominums against the character of various North Euro peoples.
The silence of the swarthoids when pressed on the issue of separation is deafening. Not one of these tough talkers has the stomach to address the topic. Instead, they express their genocidal desires and their wish for the extinction of Northern Europeans.
The "arguments" they make against Nordicism are no different from those a negro would make against white nationalism.
Not one of these tough talkers has the stomach to address the topic.
Sure about that? Dunno how much clearer I can be.
I think we´re all a little tired of seeing all these mediterroni mudmen FUCKING our women! These muditerraneans are inferior to the foul smelling semi-liquid feces and menstrual blood that comes out of my ass! Listen up dagoes, greeks and other muds: I AM A GOD AND YOU ARE INFERIOR TO MY SHIT! YOU ARE INFERIOR TO THE PEANUTS IN MY SHIT! CAPEECHEE?
SPAGHETTI NIGGERS: YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO ANSWER MY POSTS!
"Anonymous said...
Hence not pure Aryo-Germanic (since they were altered through admixture with them), and hence inferior to the A-Germanics."
What part of Northwestern European Preservation do you not understand? If you were not aware, your typical racial makeup among Germanics is Paleolithic/Nordid, clearly Nordicism is too much of a complex ideology for the limited and alien mind of the intellectually mediocre swarthoid masses.
The person who coinded the term Aryo-Germanic, was the Ariosophist Guido von List and he was a typical Paleolithic/Nordid central European Germanic :
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/9948/r109r109.jpg
____________________________________
"Hey You said...
I guess I should've got that right since I'm predominately North-Atlantid myself with both Paleolithic and Nordic ancestry (and also a bit of med too with some distant Spanish ancestry, complicated further by Neolithic German)."
Ancestry?
Sure about that? Dunno how much clearer I can be.
True. You're not one of the bombastic ranters, though.
#74 is a retarded, self-deluded anthroscape pervert.
Rassenhygieniker:"Ancestry?"
American mutt: Scottish, Scotch-Irish, English (mostly Yorkshire Viking stock), German (and Austrian?), and a single New World Spanish ancestor (Nordic Spanish). Might also have some East Baltic German in me somewhere it seems.
I am a strange mixture of Paleolithic and Neolithic. I've been meaning to submit a few photos to the Skadi forum to see how they classify me since I'm fairly new to physical sub-racial classification.
#77 you are officially a NIGGER!
The silence of the swarthoids when pressed on the issue of separation is deafening. Not one of these tough talkers has the stomach to address the topic. Instead, they express their genocidal desires and their wish for the extinction of Northern Europeans.
You pan-Nordicist types (you know, the ones always attacking sensible White Advocates of being 'pan-Aryanists') are really something else. Nobody is advocating for a renewal of Italian or Portuguese immigration to America or Northern Europe. Further, just because a European or Euro-American 'Med' wishes to identify as a White Nationalist doesn't mean he wishes to see half of Sicily or Greece relocated to Sweden.
OK - here is a direct answer to your question on seperation: Southern European Americans are going nowhere, now or anytime in the future. The ancestors of nearly all South Euros in America have been here for over 100 years and have assimilated to the Anglo-North European Majority culture, and it is just as much their country as it is any other White Americans.
Good grief, even the progenitor of the whole Nordish theory Richard McCulloch has come to agree with this (and even before this, he still wanted to accept lighter-complected Southern Europeans ... anything under a '10' on his 'assimilability scale').
Your internet obsession with Southern Europeans is really, really creepy. Maybe its best you get out a little more and see what people are like in the real world, instead of what you read about them in centuries-old books.
"Nobody is advocating for a renewal of Italian or Portuguese immigration to America or Northern Europe."
Italians and Portuguese really want to emigrate to the aMERDica nowadays.
"Your internet obsession with Southern Europeans is really, really creepy. Maybe its best you get out a little more and see what people are like in the real world, instead of what you read about them in centuries-old books."
Or maybe their whole agenda is just to stir up shit because they are losers who areunable of getting any non-prostitute to have sex with them in the real world.
OK - here is a direct answer to your question on seperation: Latino Americans are going nowhere, esse, now or anytime in the future, homes. Our ancestors were here first and the white man killed our people and took our land. We do work your people won't do, and you stole the southwest from us, we're just taking it back! Viva la raza!
Every non-Nordish group has their own version of the same tripe.
McCulloch obviously gave in to pressure from that sociopathic queer Johnson to conform. That's a poor choice he made, but McCulloch has always been a pacifist and concedes to others as his plan is to give away parts of our country to recent non-white immigrants which I completely disagree with. America, Canada, Australia and South Africa would have never existed with that sort of capitulation.
McCulloch does mention that all future immigration should be limited to mostly Nords, similar to the Immigration Act of 1924. Even this mild act of preservation is rejected by Meds. Because in the end the swarthoids don't want to even acknowledge Northern Europeans as a people. Like the third world hordes they want their equality and access to Nordish women.
Rassenhygieniker has quite the impressive collection of pictures of male racial types, especially the hunky 'exemplar' Atlantids he is so fond of posting.
Hmmmm, maybe he grew up watching and liking movies about gladiators.
Even this mild act of preservation is rejected by Meds.
Name some, and cite where they actually said this.
Because in the end the swarthoids don't want to even acknowledge Northern Europeans as a people.
Well, in your never-ending campaign of dehumanization against 'swarthoids' and not acknowledge them as even people, do you blame them if some of them return the favor?
Like the third world hordes they want their equality and access to Nordish women.
The dehumanization just never stops with some of ya, eh? How mendaciously stupid, btw, for you to compare Euro-Meds to third worlders, especially Mexicans. Last time I checked, the Paisans in the Northeast never had an irredentianist claim on the state of New Jersey -- thinking that it belongs to Italy cause so many of them live there the way Mexicans think California and the whole Southwest belongs to them.
*Oh, and regarding the other stupid libel: Southern European White Advocates do not get into this kind of movement cause they are looking for a woman, Nordish or otherwise. Racial movements have miniscule numbers of women to begin with, and the it's the absolute last place you'll find a pretty one.
Many of us good, decent and fully assimilated Southern Europeans you routinely take your hateful frustrations out on face the same kinds of woman problems that you do (types like "Mike 'The Situation" (who isn't even all-Italian) on 'Joisey Shore' is not the type of person that gets involved in White identity politics) so it would be wise if you would stop blaming 'Meds' for your lack of success with the ladies, cause we're not your problem.
OK - here is a direct answer to your question on seperation: Southern European Americans are going nowhere, now or anytime in the future. The ancestors of nearly all South Euros in America have been here for over 100 years and have assimilated to the Anglo-North European Majority culture, and it is just as much their country as it is any other White Americans.
Separation doesn't necessarily have to mean Southern Europeans leaving North American territory. Separation would involve establishing sovereign, autonomous Nordish areas on North American territory, either in areas that are already Nordish in population or in unpopulated/low-density areas that would be settled by Nords, and then excluding non-Nords from those areas.
"Anonymous said...
Rassenhygieniker has quite the impressive collection of pictures of male racial types, especially the hunky 'exemplar' Atlantids he is so fond of posting."
Well the problem usually with posting female exemplars comes from the hair bleaching, the coloured contact lenses, the plastic surgery and so on. This is exemplified when I used Πετρούλα Κωστίδου as an exemplar here:
http://racehist.blogspot.com/2010/10/genetic-deterioriation-of-modern.html
As she had alot of work done on her and this is a common practice amongst Mediterranean/Middle Eastern females especially when considering that 2/3 of lebanese women gets plastic suregy and that the greeks are pretty much on the same level.
But this is not surprising considering that your typical greek is a shitskin, similar to the typical non-Euro med from the Middle East.
"The most Mediterranean/Middle Eastern people in Europe are the Greeks at 60.5%."
http://ethnicgenome.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/european-genetic-admixtures-y-dna/
____________________________________
"Anonymous said...
The dehumanization just never stops with some of ya, eh? How mendaciously stupid, btw, for you to compare Euro-Meds to third worlders, especially Mexicans."
I agree, comparing Third Wolders to meds is insulting toward Third Wolders!
This greasy wop bullshit began when they let dago DiMaggio play in the major leagues! Since then they´ve been changing their names to Anthony from Tony to infiltrate the White Race! I think its time for us Germanic-Nordics to stand up and firebomb some pizzarias!
Kulaks Never Learn, why are you such a passive-aggressive bitch?
Kulaks Never Learn must have multiple personality disorder, given all the different phony names and identities he's used.
Or else he's a sociopath.
"Langobard"
lol
same troll, gazillionth new name
Kulaks Never Learn, why are you such a passive-aggressive bitch?
Hey miggles,
Projection much?
Why did you stop posting under your handle "MGLS"? Are you ashamed of those initials after Cyd kicked your ass over there at the Occidental Dissent forum, where you, like a little pussy, scrubbed all your posts?
Miggles, your such a waste of life its not even funny, a congenitally-sick obsessive-compulsive internet nerd who spends 24/7 online, and whose greatest 'achievement' is playing internet detective.
By the way boy, how do you claim to know just who I or anyone else here is, or what handles I or anyone else posts under?? Are you a computer hacker?
Well, since your a lonely nerd, I let you have your little fun feeling sooooo important attacking anyone here who disagrees with you as "Cyd" "Medginald" or "Kulaks".
Fuck you much.
What part of Northwestern European Preservation do you not understand? If you were not aware, your typical racial makeup among Germanics is Paleolithic/Nordid, clearly Nordicism is too much of a complex ideology for the limited and alien mind of the intellectually mediocre swarthoid masses. @Who else
More self-serving rationalizations from our resident faux-Nord.
Boy oh boy Rass, the mental gymnastics native boys like you will do to make yourself an 'honorary Germanic/Nordic'.
Don't 'Nordic' stalwarts like yourself even bother to read real scolarship from genuine Nordicist writers, rather than cherry-pick to Nordicise your own background, and put your ancestry in the most favorable light?
In a nutshell, the ancient Germanics were obviously not paleolithic -- they were not even indigenous to 'Northern Europe' but came from Western Asia -- so whatever you are talking about regarding 'Germanics' today are the result of altered admixture with the native paleolithic European stock.
Again, read some of the stuff over at Skadi, instead of conjecturing and making stuff up to fulfill your childhood fantasies of being a 'Norse warrior' (lol).
==
"A notion on Lundman's North-Atlantid race [Archive] - Skadi Forum
The Irish are still of the same racial make-up as of the English conquest hundreds of years ago or in other words mostly North-Atlantid and somewhat Nordic. The former race dominates the poorer parts, which is the mountains of the west and the south, as well as some bog parts of central Ireland. The North-Atlantid may be seen as the pre-Keltic original population, which spoke a non-Indo-European language, a fact which is regarded as confirmed by the extremely distinctive linguistic development of the Irish langugage.
Lundman, Bertil (1988). Jordens Folkstammar. P 59.
http://forums.skadi.net/archive/index.php/t-72185.html
These conjured terms are used by people who don't quite fall into the 'Nordid/Nordoid/Nordic' category but wanted to be affiliated with what they perceive as the 'Nordic master race' all the same.
Compare with "Whitish" or "Four o'clockish"
Approximate, but not quite.
It's a kind of honourary status for "Nordid'/'Nordoid'/'Nordic" wannabees.
