tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post282579797818169221..comments2024-01-27T00:27:45.851+00:00Comments on race/history/evolution notes: Rightists fatter than leftists?n/ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02378473351485233448noreply@blogger.comBlogger95125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-49830894952667023982015-08-14T00:09:11.156+01:002015-08-14T00:09:11.156+01:00“This American Life” Shitlibs Get Their Testostero...“This American Life” Shitlibs Get Their Testosterone Levels Tested<br /><br />August 11, 2015 by CH<br /><br />…and the results cause the men to burst into tears.<br /><br />Via his poasting career, one of the funniest stories I’ve read this year.<br /><br /><br /><br />It turns out that the gay Jew has the highest testosterone level at 274. The other four men are clustered around half of that (144)<br /><br />144. Male shitlibs are LITERALLY low T manlets.<br /><br />http://mpcdot.com/forums/topic/8368-shitlib-facespng/page__st__180#entry215500<br /><br />https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2015/08/11/this-american-life-shitlibs-get-their-testosterone-levels-tested/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-23963088148962136232015-08-11T21:16:08.451+01:002015-08-11T21:16:08.451+01:00Thanks!! Thanks!! Santocultonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-36600638425329230902015-08-11T19:29:33.543+01:002015-08-11T19:29:33.543+01:00Maybe, digit ratios need to be analysed together w...Maybe, digit ratios need to be analysed together with brain hemispheric dominance, hand and body side domination to we had more perfect correlation results.Santocultonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-49352809054473107032015-08-11T18:49:29.081+01:002015-08-11T18:49:29.081+01:00Santoculto--yes, and I alluded to it at the very b...Santoculto--yes, and I alluded to it at the very beginning when I realized you weren't talking about my all-caps. Apologies, and of course it doesn't matter about the English, there's this SVErshov that is very smart, but has a hard time in his (probably) Russian English. <br /><br />Your recent remarks very good, I agree with most of it, but this isn't an area of major interest to me (for those very reasons of stupidity about intelligence of one kind only), and god knows, the blog is too fucked--same 'provincial-internet' tricks one sees so often. Best--HW<br /><br />"I'm against sterilization of real nice people of all ''iq ranges''."<br /><br />Yes.<br /><br />Problem gets worse when Highest IQers and hardcore HBDers get a veritable gift with some total black racist like our current 'Messiah', because he tends to prove everything they say is right. Although the smarter of the elites are surely just waiting for this to pass. Talk of 'white genocide', therefore, does seem to make sense when you have someone talking about 'people pretending to be white' and 'being indifferent to 9/11' because all those policemen and firemen (including the blacks) were more or less just waiting to 'shatter his body'. Hideous freak, and a scandal people of any colour are prostrating themselves at his feet. White people are not 'people pretending to be white', they are white people, even if a half-white like Obama is called 'African-American'. That phrase originated with Baldwin, though, so this son of a Black Panther is going to be able to get away with it for awhile. Harlem Whiteboynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-60311113476114815712015-08-11T14:11:26.150+01:002015-08-11T14:11:26.150+01:00Same way people like cats. In ancient Egypt cats w...Same way people like cats. In ancient Egypt cats were treated as special creatures. As well when white tourists visit China. Santocultonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-12892713015798389682015-08-11T14:06:56.228+01:002015-08-11T14:06:56.228+01:00Hbders hardcore give enormous enphasis in '...Hbders hardcore give enormous enphasis in ''intelligence'' based on ''capacity to earn money'' or ''capacity to make a perfect sat''. But are these people who are pushing biological genocidal agenda against white people. The smarts ''with'' higher iqs, on average. Practical creativity or complex survivability and wisdom are completely dispised by hbd'ers, as well smart kindness, courage and others positive personality traits. <br /><br />If you eugenize american white people, is likely that they will become overwhelming a leftist and monarchists, it is good??? <br /><br />Snobs and pseudo-humanitarians...