Blue Anonymous asked about this. The evidence I've seen suggests that in the US, black men average similar or very slightly greater muscle mass than white men.
Multiple-regression analysis in the present study demonstrated no significant differences in the SM/ATFM [skeletal muscle / adipose tissue-free body mass] ratio among Asian, Caucasian, and Hispanic healthy groups. In contrast, African-Americans had a significantly larger SM/ATFM ratio than the other groups, although the difference was very small. According to Equation 4, for example, the mean SM/ATFM ratio is 0.524 for a 30-year-old African-American man weighing 70 kg, while the mean ratio is 0.522 for Asian, Caucasian, and Hispanic men of the same age and body weight.
[Wang et al. Muscularity in adult humans: proportion of adipose tissue-free body mass as skeletal muscle. Am J Hum Biol. 2001 Sep-Oct;13(5):612-9.]
Blacks probably carry a greater proportion of their muscle in their arms and legs (which is unsurprising considering they have relatively longer limbs), but total skeletal muscle mass is similar.
Overall, the matched Black and White men had similar fat, FFM, TBW, and TBK. Thus there were no major absolute differences in body composition between the two ethnic groups beyond that of skeletal mass.
In agreement with our findings, Schutte et al. (1984) found that Black and White males of equivalent height and weight had a similar absolute TBW. Slaughter et al. (1990) also found no significant ethnic differences in TBW adjusted for height among adolescent Black and White boys.
[. . .] Total body potassium is an indirect marker of skeletal muscle mass and results are therefore difficult to interpret. One possible explanation for the varied findings is that Black men may have more appendicular muscle and less trunk muscle than White men. According to this hypothesis, Black and White men would have different amounts of skeletal muscle in specific anatomic regions but similar amounts of total skeletal muscle.
[Gerace et al. Skeletal differences between black and white males and their relevance to body composition estimates. Am J Hum Biol 1994;6:255–62.]
The evidence I've seen also suggests whites tend to have greater strength per unit of muscular cross-section than blacks. (Despite the fact that black males
more frequently report lifting weights.)
8 comments:
I wouldn't dispute this- I've often heard blacks are supposedly more powerfully built from the waist down, while whites are more powerfully built from the waist up. Apparently this extends to the point where blacks are a good deal more vulnerable in terms of external heart and neck injuries.
In the sport of bodybuilding, people of all races have dominated at some era.
The Mr. Olympia title winners are entirely whites and blacks.
When it comes to blood tests for eGFR (testing for kidney damage)a routine correction factor of 1.2 is used to account for the average greater muscle mass of american blacks vs. other groups.
"In the sport of bodybuilding, people of all races have dominated at some era."
This is pathetically untrue
Black women are physically stronger than white men. I am a white man
Blacks have more fast-twitch muscles.
Blacks look more muscular due to skin tone are fast. Whites good at power lifting south asians are strong grip
Post a Comment