Separation doesn't necessarily have to mean Southern Europeans leaving North American territory. Separation would involve establishing sovereign, autonomous Nordish areas on North American territory, either in areas that are already Nordish in population or in unpopulated/low-density areas that would be settled by Nords, and then excluding non-Nords from those areas.
Gee, you know, what you say here is fair and reasonably articulated on your part. Too bad you and a few others like yourself cannot talk and explain yourself like this more often without going into hysterics and attacking anyone who disagrees with you as a 'swarthoid' or invoking a grand 'Med conspiracy' against 'Nords'.
What are you so angry about, Kulaks Never Learn? And why are you a hysterical, passive-aggressive little bitch who posts under dozens of bogus names and identities? You're the type of person who insincerely flatters someone and then turns around and stabs them in the back.
What's your next name going to be, "langobard"?
Rassenhygieniker has quite the impressive collection of pictures of male racial types
Racial specimens are typically male because men are more specialized than females. That was a cheap shot that proves your ignorance.
Separation doesn't necessarily have to mean Southern Europeans leaving North American territory.
They can move to Canada or Latin America with their Latino buddies.
Name some, and cite where they actually said this.
I've never met one that agreed that the USA is a Nordish country (not just as a majority) and at least further immigration should be limited to Nords. Are you agreeing to this?
Well, in your never-ending campaign of dehumanization against 'swarthoids' and not acknowledge them as even people, do you blame them if some of them return the favor?
How is it dehumanization to point out their darker pigmentation? Are you ashamed of it? That's your problem.
LOL, of course I acknowledge them as a people, how else could I discriminate against them.
Your comment is filled with typical nonsense and silly assertions that we're only racially motivated because we can't get a GF. Yeah, the only reason White guys get into racial preservation is because they don't have a GF or are some kind of loser. You sound just like anti-racists, seriously it's comical and you don't even see it.
Your internet obsession with Southern Europeans is really, really creepy. Maybe its best you get out a little more and see what people are like in the real world, instead of what you read about them in centuries-old books.
Yes and no.
Firstly, "creepy" = more or less and true and makes me uncomfortable so please stop.
Secondly, it's undeniably true that no people are ever the horror stories that racialist rhetoric makes them out to be. All we can really say with any accuracy is that there are people more similar to us and less similar than us and on balance interaction with those more similar to us is that much more pleasing, and that dealing with the unlike is, at best, underwhelming, and at worst, exceedingly stressful. But exceptions abound. That's why it's so difficult for the average person to connect with what these absolutist unhinged hardasses like "rassen" wail about (even though the essence of what he's on about is correct).
McCulloch obviously gave in to pressure from that sociopathic queer Johnson to conform. That's a poor choice he made, but McCulloch has always been a pacifist and concedes to others as his plan is to give away parts of our country to recent non-white immigrants which I completely disagree with. America, Canada, Australia and South Africa would have never existed with that sort of capitulation.
Fair enough. But immigration did happen; (basic) cultural assimilation did occur; and ties have been forged. All that happened because there was never anything like your level of racial hyperconsciousness present when those countries were formed. (Consciousness yes; hyperconsciousness, no.)
Now that it's happened the real question is what to do? You want war, is essentially what you're saying, but the only people who'll agree are those who share your intense racial revulsion. Most people, despite having some degree of race feeling, don't even come close to that level of intensity. You people have been hanging your hat on the possibility* and plausibility* of feeling so racially intense for decades -- at what point do you concede that the vast bulk of people aren't going to match you?
* By this I mean it's possible to feel as racially intense as you do and it's plausible that a person who doesn't yet feel as intense could come to feel as intense. What you don't seem to realize is that it's possible not to feel that intense, ie to agree with all your vaunted facts and truths and still not feel intensely negative towards racial others.
That's why I think the separatist model is best. It gives people something to be for (rather than merely against) and it doesn't even require them to feel negatively about others. It doesn't even require "giving away" any territory. You can correct me on this, but imo most groups are most interested in their relationship to (real) whites much more than their relationship to other groups. Eg Japanese care more about their relationship with (meaning, the ways they relate to) whites than their relationship with Arabs. Based on this, a separatist program aimed at achieving a core white America along with biracial (white + the other group) statelets/territories seems quite viable, particularly because it unites rather divides families who've married into each other. (Of course, various degrees of segregation with those statelets would also be possible if desired.) McCulloch types won't like this because at heart they're ardent nationalists, thus they want complete separation and evolution into an entire new species. Should be clear that mine is a plan much more in keeping with the basic orientation of a leftward-shifted populace largely uninterested in intensely negative attitudes towards others.
"Silver said...
Firstly, "creepy""
Swarthoid's obsession for Nordicism (Northernish preservation) is even more so.
How is it dehumanization to point out their darker pigmentation? Are you ashamed of it? That's your problem.
For one thing, not all Southern Europeans have a 'darker pigmentation', just like not all Northern Europeans have a light one (and the majority of them are not even blonde).
Like it has been pointed out before, the biggest 'Nordicists' seem to tend to usually be the darker and coarser members of the Northern Europeans.
Notice that is probably why Rassie didn't bother to acknowledge this little gem of factual truth -
==
"A notion on Lundman's North-Atlantid race [Archive] - Skadi Forum
The Irish are still of the same racial make-up as of the English conquest hundreds of years ago or in other words mostly North-Atlantid and somewhat Nordic. The former race dominates the poorer parts, which is the mountains of the west and the south, as well as some bog parts of central Ireland. The North-Atlantid may be seen as the pre-Keltic original population, which spoke a non-Indo-European language, a fact which is regarded as confirmed by the extremely distinctive linguistic development of the Irish langugage.
Lundman, Bertil (1988). Jordens Folkstammar. P 59.
http://forums.skadi.net/archive/index.php/t-72185.html
Just as the anti-white responds to the white preservationist by harping on "inferiorities" of whites, Kulaks Never Learn responds to the Nordish preservationist by harping on "inferiorities" of Northern Europeans. What they don't understand is that it's about our preservation as a people, not who is "inferior." Genocidal Kulaks Never Learn believes Northern Europeans are worthless scum who don't deserve to survive as a unique entity because they're not "perfect." Does he have the same standard for Southern Europeans?
Just as the anti-white responds to the white preservationist by harping on "inferiorities" of whites, Kulaks Never Learn responds to the Nordish preservationist by harping on "inferiorities" of Northern Europeans. What they don't understand is that it's about our preservation as a people, not who is "inferior." Genocidal Kulaks Never Learn believes Northern Europeans are worthless scum who don't deserve to survive as a unique entity because they're not "perfect." Does he have the same standard for Southern Europeans?
No MGLS, it has nothing to do with wanting to see the 'destruction' of Northern Europeans. All I am pointing out are some of the extreme hypocrisies of some Nordic Chauvanists (all 'Northern Euros are Nordic'), not decent Nordish Preservationists, which I agree is the standard of what White America has been all about, racially and culturally.
You get me wrong, I have great respect for Northern European peoples (plural) and societies, and think they are unquestionably superior in so many ways. However, I don't see them as a singular, 'One People' as you and some others may, but this does not mean I deny them the right to their collective preservation or, most importantly, the preservation of their individual ethnic and national identities. I recognize they are made up of distinct sub-races rather than just the Nordic, which although may be predominant in Scandinavia, south-eastern England, northern Germany and the Low countries, is not so dominant elsewhere. This was the only point I was trying to make, not imply "inferiority" or "worthless scum" that doesn't 'deserve survival'.
Please understand the nuances of what I am saying.
"Anonymous said...
All I am pointing out are some of the extreme hypocrisies of some Nordic Chauvanists (all 'Northern Euros are Nordic'), not decent Nordish Preservationists, which I agree is the standard of what White America has been all about, racially and culturally."
All autochthonous Northern Europeans are Nordics.
But not all Nordics are Nordid.
The only ones claiming this are swarthoids, jews and other non-Whites who are afraid of Nordish Preservationism.
"Anonymous said...
How is it dehumanization to point out their darker pigmentation? Are you ashamed of it? That's your problem."
It is "dehumanization " in similar ways when negroids are reminded that they are niggers by White people, even though they call each others niggers all the time. Call it inferiority complex if you must.
Swarthoids want to destroy Northwest European to dispell their inferiority by lowering the standards of Whiteness to their levels and hence make themselves the "New Whites".
"Anonymous said...
For one thing, not all Southern Europeans have a 'darker pigmentation'"
No need to be ashamed as Arabic/Turkic/Jewish and other afro-asiatic traits are prevalent amongst them, no need to whitewash it by pointing out 1 or 2 Southern Europeans who do not conform to the rule.
"
You get me wrong, I have great respect for Northern European peoples (plural) and societies, and think they are unquestionably superior in so many ways. However, I don't see them as a singular, 'One People' as you and some others may, but this does not mean I deny them the right to their collective preservation or, most importantly, the preservation of their individual ethnic and national identities. I recognize they are made up of distinct sub-races rather than just the Nordic, which although may be predominant in Scandinavia, south-eastern England, northern Germany and the Low countries, is not so dominant elsewhere. This was the only point I was trying to make, not imply "inferiority" or "worthless scum" that doesn't 'deserve survival'. "
They are made up of distinct NATIONALITIES of which North Americans, nordish or otherwise, are definitely not a part. Many of these posters are deluded people who have never left the USA and actually believe they would be welcomed with open arms by the true northern Europeans in Europe just because they have the same skin colour. Scandinavians who are proud of their unique culture probably don´t care too much for Americans, Canadians and other foreign nations.
OK - here is a direct answer to your question on seperation: Southern European Americans are going nowhere, now or anytime in the future.
Here is your answer to white nationalism: Black Americans are going nowhere, now or anytime in the future. Hispanic Americans are going nowhere, now or anytime in the future. Asian Americans are going nowhere, now or anytime in the future.
it has nothing to do with wanting to see the 'destruction' of Northern Europeans
Yes, it does. You oppose separation and thereby support the destruction of Northern Europeans.
All you care about is yourself. You drip venom on the desire for Northern European preservation simply because it excludes you. You support white nationalism because you believe it includes you.
However, I don't see them as a singular, 'One People' as you and some others may
This "argument" you and the rest of the swarthoids make boils down to this: "There are differences among Northern Europeans. Therefore Northern Europeans have no right to preserve themselves and separate from Southern Europeans."
Suppose a black said: "There are differences among whites. They're not 'One People.' Therefore whites have no right to preserve themselves and separate from blacks."
There are more differences among whites than among Northern Europeans, but you don't get hysterically worked up about that and start ranting "Whites aren't 'One People.' Many whites are inferior. White nationalists are losers who take their hateful frustrations out on people of color. Stop blaming people of color for your problems with women."
You're just like an anti-racist, and it's comical that you can't see it.
Your pathetic objections to Northern European preservation apply even more so to white nationalism, which you support. However, you don't care about consistency. Nordish preservation excludes you, so you think it's bad. White nationalism includes you, so you think it's good.
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/wise.htm
"Why don't you just respond to the article I have written and send me the response, bitch?
The points I made are mostly analytical, not a matter of how many Jewish individuals you can dig up who are prominent in media. William Pierce (whose body is being consumed by worms right about now, as is well deserved) did the ultimate research on this, and it meant nothing for the reasons pointed out in my article, among others. All of that info is irrelevant unless you a priori assume Jews are evil, which of course you do. Once you explain the statistical analysis I offered as wrong, and why it's wrong (i.e., the proper analysis is Jews in media/finance versus Jews in NY, since that is the hub of both industries where almost all the powerful players reside), then maybe I will listen to your ranting.