<br /><br />I'm against sterilization of real nice people of all ''iq ranges''.<br /><br />Hbd'ers defend consciously or not a ''eugenics of market''. <br /><br />All selective tests to entry in faculty, regular jobs or iq tests are idealization of intelligence, how should be and not how it is.<br /><br />To say ''iq test don't measure intelligence'', is wrong. Iq measure specially convergent thinking style and not whole concept of intelligence. Hbd finish their curiosity about intelligence here.<br /><br />Scholastic ability tend to correlate with certain personality types like the teacher and academic scientist prototype. Santocultonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-49718081116080771232015-08-11T13:32:11.527+01:002015-08-11T13:32:11.527+01:00I'm not immigrant or mexican, mein aenglische ...I'm not immigrant or mexican, mein aenglische ist bund, bad, everyone in hbdsphere know about it. I enphasise ideas than grammar. Santocultonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-44335014043915053512015-08-11T06:13:04.541+01:002015-08-11T06:13:04.541+01:00IX. Digit Ratios
After sanitizing the digit ratio...IX. Digit Ratios<br /><br />After sanitizing the digit ratio numbers, the following correlations came up:<br /><br />Digit ratio R hand was correlated with masculinity at a level of -0.180 p < 0.01<br />Digit ratio L hand was correlated with masculinity at a level of -0.181 p < 0.01<br />Digit ratio R hand was slightly correlated with femininity at a level of +0.116 p < 0.05<br /><br />Holy #@!$ the feminism thing ACTUALLY HELD UP. There is a 0.144 correlation between right-handed digit ratio and feminism, p < 0.01. And an 0.112 correlation between left-handed digit ratio and feminism, p < 0.05.<br /><br />The only other political position that correlates with digit ratio is immigration. There is a 0.138 correlation between left-handed digit ratio and believe in open borders p < 0.01, and an 0.111 correlation between right-handed digit ratio and belief in open borders, p < 0.05.<br /><br />No digit correlation with abortion, taxes, minimum wage, social justice, human biodiversity, basic income, or great stagnation.<br /><br />Okay, need to rule out that this is all confounded by gender. I ran a few analyses on men and women separately.<br /><br />On men alone, the connection to masculinity holds up. Restricting sample size to men, left-handed digit ratio corresponds to masculinity with at -0.157, p < 0.01. Left handed at -0.134, p < 0.05. Right-handed correlates with femininity at 0.120, p < 0.05. The feminism correlation holds up. Restricting sample size to men, right-handed digit ratio correlates with feminism at a level of 0.149, p < 0.01. Left handed just barely fails to correlate. Both right and left correlate with immigration at 0.135, p < 0.05.<br /><br />On women alone, the Bem masculinity correlation is the highest correlation we're going to get in this entire study. Right hand is -0.433, p < 0.01. Left hand is -0.299, p < 0.05. Femininity trends toward significance but doesn't get there. The feminism correlation trends toward significance but doesn't get there. In general there was too small a sample size of women to pick up anything but the most whopping effects.<br />http://lesswrong.com/lw/lhg/2014_survey_results/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-33244520331207599282015-08-11T03:28:50.657+01:002015-08-11T03:28:50.657+01:00Mugabe,
