In reply to an email I received on this topic.
Consider ageIt's true that controlling for age will reduce the gap in educational attainment, but it makes no sense to control for age unless you can give me some reason to believe girls who become pregnant at young ages are as intelligent as those who don't (nevermind more intelligent!). Everything I've read and observed leads me to believe this is not the case. I believe younger mothers tend to be less intelligent and women who reproduce with blacks at any given age are less intelligent than those who reproduce with whites, and the numbers line up with this:
To what extend are bright women opting to have black babies rather that
pursue education?
You're claiming these are "low quality" women.
That is NOT obvious.
For Non-Hispanic White mothers (of white vs. mulatto children) aged 20-24:
Less than HS: 16.7% vs. 21.2%
B.A. or higher: 7.0% vs. 3.2%
For Non-Hispanic White mothers (of white vs. mulatto children) aged 25-29:
Less than HS: 5.7% vs. 11.8%
B.A. or higher: 37% vs. 16.2%
For Non-Hispanic White mothers (of white vs. mulatto children) aged 30-34:
Less than HS: 2.8% vs. 6.8%
B.A. or higher: 54.2% vs. 30.5%
We are seeing is the less bitchy, more compliant women get grabbed byAlong with thousands of other variables, NLSY97 contains information on respondents' sexual partners, including race. What do we find when we compare white females who report black sexual partners to those who don't?
blacks -- basically the women that are susceptable to indoctrination.
The former are fatter (mean BMI: 27.8 vs. 25.4), dumber (median ASVAB math/verbal percentile: 52.2 vs. 61.1), and bitchier. According to self-ratings, they are more quarrelsome:
3.72 vs. 3.84 (where 1 means quarrelsome and 5 means agreeable)
More difficult:
2.38 vs. 2.13 (where 1 means cooperative and 5 means difficult)
More stubborn:
3.22 vs. 2.84 (where 1 means flexible and 5 means stubborn)
Less dependable:
1.73 vs. 1.60 (where 1 means dependable and 5 means undependable)
They're also more likely to report they lie or cheat (lie or cheat only sometimes: 60.3% vs. 45.3%; lie or cheat often: 5.8% vs. 3.0%)
Those with mulatto children are even fatter (mean BMI: 29), dumber (median ASVAB math/verbal percentile: 45.9) and as bitchy or bitchier on the metrics mentioned above.
Looking at data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), which followed a different cohort, results are similar. White females who have ever had a black sexual partner are fatter (mean BMI: 28.8 vs. 26.2) and less intelligent (median ADD HEALTH Picture Vocabulary Test score: 99 vs. 105).
As rated by interviewers, they are less attractive (3.29 vs. 3.63, where 1 = very unattractive and 5 = very attractive) and have less attractive personalities (3.53 vs. 3.77) and worse grooming (3.31 vs. 3.61). Unsurprisingly, they are more likely to test positive for sexually transmitted diseases (4.3% vs. 1.8% for chlamydia; 7.2% vs. 1.0% positive for trichomoniasis).
Incidentally, they also have darker hair on average, refuting the fiction promoted by Jewish pornographers and sexually-frustrated Meds that blondes are particularly apt to mix with blacks. The percent of white females in this sample who report any black sex partner, by hair color:
Black 8.2%
Brown 5.0%
Blond 3.9%
Red 3.9%
16 comments:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
"Those with mulatto children are even fatter (mean BMI: 29), dumber (median ASVAB math/verbal percentile: 45.9) and as bitchy or bitchier on the metrics mentioned above."
Is the site a joke/satire? If it is, it's quite funny. If it isn't.....Well, I'm sure my comments don't need to add to the personal issues of the author.
hi, agnostic.
Agnostic? What, like you have a faith? That would make this site even more disturbing.
Have your failures in life bowed you so low to resort to this? I know it may be humbling to see your own smallness in life.
haha. the sheer faggotry of that denial confirms the ID. what a dishonorable little bitch. but we already knew that.
?
history is biography.
Looks like you're not the only one into statistical measures of bitchery.
n/a,
Interesting post.
For the personality measures, I would be curious to know the standard deviations for each group (and whether the differences are statistically significant). The pattern certainly fits with those whites I've known who had negro sex partners.
The percent of white females in this sample who report any black sex partner, by hair color:
Black 8.2%
Brown 5.0%
Blond 3.9%
Red 3.9%
What is the breakdown by hair colour of women in the sample? Do you mean that 8.2% of black-haired women had negro sex partners, or that 8.2% of the women with negro sex partners had black hair?
Do you mean that 8.2% of black-haired women had negro sex partners, or that 8.2% of the women with negro sex partners had black hair?
Sorry, this wasn't phrased well. What I meant to ask is:
Do you mean that 8.2% of black-haired women had negro sex partners, or that 8.2% of women had negro sex partners and also had black hair.
The former.
Thanks. I wonder whether ethnicity would have much effect on the percentages.
It's no surpise that white women who date black men are white trash. Just walk through a WalMart
Great post. Please, keep up with the good work. Always remember to be rigorous, cause we are subjected to a level of scrutiny that almost nobody else has to endure.
Great. This corroborates what so many of us have detected in our private observations.
Biological problems with mixed-race marriage and adoption:
http://sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.com/2011/10/problems-with-mixed-race-marriages-and.html
What is the percentage of ignorance in the author of the study and those who support it?
Quite low...he's citing facts to support readily observable reality. Those who call this 'ignorant' are in denial.
I've noticed that white women that date black men are fatter, uglier and sluttier than the average. They also take pride in dating a black man (makes sense. They have no pride in their appearance, so might as well take pride in being 'different')
- Abaddon