Until then you are just a punk ass nazi bitch, with nothing of value to say. Start the race war you piece of shit, or shut the fuck up.
Love and kisses
Tim Wise
Oh, BTW, you should know something: federal law prohibits you from publishing any private email correspondence without the express permission of the author. I can send you the statute if you 'd like it. I most definitely do not give you permission to post or distribute anything I write to you (sorta like the part where I called you a punk ass nazi bitch, you punk ass nazi bitch), in any form. So, if you decide to print this email in whole or in part, I will file charges on your punk ass nazi bitch ass, and I'm sure I can find a nice Jewish federal prosecutor to charge you.
Hugs, Tim"
____________________________________
Now, what Tim Wise wrote pretty much sound exactly like the kind of diatribe our resident swarthoids would come up with, eh? What Tim Wise wrote, could very well have been written by Mudginald, Cyd, Sir Infamous and the pletoria of anti-White nonwhites.
Judaism and Meridionalism, of different tribes, but same ideology.
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/wise.htm
"Why don't you just respond to the article I have written and send me the response, bitch?
The points I made are mostly analytical, not a matter of how many Jewish individuals you can dig up who are prominent in media. William Pierce (whose body is being consumed by worms right about now, as is well deserved) did the ultimate research on this, and it meant nothing for the reasons pointed out in my article, among others. All of that info is irrelevant unless you a priori assume Jews are evil, which of course you do. Once you explain the statistical analysis I offered as wrong, and why it's wrong (i.e., the proper analysis is Jews in media/finance versus Jews in NY, since that is the hub of both industries where almost all the powerful players reside), then maybe I will listen to your ranting.
Until then you are just a punk ass nazi bitch, with nothing of value to say. Start the race war you piece of shit, or shut the fuck up.
Love and kisses
Tim Wise
Oh, BTW, you should know something: federal law prohibits you from publishing any private email correspondence without the express permission of the author. I can send you the statute if you 'd like it. I most definitely do not give you permission to post or distribute anything I write to you (sorta like the part where I called you a punk ass nazi bitch, you punk ass nazi bitch), in any form. So, if you decide to print this email in whole or in part, I will file charges on your punk ass nazi bitch ass, and I'm sure I can find a nice Jewish federal prosecutor to charge you.
Hugs, Tim"
____________________________________
Now, what Tim Wise wrote pretty much sound exactly like the kind of diatribe our resident swarthoids would come up with, eh? What Tim Wise wrote, could very well have been written by Mudginald, Cyd, Sir Infamous and the other pletoria of anti-White nonwhites.
Judaism and Meridionalism, of different tribes, but same ideology.
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/wise.htm
"Why don't you just respond to the article I have written and send me the response, bitch?
The points I made are mostly analytical, not a matter of how many Jewish individuals you can dig up who are prominent in media. William Pierce (whose body is being consumed by worms right about now, as is well deserved) did the ultimate research on this, and it meant nothing for the reasons pointed out in my article, among others. All of that info is irrelevant unless you a priori assume Jews are evil, which of course you do. Once you explain the statistical analysis I offered as wrong, and why it's wrong (i.e., the proper analysis is Jews in media/finance versus Jews in NY, since that is the hub of both industries where almost all the powerful players reside), then maybe I will listen to your ranting.
Until then you are just a punk ass nazi bitch, with nothing of value to say. Start the race war you piece of shit, or shut the fuck up.
Love and kisses
Tim Wise
Oh, BTW, you should know something: federal law prohibits you from publishing any private email correspondence without the express permission of the author. I can send you the statute if you 'd like it. I most definitely do not give you permission to post or distribute anything I write to you (sorta like the part where I called you a punk ass nazi bitch, you punk ass nazi bitch), in any form. So, if you decide to print this email in whole or in part, I will file charges on your punk ass nazi bitch ass, and I'm sure I can find a nice Jewish federal prosecutor to charge you.
Hugs, Tim"
Now, what Tim Wise wrote pretty much sound exactly like the kind of diatribe our resident swarthoids would come up with, eh? What Tim Wise wrote, could very well have been written by Mudginald, Cyd, Sir Infamous and the other pletoria of anti-White nonwhites.
Judaism and Meridionalism, of different tribes, but same ideology.
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/wise.htm
"Why don't you just respond to the article I have written and send me the response, bitch?
The points I made are mostly analytical, not a matter of how many Jewish individuals you can dig up who are prominent in media. William Pierce (whose body is being consumed by worms right about now, as is well deserved) did the ultimate research on this, and it meant nothing for the reasons pointed out in my article, among others. All of that info is irrelevant unless you a priori assume Jews are evil, which of course you do. Once you explain the statistical analysis I offered as wrong, and why it's wrong (i.e., the proper analysis is Jews in media/finance versus Jews in NY, since that is the hub of both industries where almost all the powerful players reside), then maybe I will listen to your ranting.
Until then you are just a punk ass nazi bitch, with nothing of value to say. Start the race war you piece of shit, or shut the fuck up.
Love and kisses
Tim Wise
Oh, BTW, you should know something: federal law prohibits you from publishing any private email correspondence without the express permission of the author. I can send you the statute if you 'd like it. I most definitely do not give you permission to post or distribute anything I write to you (sorta like the part where I called you a punk ass nazi bitch, you punk ass nazi bitch), in any form. So, if you decide to print this email in whole or in part, I will file charges on your punk ass nazi bitch ass, and I'm sure I can find a nice Jewish federal prosecutor to charge you.
Hugs, Tim"
Now, what Tim Wise wrote pretty much sound exactly like the kind of diatribe our resident swarthoids would come up with, eh? What Tim Wise wrote, could very well have been written by Mudginald, Cyd, Sir Infamous and the other pletoria of anti-White nonwhites.
Judaism and Meridionalism, of different tribes, but same ideology.
Rassenhygieniker said...
All autochthonous Northern Europeans are Nordics.
Are you sure about this Rass? I don't think this is the historical consensus on the definition of Nordic, which, to most historians, anthropologists and lay people alike means the tall, long-headed/dolicocephalic, blond or fair-haired, blue or light-eyed people who may indeed predominate in much of Northern Europe, but are not exclusive to it.
Going by the definition of autochthonous to define who/what is Nordic, then this would obviously have to include the indigenous Lapps or Sami of Scandinavia as 'Nordic' as well, since they are the first aboriginal, indigenous peoples of the heartland of the Hallstatt Nordics (or 'Nordids').
They are made up of distinct NATIONALITIES of which North Americans, nordish or otherwise, are definitely not a part. Many of these posters are deluded people who have never left the USA and actually believe they would be welcomed with open arms by the true northern Europeans in Europe just because they have the same skin colour. Scandinavians who are proud of their unique culture probably don´t care too much for Americans, Canadians and other foreign nations.
This is an interesting point, that preserving the individual cultures throughout the North of Europe -- and the regional cultures among Northern European-descended Americans -- maybe a more workable goal, one that would appeal to more people in their day-to-day lives than a more ontological conception of Nordishness.
As one of the commentators on this thread previously pointed out on the question of sovereign, autonomous territories in a future White ethnostate, this might be more realistically actualized if it is based on ethnicity, culture and religion, rather than than some kind of pan-Northern European identity.
Of course this kind of already exists in America today. For example, among the large North Euro ethnic groups in America today, the Germans and Scandinavians strongly predominate in the upper-Midwest and Midwest, most of whom are Lutheran or -- while English, Scottish and Scots-Irish strongly predominate in the Southeast, most of them being Baptist and other varieties of Fundamentalist Christianity.
Rassenhygieniker said...
Swarthoids want to destroy Northwest European to dispell their inferiority by lowering the standards of Whiteness to their levels and hence make themselves the "New Whites".
Not a fair or accurate explanation there.
As we have seen, one could say the same thing with Nordishness (or your largely-geographic, 'autochthonous' definition of what defines a Nordic)
In other words: "Non or less Nordic (or as you call it, 'Nordid') pan-Northern Europeanists want to destroy, or at least appreciably distort, the traditional definition of Nordic to dispel their inferiority by lowering the standards of Nordicness to their levels and hence make themselves the "New Nordics".
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/wise.htm
"Why don't you just respond to the article I have written and send me the response, bitch?
The points I made are mostly analytical, not a matter of how many Jewish individuals you can dig up who are prominent in media. William Pierce (whose body is being consumed by worms right about now, as is well deserved) did the ultimate research on this, and it meant nothing for the reasons pointed out in my article, among others. All of that info is irrelevant unless you a priori assume Jews are evil, which of course you do. Once you explain the statistical analysis I offered as wrong, and why it's wrong (i.e., the proper analysis is Jews in media/finance versus Jews in NY, since that is the hub of both industries where almost all the powerful players reside), then maybe I will listen to your ranting.
Until then you are just a punk ass nazi bitch, with nothing of value to say. Start the race war you piece of shit, or shut the fuck up.
Love and kisses
Tim Wise
Oh, BTW, you should know something: federal law prohibits you from publishing any private email correspondence without the express permission of the author. I can send you the statute if you 'd like it. I most definitely do not give you permission to post or distribute anything I write to you (sorta like the part where I called you a punk ass nazi bitch, you punk ass nazi bitch), in any form. So, if you decide to print this email in whole or in part, I will file charges on your punk ass nazi bitch ass, and I'm sure I can find a nice Jewish federal prosecutor to charge you.
Hugs, Tim"
____________________________________
Now, what Tim Wise wrote pretty much sound exactly like the kind of diatribe our resident swarthoids would come up with, eh? What Tim Wise wrote, could very well have been written by Mudginald, Cyd, Sir Infamous and the other pletoria of anti-White nonwhites.
Judaism and Meridionalism, of different tribes, but same ideology.
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/wise.htm
"Why don't you just respond to the article I have written and send me the response, bitch?
The points I made are mostly analytical, not a matter of how many Jewish individuals you can dig up who are prominent in media. William Pierce (whose body is being consumed by worms right about now, as is well deserved) did the ultimate research on this, and it meant nothing for the reasons pointed out in my article, among others. All of that info is irrelevant unless you a priori assume Jews are evil, which of course you do. Once you explain the statistical analysis I offered as wrong, and why it's wrong (i.e., the proper analysis is Jews in media/finance versus Jews in NY, since that is the hub of both industries where almost all the powerful players reside), then maybe I will listen to your ranting.
Until then you are just a punk ass nazi bitch, with nothing of value to say. Start the race war you piece of shit, or shut the fuck up.
Love and kisses
Tim Wise
Oh, BTW, you should know something: federal law prohibits you from publishing any private email correspondence without the express permission of the author. I can send you the statute if you 'd like it. I most definitely do not give you permission to post or distribute anything I write to you (sorta like the part where I called you a punk ass nazi bitch, you punk ass nazi bitch), in any form. So, if you decide to print this email in whole or in part, I will file charges on your punk ass nazi bitch ass, and I'm sure I can find a nice Jewish federal prosecutor to charge you.
Hugs, Tim"
Now, what Tim Wise wrote pretty much sound exactly like the kind of diatribe our resident swarthoids would come up with, eh? What Tim Wise wrote, could very well have been written by Mudginald, Cyd, Sir Infamous and the other pletoria of anti-White nonwhites.
Judaism and Meridionalism, of different tribes, but same ideology.
"Anonymous said...
Are you sure about this Rass?"