'the right-left dichotomy is itself a...Mugabe,<br /><br />'the right-left dichotomy is itself a "frame" like nature-nurture, not a description of reality. the reality is infinite dimensional so far as it is not artificially constructed by mass media...'<br /><br />All models are "frames" and not pure descriptions of reality. As non-omniscient beings, we must settle for models of reality in trying to understand the world beyond our immediate senses. The only question is whether or not a given model is in fact useful. I agree that mainstream "right" vs. "left" political theater as played out in the mass media today is not all that meaningful, but there are underlying traits that correlate with where people fall on this spectrum.<br /><br />'while none have been to shown to have a statistically significant and reproducible and environment indepedent effect on any human behavioral trait, including intelligence'<br /><br />I'm pretty sure several hits for intelligence have reproduced now. No one claims that heritability for traits like intelligence means the effects of genes are "environment independent". But environmental interventions currently within our power, beyond the basic nutrition and education already universally available in the developed world, seem to have little impact.n/ahttp://racehist.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-35726908434436320062015-08-11T01:52:01.150+01:002015-08-11T01:52:01.150+01:00hereditism is itself an example of a universalism....hereditism is itself an example of a universalism.<br /><br /><i>blut und boden</i> includes <i>boden</i>.<br /><br />but HBDers deny this. for them it's just blut, blut, blut all the time.<br /><br />the suppression of the <i>boden</i> is universalism par excellence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-3904879497704869672015-08-11T01:43:28.024+01:002015-08-11T01:43:28.024+01:00the only constant is change. cut your losses. put ...the only constant is change. cut your losses. put your energy into making a good life for yourself and your dependents if you have any. <br /><br />good doesn't win in the end, but there's still technical progress and however dumb men become this will continue. nietzsche's superman will come and he will come even with open borders and dysgenics.<br /><br />economics is itself still a pre-industrial revolution discourse.<br /><br /><i>The ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed, the world is ruled by little else. Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually slaves of some defunct economist.</i><br /><br />religion has been replaced by ideology. but even this will be overcome. man creates himself through labor---technical (technological) progress. and eventually he overcomes himself.<br /><br />that hundreds of single alleles have been shown to <i>cause</i> mental retardation while none have been to shown to have a statistically significant and reproducible and environment indepedent effect on <i>any</i> human behavioral trait, including intelligence, is quite telling.<br /><br />behavior genetics is a dead end for particularists, and i would identify myself as one. whereas a belief in the often awesome effects of "norms of reaction" <i>requires</i> a particularist politics.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-83413016465148709032015-08-11T01:31:35.997+01:002015-08-11T01:31:35.997+01:00yes particularism is much better than universalism...yes particularism is much better than universalism, and "states' rights" isn't just code for negrophobia.<br /><br />universalism has been promoted by jews <i>for</i> gentiles, though jewish americans now outbreed more often than not.<br /><br />but "conservatives" love free trade...<br /><br />globalization and global sovereignty of capital = universalism. they're the same thing.<br /><br />the right-left dichotomy is itself a "frame" like nature-nurture, not a description of reality. the reality is infinite dimensional so far as it is not artificially constructed by mass media...which, as John Macquarrie inter alia observed, has an effect beyond the wildest dreams of totalitarian dictators.<br /><br />you (or <i>one</i> for the precious fakers) can't have the dominion of capital and closed borders and particularism simultaneously.<br /><br /><i>Suddenly the fingers of a human hand appeared and wrote on the plaster of the wall, near the lampstand in the royal palace. The king watched the hand as it wrote. 6 His face turned pale and he was so frightened that his legs became weak and his knees were knocking. 7 The king summoned the enchanters, astrologers[b] and diviners.</i><br /><br />paleocons, like me to an extent, and cons and neocons don't really have anything "extra-nominal" in common.<br /><br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-82964600538902423582015-08-10T20:22:19.349+01:002015-08-10T20:22:19.349+01:00Anonymous,
Thanks.
