Jewish Liberalism: the Allinsmith Study

Polling data is not kind to Moldbug's hilarious explanation for Jewish leftism. In a 1940s survey of eight religious denominations, Congregationalist respondents were least liberal. In Boston, high-SES Jews were more likely to vote for Adlai Stevenson for president in 1952 than low-SES non-Jews -- and low-SES non-Jews voted for Stevenson at twice the rate of high-SES non-Jews.
The degree of commitment of American Jews to liberalism is different from the degree of that commitment among other religious groups. The difference is that the Jewish devotion to liberalism is not correlated with economic or educational status. This was demonstrated almost 20 years ago by Wesley and Beverly Allinsmith.2

Toward the close of World War II, the Allinsmiths asked 8,820 members of eight religious denominations whether they believed that the most important postwar task of the U.S. Government was to provide opportunity for people to get ahead on their own or "to guarantee every person a decent and steady job and standard of living."

Nationally, 47% of the people questioned preferred security to opportunity. As the percentage of manual workers in each denomination increased, the proportion favoring security rose. Status, education and income were inversely related to the choice of security. As one proceeded from Congregationalists to Presbyterians to Episcopalians to Methodists to Lutherans to Baptists and finally to Catholics, the preference for security steadily increased from 26% to 58%.

The Jews were the only exception to this rule. Although they were a very high status group ranking first in occupational level, third in educational level and fourth in economic level, 56% of them preferred security to opportunity. This was almost as high as the Catholic preference for security.

Moreover, within each of the eight religious denominations, the preference for opportunity was greatest among those with most education, highest status and best occupational level. Again, the Jews were the only exception.

The 1944 presidential vote also revealed this marked difference between Jewish and Gentile political behavior. The upper-class and upper-middle-class Christian denominations voted heavily against Roosevelt and in favor of Republican standard-bearer Thomas Dewey. Only 31.4% of the Congregationalists, 39.9% of the Presbyterians and 44.6% of the Episcopalians backed Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The more working-class denominations, however, voted heavily for him, particularly the Catholics who were 72.8% in his favor. In terms of their combined educational, occupational and status rank in the Allinsmith survey-that of second place-the Jews might well have been expected to vote Republican. Actually, they were 92.1% for Roosevelt. This overwhelming support was greater than that of any of the Christian denominations. [. . .]

However, in the 1952 elections, despite the fact that the Republican presidential candidate, Dwight D. Eisenhower, had led the Western coalition to victory over the Nazis, 75% of the Jewish voters supported Adlai E. Stevenson, a man who had played no role of any importance in World War II. There was no difference in the attitude of the candidates toward Jewry or the state of Israel. The issue was clearly one of moderation vs. liberalism. In a situation where American voters as a whole gave decisive support to Eisenhower, three-fourths of the Jews backed his Democratic opponent. Moreover, interviews in depth of Boston voters showed that only 30% of the Gentiles with high socioeconomic status, as against 60% of those with low socioeconomic status, backed Stevenson. Among Boston Jews, 72% of those with high status voted for Stevenson.

Source: Nathaniel Weyl's The Jew in American Politics, pp. 6-8

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

In addition, the South, in 1936, was overwhelmingly supportive of FDR. Strange, considering FDR went on to support a bounty of civil rights initiative's, like desegregating the military.

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/datagraph.php?year=1936&fips=0&f=0&off=0&elect=0

Again, in 1940, the support for FDR in the deep South was overwhelming. Alabama gave FDR 85.2%, Mississippi 95.7% and South Carolina, 95.6% of their vote. Astounding, considering his record of advancing the cause of the African-American.

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/index.html

TGGP said...

There has been a big shift in mainline vs evangelical, but as of 2004 mainline was still slightly Republican leaning.

In "Modern Times" Paul Johnson writes:
"In general, American public opinion strongly backed the [Vietnam] war, which was throughout more popular than the Korean War. According to the pollsters the only hostile category was what they described as 'the Jewish subgroup'".
His source for that is John Mueller, "War, Presidents and Public Opinion" from 1973.

Svigor said...

Lol. Whups.

Don't worry, though; Moldbug will eventually respond with a 10k word avalanche of gobbledygook. And when his followers have finished reading it, they'll declare it "devastating," even though not one of them will be able to accurately summarize it.

Word verification: supepap.

Perfect.