Yes, all Southern Europeans are Mediterraneans, but not all Mediterraneans are Mediterranid.
Same as all Northern Europeans are Nordics, but not all Nordics are Nordid.
If you can not comprehend such a simple concept even after it was detailed, then that is your problem.
"Anonymous said...
Going by the definition of autochthonous to define who/what is Nordic, then this would obviously have to include the indigenous Lapps or Sami of Scandinavia as 'Nordic' as well, since they are the first aboriginal, indigenous peoples of the heartland of the Hallstatt Nordics (or 'Nordids')."
Indo-Germanics came from Western Asia around the regions of the Caspian sea and settled in Central Europe for a time and later on pushed on their expansion unto Northern Europe.
Uralics came from beyond the Ural Mountains, the result of this mongoloid expansion mongolized the Paleolithic makeup of Siberia and Northern Russia to Finally arrive in Northern Europe and mix with the Easternmost Indo-Germanics who had settled in Northern Europe such as what is now Finland, Karelia and so on.
The Indo-Germanics are part of the Caucasoid expansion unto Europe while the Uralics are part of the Mongoloid expansion unto Europe.So the only "aboriginals" of Europe were the Paleolithics.
And as I said a couple times already Nordic is not the same as Nordid, so there is no "or".
"Of course this kind of already exists in America today. For example, among the large North Euro ethnic groups in America today, the Germans and Scandinavians strongly predominate in the upper-Midwest and Midwest, most of whom are Lutheran or -- while English, Scottish and Scots-Irish strongly predominate in the Southeast, most of them being Baptist and other varieties of Fundamentalist Christianity. "
That´s true. It should also be noted that "intrusion" of southern European decendants in these areas of the US, outside of a couple of larger cities, is minimal.
If you want 'pop science' there's this:
"European men with darker, sultry features from countries like Spain, Italy, Portugal, and France" are most attractive
http://www.rooshv.com/totem-pole-of-race-attractiveness
This is one case where science and 'pop science' converge on the same fundamental truth.
I'll disregard the puerile Euromed chauvinism, so unfounded and ungenerous, but I would like other commenters to warn if they are giving links to moral perverts.
This Roosh fellow pretends to be an American, despite clearly being some Persian or north Indian man, neither northern nor southern European. I noticed that contrary to his worldwide boasts about female beauty he focuses solely on Eurowhite countries, particularly in Europe itself. Aren't Persian and Indian girls fascinating enough for him? Why is it the ogling nonwhite lechers thump their chests for the honour of their nations, but do not care to seek out their own women for company?
His acolytes urge him to play the tall, swarthy ladies' man which he confesses has been to no avail thus far. From observation the minority of white women who have "tall, dark and handsome" idolatry on the brain are attracted to European white men with darkish hair and a sun tan not rough, hirsute Arabs. Why do the Moroccans, Turks and Middle-Easterners keep peddling these delusions about being exotic or attractive to white women when the covers of romance dime novels prove an altogether different truth?
"Anonymous said...
Why do the Moroccans, Turks and Middle-Easterners keep peddling these delusions about being exotic or attractive to white women when the covers of romance dime novels prove an altogether different truth?"
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.” - Adolf Hitler
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." - Joseph Goebbels
"There's nothing so absurd that if you repeat it often enough, people will believe it." - William James
Swarthoids and sandniggers...
Yes, all Southern Europeans are Mediterraneans, but not all Mediterraneans are Mediterranid.
Same as all Northern Europeans are Nordics, but not all Nordics are Nordid.
If you can not comprehend such a simple concept even after it was detailed, then that is your problem.
Words of 'wisdom' from our conjuring resident 'anthropologist' -- so wise in fact that I never even heard such definitions from anyone else (anything to make oneself believe the obvious contrary).
Rassenhygieniker is quite the, um, 'expert' on sub-racial differences and classification, especially of Mediterraneans.
Maybe he got all this 'experience' from personally spending a good deal of time in Turkish prisons.
Same as all Northern Europeans are Nordics, but not all Nordics are Nordid.
Only in your wishful imagination.
And just who came up with the term 'Nordid' vs. Nordic? The SPNA? So many anthropologists, and even most traditional Nordicist writers don't use the 'Nordid' term, nor claim that all Northern Europeans are Nordic.
Again, would the native, aboriginal Northern European Scandinavian Lapps or Sami qualify under this conjectured definition as Nordic as well?
If you can not comprehend such a simple concept even after it was detailed, then that is your problem.
I think your the one with the comprehension problem, since here is the official definition of Nordic Europe -
The Nordic countries make up a region in Northern Europe and the North Atlantic which consists of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden and their associated territories which include the Faroe Islands, Greenland, Svalbard and Åland. Scandinavia is sometimes used as a synonym for the Nordic countries,[1] although within the Nordic countries the terms are considered distinct.
The region's five nation-states and three autonomous regions share much common history as well as common traits in their respective societies, such as political systems and the Nordic model. ...
But good to see you have no racial standards whatsoever, which is not unexpected coming from a muditerranean.
...
How is it dehumanization to point out their darker pigmentation? Are you ashamed of it? That's your problem.
Conversely then, are you 'ashamed' of the Mediterranean racial elements found in parts of Northern Europe, particularly the British Isles?
Atlanto-Mediterraneans
According to Carleton Coon:
“Toward the end of the Neolithic period, the western Mediterranean countries were invaded by seafarers of a tall, exceptionally long-headed Mediterranean variety; some of these invaders passed through the Straits of Gibraltar, whence they also invaded the British Isles and Scandinavia.”
These invaders were the Atlanto-Mediterraneans. The Atlanto-Mediterranean type is part of the Large Mediterranean family together with Corded and Irano-Afghan types. Its bony parts are not as pronounced as those of Cordeds or Irano-Afghans and its forehead is comparatively broader in view of vault height. It is closer to the earliest discovered forms of the Mediterranean race than any other type.
The taxon, coined by Deniker, is given to the fact that seafarers of whom this type was representative invaded Europe from the Atlantic during the Neolithic; alternatively the term “Megalithic” is used for the type’s association with this culture.
...
http://amorsite.110mb.com/index-filer/AtlantoMediterraneans.htm
Conversely then, are you 'ashamed' of the Mediterranean racial elements found in parts of Northern Europe, particularly the British Isles?
Why would I be ashamed, it has nothing to do with me.
The fact that there are already some Mediterranean elements in Northern Europe just means that preservation is all the more important. However North Atlantids are not purely Mediterranean and have Nordish ancestry already. They're sort of "grandfathered in" if you will.
Just like how Obama has "some" white ancestry??
119-121 are by the demented imbecile Kulaks Never Learn.
The thing about Mediterraneans, Jews, and other related groups is that they do tend to bring 'civilization,' commerce, and so on wherever they go, but not always a sustainable, long-term, or even a very desirable civilization (just look at the monstrosity of the modern USA, which is now very much Med/Jew dominated in most spheres).
All areas which have been inhabited by Mediterraneans eventually become deserts, literal deserts...hence the insult 'sandnigger' often hurled toward them even if they do not have any literal African/mixed etc ancestry (and the top-caste Meds definitely do not). Look at all of the countries surrounding the entire Mediterranean littoral: places such as the nations of the Middle East and Near East (plus most of Iran and Afghanistan), Italy, Greece, Spain, North Africa, Turkey, the Balkans to some extent, etc...all areas from which Meds, Jews, Semites, and other related desert races came from are all now mostly barren, desolate wastelands inhabited largely by mass-miscegenated dregs, the descendants of former lower classes or slaves who they brought in to do most of their manual labor at the height of their former empires. Vast urban agglomerations of millions which comprise hundreds square miles are also de-facto deserts since they have been almost entirely paved over and thus had their waterways and soil profiles altered forever - and these areas are nothing if not Med/Jew strongholds.
Meanwhile as the ship of empire is sinking the top-caste Meds and their Jewish helpers start to move on to 'greener pastures,' i.e. new resource and labor-rich Northern Euro majority nations and areas (in modern times North America; Med-ish and Jewish northward push in to Central and Northern Europe with the spread of the Roman Empire; etc.) where they again start the destructive cycle of near-irreversible ecological destruction, overpopulation, mass urbanism/mass miscegenation, etc all over again. In short, there is nothing permanent or sustainable about the Med/Jew way of life - it is all nomadism and herding (livestock herding plus grain growing was their traditional way of life) which eventually turns the temporary 'homeland' in to a desert or semi-desert wasteland...and again, the lower racially mixed lower classes are very often left behind while the top Meds/Jews emigrate to start the same cycle all over again in new areas.
Yes, it is true that the Meds once built great civilizations in many cases, but in the process they wrecked the land permanently, clear-cutting forests, irreversibly eroding and exhausting the soil and pastures via too much livestock grazing and grain production, overpopulating and over-urbanizing landscapes which then depleted resources which lead to a population crunch in due time, and so on.
(continued from above)
Nowadays very little of the things necessary for basic/civilized life - good soil for food, clean freshwater, timber, ore, etc - are to be found in abundance in Med countries because those nations have largely been stripped of everything, leaving them shells of their former selves. The native soils have been exhausted and eroded almost beyond repair, and the food grown therefrom is thus very scarce in nutrients and vitamins which leaves a stunted populace and/or the necessity to import food. Many of the areas which border the Mediterranean Sea (and in the Middle East) used to be lush, green, very fertile areas of the world, but eventually the Meds came in and over time those areas became outright deserts due to over-farming and over-ranching, clear-cutting forests, overpopulation, soil erosion, mass urbanization, bringing in a non White slave caste for manual labor, and so on. Now those nations are, as stated before, mere shadows of their former selves due to insanely haphazard empire building of the past.
The problem is that in modern times, especially in heavily Med/Jew America, these unsustainable values have now been (often forcibly) exported worldwide and threaten to wreck the environment on a heretofore unseen, unknown, and likely catastrophic scale, insanely wasting and mismanaging insane amounts of resources and polluting the air/water/soil/etc just so the majority can go shopping and watch TV and stuff our faces, clearcut forests and waste valuable soil fertility to feed mass-miscegenated/mass-urban non White slave-dregs, and eventually even cause a wholesale collapse of the global socio-economic system due to civilizational over-reach. This was not a major problem when Med/Jew empires were only a few hundred thousand as in the ancient Middle/Near East, or even a few million as with the Roman Empire, but now in the 21st Century the Med/Jew/American empire reaches worldwide and in to the lives of billions and there just aren't enough top minds to keep this kind of unsustainable and pointless racket going much longer, nor should we.
The Meds and Jews have much to teach us Northern Euros since they did become 'civilized' long before we did in terms of writing, agriculture, proto-science, architecture, art, cities, and so on, but we also have a whole lot to teach them as well about not soiling your own nests, about taking better care of the environment for true sustainability and permanency (instead of leading a nomadic life chasing money), not allowing 3rd worlders to come in and serve as manual laboring slaves so that they eventually out-breed you and take over the territory, and so on.
However, the main question is: when/if the USA continues to decline and the Meds/Jews need to move on to new nations (greener pastures), where will they go next? Who will accept them for the next round after leaving such a trail of socioeconomic and environmental devastation in their wake?
Italy, Greece, Spain, ... Turkey, the Balkans to some extent, etc...all areas from which Meds, Jews, Semites, and other related desert races came from are all now mostly barren, desolate wastelands inhabited largely by mass-miscegenated dregs, the descendants of former lower classes or slaves who they brought in to do most of their manual labor at the height of their former empires.
