tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post223496780846454749..comments2024-01-27T00:27:45.851+00:00Comments on race/history/evolution notes: Paul Gottfried hates "WASP" peoplen/ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02378473351485233448noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-48446076998122582142009-11-01T17:27:46.188+00:002009-11-01T17:27:46.188+00:00And to think that 'Saul' Gottfried coined ...And to think that 'Saul' Gottfried coined the term 'paleocon' (faileocon), and runs the HL Mencken Club which is currently meeting in Baltimore this weekend.<br /><br />On Holloween, no less.<br /><br />Ah yes, the CONservatives. Is their ANYTHING that they cannot be CONned into these days by their Jewish 'friends'?R U Kidden Me?noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-53248716211574594322009-11-01T06:23:45.881+00:002009-11-01T06:23:45.881+00:00There is a decent discussion at Occidental Dissent...There is a decent discussion at Occidental Dissent on the 'Paul Gottfried Question' here: <br />http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/08/27/gottfried-on-wasps/<br /><br />Who knew his son was a SPEECHWRITER for La-Raza "Supreme Court Justice" Sotomayor?<br />http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/08/27/gottfried-on-wasps/#comment-17702<br /><br />If you read that article, Gottfried basically brags about this. His son is such a "great wordsmith", he says. I think this is strong corroboration for my thesis above that Gottfried's political posturing and discourse is a carry-over from the rabbinical debating spirit: The idea is that winning debates and proving adeptness at argument is the key; not building a better future as such, not working for "voelkisch" interests in and of themselves (a concept that he mostly mocks). In short, Gottfried uses issues as means to win an argument [the goal]; serious people use arguments as a means to get their position on issues to win out in social-discourse [the goal].<br /><br />And then there's this: {{PAUL GOTTFRIED: <i>Once when asked what kind of position I might have taken had I joined the Left, I immediately responded “a Stalinist who would be able to go after the Trotskyists.” Unfortunately that option is no longer available for me or my son.</i>}} Anyone who can make such a flippant statement is not serious about his politics beyond the parlor-game/rabbinical-"Who's-the-better-wordsmith" level.Wandererhttp://img517.imageshack.us/img517/280/growthideologywp7.jpgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-68117423151088534852009-10-31T20:08:52.740+00:002009-10-31T20:08:52.740+00:00Gottfried's politics are simply an elaborate p...Gottfried's politics are simply an elaborate parlor-game. I mean, it seems to me that his endless bloviations about various issues really come down to a sort of rabbinical debating contest, in final analysis. Why does he do it? Because winning debates and proving intellectual superiority is an exhilarating sport. It's a sport that has been played by his ancestors for millennia (skill at argument was always highly valued in Talmudic Judaism).<br /><br />See the first paragraph of this post for a perhaps more eloquent wording: http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/09/26/leonard-zeskind-paul-gottfried-white-nationalism/#comment-19390<br /><br />Or here:<br />http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/08/27/gottfried-on-wasps/#comment-17690<br /><br />Parlor-games notwithstanding, his Jewish animus comes shining through from time to time (as in the OP)--<br /><br />If he truly cared AT ALL for American-nationalism, he would *champion* white-protestant revivalism, rather than what he actually does, which is mock us and hold us up as an enemy to be derided and to be overcome *on quasinationalist grounds*. He's done that in his columns, usually somewhat subtly. It's actually shocking how insidious his line of reasoning is: "The main problem with the USA is its founding stock." [I recall years ago reading an odious piece he'd penned, called something along the lines of "America’s National Problem: Protestantism", in which he argued that semi-explicitly].<br /><br />And they say this Gottfried is "not one of 'those' Jews"! <br /><br />When the mask of his "paleoconservative" bloviations comes off, he doesn't seem so dissimilar to those of the Neoconservatives after all, nor to the typical Jewish agitators of any self-proclaimed poltical ideology.<br /><br />In the search for Good Jews and White Whales, we'll have to skip over this one; he's too insidious to be the former and too physically-small to be the latter.Wandererhttp://img517.imageshack.us/img517/280/growthideologywp7.jpgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-87536977897128039122009-09-01T05:31:04.630+01:002009-09-01T05:31:04.630+01:00Does anyone really think "Saul" Gottfrie...Does anyone really think "Saul" Gottfried is really on our side?<br /><br />'Good golly Miss Molly', have even the 'Fail-eo-cons' been 'CON'nd' like the 'mainstream' CONsevatives and the RepubliCONS???<br /><br />No, it is more of a sad case of chronic insecurity and pitfully low self-esteem among the Dispossessed American Majority, the "DAMned", if you will, who feel they need a Jewish "spokesman" to speak for them, no matter how inane and incredibly stupid such a move is.<br /><br />==<br />"While it is a commonplace for White Europeans and Americans to critically talk in private about Arabs, Mexicans, Africans or, for that matter, deride their fellow White citizens, a critical comment about the influence of Jews, even if founded on empirical facts, is viewed as an insult to Jews. ...<br /> <br />"Such a schizophrenic climate of self-censorship in the West will sooner or later lead to dramatic consequences for both Jews and non-Jews. The lack of healthy dialogue can last for decades, but feigned conviviality between opposing groups cannot last forever. Mendacity carries the germ of civil war. <br /> <br />***<br /><br />"In the same vein, many intelligent White American and European racialists frequently decorate themselves with their “token Jews” in hopes of achieving some legitimacy in the mainstream media and seeking some camouflage in their opposition to non-European immigration or to various other myths of multicultural ideology."<br /> <br />"Who is an anti-Semite?"<br /> ~Tom Sunic<br /> <br />http://tinyurl.com/r7luql<br /><br />& <br /> <br />"As Sunic points out, in both Europe and America, White attitudes towards Jews have come to be defined in modern times by mendacity and intellectual servility. Faced with a political, academic, and media establishment —the current masters of discourse — configured around a colossal concentration of Jewish power, Whites have not only trained themselves to avoid Jewish wrath by keeping any critical opinions about Jews to themselves, but they have also learnt to curry Jewish favor by flaunting their admiration for Jewish superiority and achievement, by piously demonstrating their conformity to Semitically-correct cognitive structures, and by loudly championing Jewish causes — even when these run directly counter to White interests. Sunic correctly suggests that, in as much as this fuels Jewish hubris, such an unhealthy relationship approaches a limit where it exists one crisis away from detonating into violent anti-Semitism."<br /><br />“I am Not Racist, but…”<br /> ~Alex Kurtagic <br /><br />http://tinyurl.com/lkpogoNordmannoreply@blogger.com