Spoken by someone who has clearly never left the confines of his basement.
but we also have a whole lot to teach them as well
But, according to your own logic, doesn't our "racial makeup" preclude our imbibing any such lessons?
Look, this all just so much bullshit. It's one thing to speculate about the influence that heritable traits have had throughout history but something else completely to insist that since environment/"culture" can't account for everything it accounts for nothing. (I'm surprised you didn't find some way to work in a Med/Jew angle on ending the last ice age...or have I spoken too soon?) Just think how many of your own very best people you're causing to remain wary of racialism based on the tendency of such loose thinking alone (ie to say nothing of the more formidable moral hang-ups they tend to have).
Just as the anti-white responds to the white preservationist by harping on "inferiorities" of whites, Kulaks Never Learn responds to the Nordish preservationist by harping on "inferiorities" of Northern Europeans. What they don't understand is that it's about our preservation as a people, not who is "inferior." Genocidal Kulaks Never Learn believes Northern Europeans are worthless scum who don't deserve to survive as a unique entity because they're not "perfect." Does he have the same standard for Southern Europeans?
True enough. But you started it, so it's only natural he'd feel inclined to hit back.
Look, your heightened emotional state is blinding you to human nature. You're sullen, anxious and depressed and you demand the world understand why. But the world chugs along happily indifferent. If you'd have the world listen you need to give it a reason to.
In the specific instance of the kulaks, the cyds etc, the best response is to say, "You think you're dooming us? By dooming us, you only doom yourselves. The reasons we find ourselves in this predicament are manifold, and there is no end to the ways in which blame can be parceled out, thus all is forgiven. Help us and you'll help yourselves. Doom us and your fate will be likewise sealed."
Subniggers versus Sandniggers:
http://www.youtube.com/v/BlXk4ogvrY4
This could have very well been filmed in Argentina, Iraq or Alger, swarthoid countries are all the same and as usual you can not even make a distinction between the "immigrant" swarthoids and the "autochthonous" swarthoids.
*Algeria.
http://www.youtube.com/v/BlXk4ogvrY4
This could have very well been filmed in Argentina, Iraq or Alger, swarthoid countries are all the same and as usual you can not even make a distinction between the "immigrant" swarthoids and the "autochthonous" swarthoids.
Ideologically I still support the Greeks and other European outliers, historically they've been buffers to non-European admixture.
The scene with all of those white plastic chairs flying is humorous.
119-121 are by the demented imbecile Kulaks Never Learn.
So says the heroic online cyber-warrior MGLS, who, from the bowels of his basement relentlessly battles the 'enemies of 'Nordishism', for having the audacity to cite actual Nordicist writers and anthropologists, challenging his very selective worldview of Nordicism (and childhood fantasy of being a 'pure Norse warrior').
Uh... .
Why would I be ashamed, it has nothing to do with me.
Yeah, suuure thing, Thor.
The fact that there are already some Mediterranean elements in Northern Europe just means that preservation is all the more important.
Interesting admission on your part there.
So how would you to go about seperating the darker sub-races of Northern Europe in a 'Nordish' ethnostate that is really concerned with the preservation of the fairer and blonder 'Nordid' sub-races?
However North Atlantids are not purely Mediterranean and have Nordish ancestry already. They're sort of "grandfathered in" if you will.
Please read actual Nordicist writers before you make these kind of ego-soothing claims -
A notion on Lundman's North-Atlantid race [Archive] - Skadi Forum
The Irish are still of the same racial make-up as of the English conquest hundreds of years ago or in other words mostly North-Atlantid and somewhat Nordic. The former race dominates the poorer parts, which is the mountains of the west and the south, as well as some bog parts of central Ireland. The North-Atlantid may be seen as the pre-Keltic original population, which spoke a non-Indo-European language, a fact which is regarded as confirmed by the extremely distinctive linguistic development of the Irish langugage.
Lundman, Bertil (1988). Jordens Folkstammar. P 59.
http://forums.skadi.net/archive/index.php/t-72185.html
However North Atlantids are not purely Mediterranean and have Nordish ancestry already. They're sort of "grandfathered in" if you will.
(*Meant to italicize this quote from anonymous above).
Anyway, as we have seen, the North Atlantid sub-race is not a Nordic sub-race. Per Lundmen, they were not even Indo-European or Indo-Germanic speakers, and are the earliest inhabitants of Western and coastal Europe that even preceeded the Kelts.
The Atlantid sub-race, incidentally, is not only found in the British Isles, as some mistakenly claim, but all along the Atlantic seaboard.
Atlantids, identified by their primary haplogroup R1b, are found heavily in northern and coastal Spain, Portugal, France, even in parts of western Norway.
So it is mendacious to claim that British Atlantids are Nordish (or Rassy going so far to claim they're 'Nordic') and deny the same terminology and classification for Spanish, French and Basque Atlantids.
Atlantic Europe.
Atlantic Europe is a geographical and anthropological term for the western portion of Europe which borders the Atlantic Ocean. The term may refer to the idea of Atlantic Europe as a cultural unit and/or as an biogeographical region.
It comprises the western (Atlantic) part of Iberia (Spain and Portugal), north and western France, Ireland and the United Kingdom. ...
&
Haplogroup R1b (Y-DNA) Map
"Med/Jew Watcher" said...
Please name me the Italian, Portuguese, Greek, or Spainish equivalent of George Soros, Tim Wise, Haim Saban, et al...???
So it is mendacious to claim that British Atlantids are Nordish (or Rassy going so far to claim they're 'Nordic') and deny the same terminology and classification for Spanish, French and Basque Atlantids.
You're confused, a North Atlantid in Britain is not the same as an Atlantid in Spain. There is a similarity in skull shape, not total ancestry. It would be the same as saying that Spanish Mediterraneans are the same as Arab and Jewish Mediterraneans.
"Anonymous said...
So it is mendacious to claim that British Atlantids are Nordish (or Rassy going so far to claim they're 'Nordic')"
As I said, if you can not comprehend the difference between a racial anthropologic term such as "Nordid" and a territorial ethnologic term such as "Nordic", than that is your problem.
____________________________________
"Anonymous said...
Please name me the Italian, Portuguese, Greek, or Spainish equivalent of George Soros, Tim Wise, Haim Saban, et al...???"
To name a few:
Leonardo Facco
Giorgio Fidenato
Chiara Lubich
Joy Behar
James Groppi
Michelangelo Signorile
Arturo Giovannitti
Arturo Alonso
Álvaro Gil-Robles
Feel free to add more.
"Anonymous said...
You're confused, a North Atlantid in Britain is not the same as an Atlantid in Spain. There is a similarity in skull shape, not total ancestry. It would be the same as saying that Spanish Mediterraneans are the same as Arab and Jewish Mediterraneans."
The Arabs/Southern Europeans are in the Small Mediterranean/Gracile Mediterranean category and the Jews/Sumerians/Assyrians are in the Armenoid/Taurid category, all belonging to the Mediterranean race.
"The Arabid race was thought to be predominant in Arabia, a major element in lebanon, Syria and important in Iraq; and is also held to be a predominant element in Mizrahi Jews by Richard McCulloch. The Arabid race was distinguished from the West-Mediterranean race almost only by a nevertheless unusually large number of small, but very characteristic facial traits. These include the almond eyes, the "Semitic smile" (conditioned by unusually deep Fossa canina), etc. This race had in earlier times a broader-formed Syrid subrace, which was found among the farmers of the "Fertile Crescent"."
Southern Europeans = Sandniggers.
You're confused, a North Atlantid in Britain is not the same as an Atlantid in Spain. There is a similarity in skull shape, not total ancestry. It would be the same as saying that Spanish Mediterraneans are the same as Arab and Jewish Mediterraneans.
Regardless, the Atlantids in Britain are not Nordic, but the pre-Indo-European darker races that pre-dated the Nordic invaders.
Anyway, as the map of Atlantic/Atlantid shows above, there is significant R1b genes to be found in northern and western Spain and France -- as much as you all may want to deny it. So the northern Spanish and Basques have just as much right to be counted as Nordish by your definitions then.
"Anonymous said...
So the northern Spanish and Basques have just as much right to be counted as Nordish by your definitions then."
They can not be "Nordish" since they are not Northern Europeans, idiot.
The Arabs/Southern Europeans are in the Small Mediterranean/Gracile Mediterranean category and the Jews/Sumerians/Assyrians are in the Armenoid/Taurid category, all belonging to the Mediterranean race.
Not all Southern Europeans are of the same sub-race or of the small/gracile Mediterranean variety (just like not all Northern Europeans are of the same sub-race).
As it has been amply demonstrated, the Gracile Mediterranean strains are predominant in the south of Spain (and Southern Europe) -- the northern tier of many Southern European nations (and Spain) are more of the Atlantid and Atlanto-Mediterranean sub-race -- very similar sub-races and haplogroups as what many here would deem 'Nordish'.
One mo' time -
[Atlantic Europe] comprises the western (Atlantic) part of Iberia (Spain and Portugal), north and western France, Ireland and the United Kingdom. ....
They can not be "Nordish" since they are not Northern Europeans, idiot.
This stupid statement shows what a lying shithead you are, since even Richard McCulloch, the progenitor of 'Nordishism' allows for some Southern Europeans to be counted as 'Nordish' (although of course he appreciably undercounts the Nordic racial elements of this region).
It would be the same as saying that Spanish Mediterraneans are the same as Arab and Jewish Mediterraneans.
Rather hypocritical to say this since, ironically, is what so many of you guys actually do and say on a routine basis (you know - the "all south euros are 'Meds' and all Meds are 'swarthoids' schtick) in your ongoing (and misplaced) hatred of Southern Europeans.
Some exemplar of a predominantly Atlantid individual from Asturias (Northern Spain):
http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/1021/r54r54.jpg
Is this look typical for Iberia either North or South? No, this look is more typical amongst Central European Germanics and British Islanders.
The mediterranid arabian strain is akin to nigger blood, so even if some Southern European is not completly gracile mediterranid (such as an Alpinizied Mediterranid), typically the mediterranid pigmentation and complexion has the upper hand. This is why Southern Europe no matter the race is unilaterraly dark eyed, swarthy and dark haired.
Ideologically I still support the Greeks and other European outliers, historically they've been buffers to non-European admixture.
That's an interesting comment. What does this ideological support consist of (in concrete terms)?
While I appreciate the gesture, if you're going to be serious about race, then you have to be serious about race. These "outlier" types, whether they care about race or whiteness or not, are sufficiently acculturated and sufficiently racially similar to you that friendships are not at all uncommon. No different to Jews in this. And just like Jews they can be absolutely relied upon (well, 9 times out of 10) to turn a conversation or a talking point away from "racism," which they regard as just the worst the thing in the world.
It's the hypocrisy of that's most disgusting. However much it may have to do with any of their actual feelings or concerns about niggers or whatever, it's outweighed by a margin of 10:1 by their concern with your attitude toward themselves. Basically, they know damn fucking well they don't really fit in, not into a northern white society that takes its race seriously, so if race is openly acknowledged to matter they're freaked out by the thought that whatever racial taunts they "suffered" through (invariably blown WAY out of proportion to any actual harm done) had some substance to it. Most people, it seems, just can't handle that thought.
Again, it's not just your greeks or jews who act this way. It's anyone. It's just that these fringe outlier types are the most likely out of all racial others to move in white circles, so their anti-ness tends to exert more influence.
I've got this little pencil-necked faggot of a cousin like this. Totally clams up at race talk. Shuts down completely. Or responds with the most idiotic irrelevancies you can imagine. So we all must agree to drown in this mess because the little faggot can't handle having being called a dago. As if there's anything actually wrong with being one. Or actually wrong with being anything. The fact of difference per se is easily sufficient to want to part ways with people without addling that desire with proclamations (regardless of accuracy) about the immutable deficiencies of others.
"Anonymous said...
This stupid statement shows what a lying shithead you are, since even Richard McCulloch, the progenitor of 'Nordishism' allows for some Southern Europeans to be counted as 'Nordish' (although of course he appreciably undercounts the Nordic racial elements of this region)."
I will attempt to explain this to you, one last time.
Nordic is a territorial ethnological term, a Southern European no matter his race can not be a Nordic since Nordic means Northern (European).
Nordish also would be interpreted as "North(ern)-ish", wich encompass Northern (Europeans) and related (Northern-like).
While Nordid is a racial anthropologic term who is traditionally associated Nordic and Nordish, but not all the time.
Here a Nordid afghan who is (obviously) neither Nordic nor Nordish:
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/4507/r76r76.jpg
Nordic is a territorial ethnological term, a Southern European no matter his race can not be a Nordic since Nordic means Northern (European).
OK Rass, then by this definition the ancient Greeks and Romans Nordicists love to claim credit for as being Nordic are not then Nordic no longer.
Glad you clarified that.
*BTW - you still have not directly answered the question that if 'Nordic' is merely a 'territorial ethnological term' (and not a racial one) representative of 'autochthonous' Northern Europeans, ARE THE LAPPS AND SAMI THEREFORE 'NORDICS' AS WELL???
The mediterranid arabian strain is akin to nigger blood, so even if some Southern European is not completly gracile mediterranid (such as an Alpinizied Mediterranid), typically the mediterranid pigmentation and complexion has the upper hand. This is why Southern Europe no matter the race is unilaterraly dark eyed, swarthy and dark haired.
Another 'wopper' of a lie from our swarthy Scottish friend.
As it was pointed out, the northern part of Southern European countries is not 'Mediterranid Arabic' - or many times even all that 'Med' - but (racially) a blend of Nordic, Alpine, Dinaric, and some (actual) Mediterranean (as the picture you posted of the Spanish Asturian man attested to).
Hence that is why McCulloch (even though he underestimates), and all other sane people and reputable anthropologists, recognize the Nordic (or 'Nordid', as you cunningly call it) racial elements among Southern Europeans.
As well, McCulloch always granted that there are Southern Europeans, and South Euro Americans, that are racially assimilable into 'Nordish' American and Northern European societies.
So stop painting with such a (deceitfully) broad brush.
Some exemplar of a predominantly Atlantid individual from Asturias (Northern Spain):
http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/1021/r54r54.jpg
Actually, the Asturian in the picture is more Nordic-looking than Atlantid, as are appreciable numbers of northern Spanish, Portuguese and certainly Italians (not saying they are a majority of the people there, but certainly a not-uncommon plurality of them).
They can not be "Nordish" since they are not Northern Europeans, idiot.
So, we are attempting to preserve geographic regions of people and not genetics? Is that your ingenious claim? LMAO
Americans of NE stock are not in "Northern Europe" either. What about them? LOL
What a fucking idiot.
"Anonymous said...
Actually, the Asturian in the picture is more Nordic-looking than Atlantid"
When you say "Nordic-looking" I assume by this as usual what you really mean is "Nordid-looking", well no he is not for the good reason that if a person like him would be considered "Nordid", there would be no use for the term "Atlantid".
Nordid (Nordid Proper) are persons such as Max von Sydow and Sofia Arkelsten.
Norid (Dinarid/Nordid) are persons such as Boris Romanov and Carolyn Bessette.
Atlantid (Paleo-Atlantid/Nordid) are persons such as Absalom Baird and Kirsty Gallacher.
"Anonymous said...
as are appreciable numbers of northern Spanish, Portuguese and certainly Italians (not saying they are a majority of the people there, but certainly a not-uncommon plurality of them)."
Never been to Portugual, but I have been to Italy and Spain and the population of both country is certainly not "Nordic-looking" nor "Nordid-looking". Typically it is either Alpinid/Mediterranid or Armenoid (or Dinarid)/Mediterranid or just Mediterranid.
There are SOME "Nordish-influenced" (such as the Asturian exemplar) Spaniards and Italians but they are certainly not to be found in "appreciable numbers" and are usually the result of Interethnic mingling (hence why they are traditionally to be found in the Northernmost parts.)
______________________________________________________________________________________
"Anonymous said...
or many times even all that 'Med' - but (racially) a blend of Nordic, Alpine, Dinaric, and some (actual) Mediterranean (as the picture you posted of the Spanish Asturian man attested to)."
Nordid strains are recessive compared to the Mediterranid and Dinarid/Armenoid strains, this is why in almost all cases when you mix Nordish with medish you get medish. One who is tainted with mediterranid blood is condemned to be medish, no matter his race and this is usually quite the rule in Southern Europe, you may point out some exceptions to the rule, but that does not disprove the rule but only reinforces it.
Take Goebbels (mediterranid) who is an exception to the rule from a Nordish point of view, look how alien he looks in contrast with the other individuals:
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/2585/r06r06.jpg
"Perhaps his veins (Goebbels) were tinged with Malay blood from a distant Dutch forebear; his features were not unlike those of an Italian or, his enemies mocked, a Jew. Height only five-foot-four; a figure of Ghandi-like emaciation barely tipping the scales at one hundred pounds; a head too large for his body; a clubfoot for which he was taunted as both man and boy-all the cards seemed stacked against him." - David Irving (1996)
This thread may interest you:
http://forums.skadi.net/showthread.php?t=132898
"Anonymous said...
OK Rass, then by this definition the ancient Greeks and Romans Nordicists love to claim credit for as being Nordic are not then Nordic no longer."
Quite a bit happened since then, the racial makeup of Ancient Italy is not the same as the racial makeup of Modern Italy, this won't change no matter how much Italian-"Americans" and other Sicilians would whine about it.
"Anonymous said...
*BTW - you still have not directly answered the question that if 'Nordic' is merely a 'territorial ethnological term' (and not a racial one) representative of 'autochthonous' Northern Europeans, ARE THE LAPPS AND SAMI THEREFORE 'NORDICS' AS WELL???"
I already did and the answer was:
No, for the reason that I already explained here:
"Indo-Germanics came from Western Asia around the regions of the Caspian sea and settled in Central Europe for a time and later on pushed on their expansion unto Northern Europe.
Uralics came from beyond the Ural Mountains, the result of this mongoloid expansion mongolized the Paleolithic makeup of Siberia and Northern Russia to Finally arrive in Northern Europe and mix with the Easternmost Indo-Germanics who had settled in Northern Europe such as what is now Finland, Karelia and so on.
The Indo-Germanics are part of the Caucasoid expansion unto Europe while the Uralics are part of the Mongoloid expansion unto Europe."
____________________________________
"Cyd said...
So, we are attempting to preserve geographic regions of people and not genetics? Is that your ingenious claim? LMAO
Americans of NE stock are not in "Northern Europe" either. What about them? LOL
What a fucking idiot."
Americans who are of Northwestern European stock and ancestry are Nordish.
Americans who are of Southwestern European stock and ancestry are medish.
Not too hard to understand, "American" is not a racial term, especially not nowadays...
It is about race, ethnicity and ancestry.
Kulaks, why are you such an angry, passive-aggressive little bitch? Why do you obsequiously suck up to people and then turn around and stab them in the back? And why do you post under dozens of bogus names and identities?
Swarthoids are scrounger, like the kikes in Poland, like the Gypsies in Romania, like the Turks in Germany, like the Iraqis in Sweden, like the Maghrebis in France, like the Indians in England, like the niggers in America, like the asians in Canada and so on.
SouthEast Europeans are somewhat related to the Turks, Turks just have a Mongoloid component from the Middle aged Steppe Turkic tribes that is not present in Balkanians or Italians. NOne of those other people we are related to at all.
And c'mon. Comparing Swarthoids to Iraqis or Niggers. At least we create 1st world countries, alb eight not on the level of NorthWestern Europe.
"There appear to be roughly 3 clusters: a relatively tight cluster of Northern Euro wives and NE husbands, and 2 looser clusters of SE wives/SE husbands, and NE wives/SE husbands."
I'm sure this pattern has strengthened over time. Over the years more and more Northern Euro males have had to remain virgins, become gay, or seek Asian wives.
LMFAO, these degenerate Nordic males and their asian fetish, wait until chinks come into this country at vasts numbers which will eventually happen. Add that with their women breeding with Niggers and Mexicans and we know what's going to happen. When you allow niggers to take your women and put up virtually no resistance you know you are a conquered race. : )
Medish males should keep breeding with medish females, but we could also absorb SOME higher stock Nordics into our gene pool. Even i'll admit that will help us. BUT, breeding too much with them we would eventually get absorbed and genetically annihilated since they have far higher numbers. Plus we dont want to become too Nordish, then our women will become mudsharks and our males become liberal queers with long blonde hair.
I'm going to re-post because I forgot to italicize what I was quoting.
Swarthoids are scrounger, like the kikes in Poland, like the Gypsies in Romania, like the Turks in Germany, like the Iraqis in Sweden, like the Maghrebis in France, like the Indians in England, like the niggers in America, like the Asians in Canada and so on.
SouthEast Europeans are somewhat related to the Turks, Turks just have a Mongoloid component from the Middle aged Steppe Turkic tribes that is not present in Balkanians or Italians. NOne of those other people we are related to at all.
And c'mon. Comparing Swarthoids to Iraqis or Niggers. At least we create 1st world countries, alb eight not on the level of NorthWestern Europe.
"There appear to be roughly 3 clusters: a relatively tight cluster of Northern Euro wives and NE husbands, and 2 looser clusters of SE wives/SE husbands, and NE wives/SE husbands."
I'm sure this pattern has strengthened over time. Over the years more and more Northern Euro males have had to remain virgins, become gay, or seek Asian wives.
LMFAO, these degenerate Nordic males and their Asian fetish, wait until chinks come into this country at vasts numbers which will eventually happen. Add that with their women breeding with Negroids and Mexicans and we know what's going to happen. When you allow Negroids to take your women and put up virtually no resistance you know you are a conquered race. : )
Medish males should keep breeding with medish females, but we could also absorb SOME higher stock Nordics into our gene pool. Even i'll admit that will help us. BUT, breeding too much with them we would eventually get absorbed and genetically annihilated since they have far higher numbers. Plus we don't want to become too Nordish, then our women will become mudsharks and our males become liberal queers with long blonde hair.
I'm still dumbfounded how how Nords became so militaristically powerful centuries ago, and just ran though continents exterminating the the natives, unlike the completely irresponsible Spaniards who created the montrosity known as Latin America. Obviously today's Nords descend from the majority of cowards and pussies who survived the world wars and other huge Nordic wars throughout history like the American Civil War, natural selection actually favored more cowardly effeminate types for what ever reason. The result is modern Nordic male that plays video games, is a Barack Obama supporter, and has an Asian fetish.
Like the jew and the negro, the swarthoid demands the "right" to associate with people who want to be left alone. He insists on disrespectfully forcing himself into places where he is not welcome.
Just look at this blog. The swarthoids are absolutely obsessed with it. They're totally bent out of shape that the "cool kids" don't want anything to do with them. They desperately want to cling to Nordics like leeches and parasites. The swarthoids want to sink their fangs into Northern Europeans and suck out their life force.
Why do Mudicist swarthoids refuse to go back to their homelands? Because despite their braggadocio, they have deep-seated feelings of inferiority.
Sir Infamous LMFAO, these degenerate Nordic males and their Asian fetish
First off, you have a really dumb name. Nextly, it's your fellow mediots over at anthroscape who have Asian fetishes, namely, Caudium, Manu, Beppe, who else?
Why do Mudicist swarthoids refuse to go back to their homelands? Because despite their braggadocio, they have deep-seated feelings of inferiority.
If you're asking me if NorthWestern Europeans create more industrious societies than Southern Europeans i'll tell you it's a fact. I mean obviously. And trust me, America is going to look like Brazil soon enough so I'm going to try and go back to my homeland if I ever get the chance.
Anyways, if you were so superior you wouldn't be getting conquered by Mexicans and you wouldn't be dominated by Jews.
I'll admit when I was younger it used to piss me off when I would see a white (as in typical Nordic white woman) with a negroid, but now I just laugh at it. "Not my race" I say to myself, and not a race that has any future.
Just look at this blog. The swarthoids are absolutely obsessed with it. They're totally bent out of shape that the "cool kids" don't want anything to do with them. They desperately want to cling to Nordics like leeches and parasites. The swarthoids want to sink their fangs into Northern Europeans and suck out their life force.
This blog was created by a guy who's obsessed with Southern Europeans and Southern European history/culture and a particular Southern European named Racial Reality. He even created a Kempian/Earlsonian'toned webpage called "Refuting Racial Myths" entirely on Southern Europeans.
I came over briefly about a month ago just cause a guy on anthroscape informed me of this fact, and I wanted to check it out. If you want my opinion, some of the stuff he talks about is kinda interesting...like "Race and physical attraction".
If you think i'm obsessed with Nordic preservation or pan European white nationalism or whatever then you're wrong. Although unfortunately there are some rather pathetic Southern Europeans who are.
"Why do Mudicist swarthoids refuse to go back to their homelands? Because despite their braggadocio, they have deep-seated feelings of inferiority."
The problem is the Jews and other mudishit swarthoids have taken over and transformed America into a swarthoid nation, no better than Sicily, Malta or Madeira! Therefore swarthoids are now at home here in America and that FUCKING SUCKS!
I'll admit when I was younger it used to piss me off when I would see a white (as in typical Nordic white woman) with a negroid, but now I just laugh at it. "Not my race" I say to myself, and not a race that has any future.
Kindly, do not speak for all of us, or even, any of us. Just for yourself and make sure you specify that. This sort of behavior is not only counter productive but downright childish. Your attitude is worse than the hardcore loons that frequent these sites.
Just what is your "race"? Be specific, if possible.
If you think i'm obsessed with Nordic preservation or pan European white nationalism or whatever then you're wrong. Although unfortunately there are some rather pathetic Southern Europeans who are.
Then what purpose do you serve by spouting off inanities like you do? Did you have some issues with NE guys growing up? Did the girls not cozy up to you? You readily admit the NE derived societies are better, yet you blabber on like a fool with a wounded ego.
I'm SE, just so there are no misconceptions. My argument is with the diametric opposite retards from yourself that visit this site and not with all NE.
Americans who are of Northwestern European stock and ancestry are Nordish.
Americans who are of Southwestern European stock and ancestry are medish.
Not too hard to understand, "American" is not a racial term, especially not nowadays...
It is about race, ethnicity and ancestry.
Moron, I know all that. It is you who twists himself into a pretzel in order to include yourself into the Nordic category, despite barely hanging on genetically speaking. You are the one who conflates genetic and geographic to include yourself and exclude "sub-niggers" even though your tribe is not even Indo-European. Dumbass.
The question was:
Please name me the Italian, Portuguese, Greek, or Spainish equivalent of George Soros, Tim Wise, Haim Saban, et al...???"
Rassa answers with:
To name a few:
Leonardo Facco
Giorgio Fidenato
Chiara Lubich
Joy Behar
James Groppi
Michelangelo Signorile
Arturo Giovannitti
Arturo Alonso
Álvaro Gil-Robles
LMAO
Yes, Leonardo Facco is just like George Soros. Twins, even. Joy Behar too! LOL
Then what purpose do you serve by spouting off inanities like you do? Did you have some issues with NE guys growing up? Did the girls not cozy up to you? You readily admit the NE derived societies are better, yet you blabber on like a fool with a wounded ego.
What inanities are you speaking of? Everything i say is a fact, retard. I wouldn't say i have a real problem with NE guys, although i realize i'm different and if real Nordic supremacists ever gained control it would certainly not be good for S. Europeans.
And yes, Northern Europeans create more industrious societies, if you don't agree then then go look at GDP per capita statistics. Do I think it has to do with genetics, yeah I'd say in plays a role. S. Europe needs a eugenics program, we don't need to merge with a race like the modern Northern Europeans.
The difference between you and I is that you are desperate to be and merge with Nordics while I am not, you are a coward. This would be pretty stupid long term anyways, since their nations have no real demographic future.
You want to merge with a dying race? Yeah fully assimilate yourself in with them and then watch as their entire civilization crumbles. lol
NO doubt about it, in N. America and N. Western Europe the whites will be minorities by the time you have grand children. If you really care about YOUR race, you will move back to Southern Europe
And yes you are a clown and you are pathetic, not only to the Northern Europeans here who want nothing to do with you, but to Southern Europeans as well.
"Please please please Mr. Nordish preservationists can I be part of your society? But what about the dark haired Britons? If they are in can I be too? We are ONE, EUROPE IS ONE I have no racial pride or racial loyalty of my own, I don't want to work on and help develop own race or sub race, I just want to merge with the Nordics even though my blood had nothing to do with their achievements."
-Cyd
Honestly I can't think of a blonde or Nordish woman that is as obnoxious and disgusting as Joy Behar and Nancy Pelosi, who many people would consider to be Jewish without knowing their ancestry is Italian. You won't see that Latino-loving nitwit Jack Ryan talking about them though.
If you're asking me if NorthWestern Europeans create more industrious societies than Southern Europeans i'll tell you it's a fact. I mean obviously. And trust me, America is going to look like Brazil soon enough so I'm going to try and go back to my homeland if I ever get the chance.
What do you mean "get the chance"? What's stopping you doing it right now? Funds? Economic opportunities over there?
I tried it. 2003 and 2006. I think it's hard to make a satisfying life there on your own, even if you have family. It's great that you're around your own people, but their cultural attitudes wear you down. Genetic determinists can deny it all they want, but culture matters; and culturally we're formed differently than our old world progenitors. We just are.
The trick is to get enough of us to want to go back so that we can form English-speaking enclaves.
What force/s might be harnessed to accomplish such a task? An attractive force would be the governments of our ancestral lands offering their support -- if they "need immigrants" (the greatest crock of shit ever foisted on a population) better to take us than a pack of feral afghans or niggers. A repulsive force would be the nordy natives of our adopted homelands getting fed up and throwing us out.
Personally, I think separation/partition has more going for it -- no one wants to be thought of so poorly as to be considered a worthy candidate for expulsion, but it's not unreasonable to think he'd be amenable to separation, particularly if he sees something in it for himself. But even if separation/partition is a no-go, I still support "WNs"/nords -- they're the only ones making any sense about what is good in life. (Although the nutters among them are definitely wrong that other human groups are 'hate-worthy' per se. It's familiarity and intimate settings that breed contempt. Distance-between-us and pursuing separate destinies merits a kindly, not a hateful, attitude.)
Lastly, it's understandable that you'd want to hit back at some fuckwit like rassen or that kook who writes about the "cool kids" -- pfft. I can't think of one person I know who would consistently opt for a night out at a bar full of nords over a bar full of greeks or itals. (I'm talking australia, where the nords are seriously, seriously nordy) You might do it occasionally for a change, because they can good for a laugh and a piss up. But in the main there's an unquestionable preference for one's own.
Honestly I can't think of a blonde or Nordish woman that is as obnoxious and disgusting as Joy Behar
Yeah, she's a true fucking idiot. The sort of reflexively, unthinkingly antiracist dipshit almost certain to be solely or overwhelmingly concerned with what "racism" means about her rather than the nigger darlings she claims to oh, just love (all the while quietly sequestering herself well away from the great mass of them -- the usual manoeuvre).
“I hear the Alta plant’s hirin’,” Huey suggested in an effort to bring more optimism — or, at least, some measure of congeniality — to the discussion.
“I already tried over there. They ain’t hirin’ Portagees and Greeks,” Verde snarled. “They only want Anglos.”
“Well now, I wouldn’t say that,” Huey put in, even though he knew Verde was probably correct. Edward Johnson, the Alta plant manager, was one of Huey’s regular customers and Johnson had often expressed his distrust of what he referred to as “Mediterranean niggers.” - Bruce Robinson, (1922)
"Silver said...
Although the nutters among them are definitely wrong that other human groups are 'hate-worthy' per se."
Oh those are not hate worthy, but "feral afghans and niggers" are? How quite dishonest of you.
Niggers at least don't pretend to be White they have this going on for them, unlike "honorary swarthoids" and the other non-white "caucasoids" who base their claim of "worthiness" on them being "whiter" than niggers.
Honestly, as a European I know sandniggers, medniggers and curryniggers quite well (Spaniards, Maghrebis, Italians, Iraqis, Pakis etc...) and racially they may be "whiter" than the niggers but behaviourally they are just as bad.
Then what purpose do you serve by spouting off inanities like you do? Did you have some issues with NE guys growing up? Did the girls not cozy up to you? You readily admit the NE derived societies are better, yet you blabber on like a fool with a wounded ego.
What inanities are you speaking of? Everything i say is a fact, retard. I wouldn't say i have a real problem with the average NE guy, although i realize i'm different and if real Nordic supremacists ever gained control it would certainly not be good for S. Europeans. I suppose I do act a little petty with my LOLing @ their current situation and suicidal tendencies but it's hard not to when you have delusional Nordic (internet) supremacists who think it's the 19th century still. Plus honestly I don't give a shit if they go away forever.
And yes, Northern Europeans create more industrious societies, if you don't agree then go look at GDP per capita statistics. Do I think it has to do with genetics, yeah I'd say it plays a strong role. S. Europe needs a eugenics program, that's obvious. We don't need to merge with a race like the modern Northern Europeans. I understand the average overemotional S. European cannot even contemplate the practice of eugenics but eugenics would help any nation. At best we could assimilate some of the Northerners into our greater gene pool, not us being assimilated into their greater gene pool. Because as I said, they have no demographic future.
The difference between you and I is that you are desperate to assimilate and merge with Nordics while I am not, you are a coward. Why is it Nordicists want nothing to do with Southern Europe but you want to be with them? They are confident in their race's capabilities without us or anyone else. Are you afraid what will happen if they are gone? If they seperate or if they die off? See you have no concept of racial loyalty or understanding of racial progression. You're just a lazy piece of shit who wants to take the easy way out. And as I said before this would be pretty stupid and short sighted, since their nations have no real demographic future. The higher powers who rule the planet (mostly international Jews) essentially want them gone, annihilated, and they are doing a good job at it. Hell once Western and Northern Europe become so completely over ran with non Europeans I have a feeling they are going to start migrating to the Mediterranean nations, it's already happening a little bit in Spain. Northerns are moving to Spain.
You want to merge with a dying race? Yeah fully assimilate yourself in with them and then watch as their entire civilization crumbles and your grandchildren look like a Philippino. lol
NO doubt about it, in N. America and NorthWestern Europe the whites will be minorities by the time you have grand children. If you really care about YOUR race, you will move back to Southern Europe, breed with an intelligent high stock Southern European female, and help progress Southern Europe.
Because this is all I seem to be hearing from you.
"Please please please Mr. Nordish preservationists can I be part of your society? But what about the dark haired Britons? If they are in can I be too? We are ONE, EUROPE IS ONE! I have no racial pride or racial loyalty of my own, I don't want to work on and help develop my own race or sub race, I just want to merge with the Nordics even though my blood had nothing to do with their achievements."
-Cyd
The trick is to get enough of us to want to go back so that we can form English-speaking enclaves.
What force/s might be harnessed to accomplish such a task? An attractive force would be the governments of our ancestral lands offering their support -- if they "need immigrants" (the greatest crock of shit ever foisted on a population) better to take us than a pack of feral afghans or niggers.
Well I think Italy and Greece have a policy where if you have at least one Italian/Greek grandparent you can immigrate back from the diaspora. Obviously it should be 1 grandparent + other European ancestry.
Southern Europe needs a lot of work done, i mean seriously a ton of work. Many southern Europeans are pretty worthless honestly. The only way is to somehow end the Dysgenic trend that's been going on their for centuries. Yes, Southern Europe is in desperate need of true leaders and visionaries. Also I don't even give a shit about people like Bosnians or Albanians, I just care for the Greeks, Italians, and Spanish/South French.
A repulsive force would be the nordy natives of our adopted homelands getting fed up and throwing us out.
LOL, that's never going to happen. They can't even keep millions of hostile, in your face Mexicans waving La Raza flags out. Much less other assimilated, educated, middle class, (off) white folks like us. They're so incredibly paralyzed and afraid of being called one silly word like 'racist', not to mention 9 out of 10 of them have gobbled up all the rubbish the Jews have stuffed down their throats and don't even think about race.
What do you mean "get the chance"? What's stopping you doing it right now? Funds? Economic opportunities over there?
For the field i'm going into (haven't made it yet, still in my early 20s) there are economic opportunities over there although they pay much less because Europe is so socialistic, but I need to learn the language, and I also am not quite ready for the move, honestly. It will probably be half a decade before I get there. But yes, i'm almost 100 percent positive i'm leaving. The U.S.A has no real future. U.S.A's future = Brazil.
For the field i'm going into (haven't made it yet, still in my early 20s)
I got shoes older than you. Needless to say, though I'll say it still, you have at least 2-3 decades before you begin to understand things as they truly are. Until then, better to keep quiet and less abrasive as others may take you for a fool. Or is it too late for that?
As well, you can't bust onto the scene with no real world experience. No deep understanding of racial issues. No education to speak of. No country to flee to (self admittedly). Then flap your mouth how you want the demise of others for no other reason because they pissed you off. That is about as stupid as you can get. Then lecturing me without knowing anything about me is...well, let's just be polite and call it youthful naivety.
and if real Nordic supremacists ever gained control it would certainly not be good for S. Europeans.
Why wouldn't it be good? Nords create the most prosperous countries and everyone wants to live in them. It would be a net gain for the whole world. You don't want to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs do you?
Never been to Portugual, but I have been to Italy and Spain and the population of both country is certainly not "Nordic-looking" nor "Nordid-looking". Typically it is either Alpinid/Mediterranid or Armenoid (or Dinarid)/Mediterranid or just Mediterranid.
There are SOME "Nordish-influenced" (such as the Asturian exemplar) Spaniards and Italians but they are certainly not to be found in "appreciable numbers" and are usually the result of Interethnic mingling (hence why they are traditionally to be found in the Northernmost parts.) - Rassy
--
Your being a bit dishonest again here, since the north-central parts of Spain and Portugal,at least historically, are/have been of the Atlantid, or Atlantic race -- as well having received signifigant infusions of Nordic (or 'Nordid') Celtic blood (hence their ancient name, "Celt-Iberia(ns)") -- as well of course some Germanic elements from the Vandals and the Visogoths (Spain was known in the fifth-century as the "Gothic Kingdom").
Especially so with Italy, with the northern part of that territory being long known as "Cisalpine Gaul" -- hence a Celtic region -- in addition to the very significant Germanic invasions of the Italian peninsula after the fall of the Roman Empire.
Honestly I can't think of a blonde or Nordish woman that is as obnoxious and disgusting as Joy Behar and Nancy Pelosi, who many people would consider to be Jewish without knowing their ancestry is Italian. ...
Essentially correct (and as an Italian I must say I utterly loathe both of those warpigs) but it can often be a case of style-over-substance with the pee cee and liberal sensitivities of many, many a Nordish gal.
In other words, it seems there are more lefty libs to be found among Nord women and less among 'Med' or south Euro women (although the latter, as you say, can be more vocally obnoxious about it).
Meds are by and large parasites in the USA, lesser evolved Semites amongst higher evolved Nords.
You can think of the Meds as posionous ground-dwelling snakes, and the Nords as, say, a very highly evolved raptor such as owls or hawks -- birds are a higher evolved form of reptile.
Where would you rather live: Sicily or Sweden?
"if real Nordic supremacists ever gained control it would certainly not be good for S. Europeans."
Southern Europeans are allied with international Jewry in the USA, the Med mafia with the Jew mafia, and the Med/Jew domination of the American economy is causing rapid decline as we see all around us.
America was at its peak when it was ruled by Northern Europeans. Once the bloodsucking Meds and Jews (Papists and Kikes) started pouring in to the cities and started taking over key industries it was all downhill from there.
In America the Nords keep sub-urbanizing themselves - pushing further and further away from the Med/Jew city cesspools - to escape the Med/Jew creep in to their neighborhoods.
Why are you such an angry, passive-aggressive little bitch, "Kulaks Never Learn"? Why do you obsequiously suck up to people and then turn around and stab them in the back? And why do you post under dozens of bogus names and identities, "Langobard"?
"And yes, Northern Europeans create more industrious societies, if you don't agree then then go look at GDP per capita statistics."
Yup...and morons still wonder why the USA is in rapid economic decline now that the Meds and Jews are in charge of the American economy.
Med-Jew alliance against Anglo-Saxons:
"...in Canada as in Italy, Italians and Jews got along well together...Italians and Jews worked in the needle industry and garment trades both in Montreal and Toronto and both communities experienced discrimination by Canadian nativists, Anglo-Saxon right wingers and the militant Orange Order...Jewish and Italian women often baby-sat for each other and, thus, some Italian-Canadian children could function in Yiddish...
"A splendid example of their good relations was the Italian participation on the side of the Jews in the Christie Pits Park riot in 1933. Stimulated by Hitler’s anti-semitism in Germany, some right wing Canadian youths created a Swastika Club in Toronto and practised discrimination and sometimes even engaged in violence against Jews. Christie Pits Park at the junction of Bloor and Christie Streets on the city’s west side was the theatre of violent fights between boys of the Swastika Club and Jews in the summer of 1933. Scores of Italian boys went to help their Jewish friends and one of the participants recalled that he was the only Jew in a truckload of Italian boys rushing to Christie Pits."
Angelo Principe, The Darkest Side Of The Fascist Years
Med-Jew alliance against founding-stock Americans:
"Congressman Celler of New York, who voted against the bill, received a letter from Prince Gelasio Caetani, the Italian ambassador, congratulating him on his speech in the House in opposition to the bill, and thanking him especially "for the frank and open position you have taken in upholding the dignity of my race." Imagine the furore if the British ambassador had taken similar action. Lord Sackville West was sent home merely because, in response to a request from a supposed British-born voter, he advised him how to vote."
Edward R. Lewis, America: Nation or Confusion
Meds-Jews are now fossils of history yet still they try to cling to a long-gone past which was admittedly glorious in many respects but has now long since passed them by.
In North America the Meds and Jews should return back to the land and small towns while letting the Nords take over and repair the culture, politics, the economy, and so on. Spengler says that cultures go through phases, yet in the USA an entire stage in Northern Euro history has been hijacked by upstart and often degenerate Meds-Jews.
Aside from a few cities in the PacNW nearly all American cities are controlled by the Med-Jew mafia and the brown-horde wage slaves they brought in to prop up their fake and unsustainable hyperconsumerist economy which is a laughable house of cards teetering on collapse. Meds and Jews have also flooded in to numerous Nordid cities in Canada, Australia/NZ, Scandinavia, etc etc...even places like Buenos Aires used to be mostly Nordic (as you might guess the air isn't too good there anymore though since the brown hordes took it over).
Just look at how shitty the majority of American cities are under the rule of Meds-Jews...since the Meds and Jews are obvious civilizational failures we must let the Nords step in and clean up this terrible mess which the Meds-Jews have made.
Aside from a few cities in the PacNW
yes, go to Seattle or Portland, preach Nordicism there, see what reactions you get
"He or she must be dark in any case, no more towheads (blondes), Let us banish all these will-o'-the-wisps!"
-Sigmund Freud
^_^
Where would you rather live: Sicily or Sweden?
Why don't you tell us from your vast personal experience. Oh, let me guess, you haven't left your shithole and are only making rash generalizations, right?
I've been to both, as well as most of Europe. Just where the fuck have YOU been? You fucking retard.
It's well-known by now that (white) women prefer men of their own race more than (white) men prefer women of their own race.
BUT OF COURSE, the attacks on the white male psyche will continue, because that's who you attack, when you attack a race - the men, not the women. And that's all the comments ever are - attacks by haters and their useful idiots.
I'll admit when I was younger it used to piss me off when I would see a white (as in typical Nordic white woman) with a negroid, but now I just laugh at it. "Not my race" I say to myself, and not a race that has any future.
I don't want to interrupt your fantasy, so I'll be brief: brunettes report screwing more black men than blondes or redheads do (social survey data I read on this site).
You may now continue with your regularly-scheduled fantasy.
Was that percentage or total numbers, because obviously brunettes would be higher as they are the vast majority of Whites. Even among women with blonde hair most are dyed-blonde brunettes.
Part of the perception is that men naturally place a higher value on blondes and redheads and they are more visually striking, so seeing them miscegenate is a greater loss and offense to the senses.
Was that percentage or total numbers
Percentage
seeing them miscegenate is a greater loss and offense to the senses
That's true. Swarthoids probably miscegenate more, but people just don't notice it as strikingly. People feel more disgust and revulsion when they see wayward Northern Europeans miscegenate, so it sticks in their mind and biases their perspective of the actual percentages.
Was that percentage or total numbers,
Percentage...
_____________________________
The percent of white females in this sample who report any black sex partner, by hair color:
Black 8.2%
Brown 5.0%
Blond 3.9%
Red 3.9%
More data on racial mixing
The percent of white females in this sample who report any black sex partner, by hair color:
Though it's unlikely n/a wouldn't have corrected for percentage of those hair colours in the sample, the phrasing is somewhat ambiguous. Perhaps he can confirm that it is in fact percentages of women with those hair colours, and not percentages of total women in the sample. 21% of white women having had a negroid sexual partner seems quite high.
Post a Comment