Mugabe,
I've never clai...Anonymous,<br /><br />Thanks.<br /><br /><br />Mugabe,<br /><br />I've never claimed to be "a pure colonial". My ancestry is half colonial American and half continental Germanic.<br /><br />You're not understanding where I'm coming from at all.<br /><br />(1) I don't hate poor people and I don't think I've ever said anything that would make a coherent person think I hate poor people.<br /><br />(2) I don't hate "everyone who isn't an english congregationalist." I defend the descendants of New England Puritans: (a) because they're "my people"; (b) because I happen to know a bit about them, I sometimes feel compelled to respond when I see people being wrong on the internet, and too many people in this corner of the internet really seem to enjoy passing along misinformation about Yankees/Puritans.<br /><br />(3) To the extent I've defended the old American upper class, the point is not that they were perfect. The point is, they were better in many ways (and even at their worst, no worse) than the elites we have now. Number one, at least they were American (and the other main point I've made, re: the "WASP" epithet as applied to old American elites, is that people misunderstand the nature or degree of their exclusivity, imagining that the old upper class represented some sort of distinct caste with origins in the deep past, wholly unconnected to "regular" Americans; when in reality the American upper class was always simply a segment of the broader American majority, never closed to social mobility from the core NW European-descended population). Hierarchy will exist in any large scale society. I would take elites with a sense of history and multi-generational responsibility from my own group over a hodge-podge of ethnocentric foreigners and deracinated members of my group focused only on their short term self-interest.<br /><br />(4) I don't even hate most leftists of my own group. In a different environment, white Americans with leftist tendencies would not necessarily be promoting the same destructive policies they currently are (the same of course goes for establishment conservatives).<br /><br />re: Scandinavia, regardless of where the political spectrum is shifted relative to America on the question of government redistribution, there will be people more or less inclined to the right. And obviously right now it's primarily those on the right arguing against immigration.<br /><br />As for myself, I have no desire to emigrate anywhere. I would like to see Scandinavians preserved in Scandinavia, and Americans of mixed NW European ancestry preserved in America. This is my country, and, good or bad, these are my people. If we're doomed, so be it. But I see no grounds for dispensing with hope entirely at this point. There's nothing inevitable about the future our current elites have in mind for us, and I don't see that our interests are likely to be served by despair right now (or ever). n/ahttp://racehist.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-20764530010021254602015-08-10T18:30:33.640+01:002015-08-10T18:30:33.640+01:00and it's no surprise that retarded cavemen lik...and it's no surprise that retarded cavemen like n/a would hate poor people if he were rich just like he hates everyone who isn't an english congregationalist.<br /><br />what's odd about n/a is he's not rich, yet he hates poor people.<br /><br />what's even odder is that he claims to be a pure colonial yet his ancestors never accumulated enough to be rich in at least 2015 - 1776 = 239 years.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-60688296627330327842015-08-10T18:22:06.231+01:002015-08-10T18:22:06.231+01:00and everyone favors some redistribution.
the diff...and everyone favors <i>some</i> redistribution.<br /><br />the difference is one of degree not kind.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-13450915168287652402015-08-10T18:19:16.877+01:002015-08-10T18:19:16.877+01:001Department of Political Science & Government,...1Department of Political Science & Government, Aarhus University<br />2Center for Evolutionary Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara<br />3School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University<br /><br />1retard<br />2retard<br />3retard<br /><br />muscleheads at all levels in the us are "conservative" when race is controlled for. but there are hardly any muscleheads at the high end.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-63839302387916822592015-08-10T13:18:01.897+01:002015-08-10T13:18:01.897+01:00The finding that leftist males are disproportionat...<br /><i>The finding that leftist males are disproportionately likely to be very skinny or very fat is in line with my own impressions. Unattractive and sex atypical people (effeminate males, masculine females) are drawn more strongly to leftism. Sex typical, conventionally attractive people are more likely to be conservative. Larger (non-obese) and more masculine males are more comfortable with undisguised assertion of self- and group interest (probably because weighted across evolutionary time they're the ones, at the top of status hierarchies, who could get away with it).</i><br /><br /><br />http://pss.sagepub.com/content/24/7/1098.short<br /><br />http://evp.sagepub.com/content/13/1/147470491501300109.abstractAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-47941133073238480222015-08-09T14:51:09.600+01:002015-08-09T14:51:09.600+01:00Harlem Whiteboy,
you're crazy**
i'm talki...Harlem Whiteboy,<br />you're crazy**<br /><br />i'm talking about Buggabe.Santocultonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-8976581932015330122015-08-09T10:03:26.141+01:002015-08-09T10:03:26.141+01:00thatcher even went so far as to say, "there i...thatcher even went so far as to say, "there is no such thing as society."<br /><br />what she meant by this is the opposite of the truth.<br /><br />social capital isn't just an idea.<br /><br />whatever one's talents he may have no opportunities or may simply not fit with his particular society. i know better than any. <br /><br />hereditism is therefore Ideologie, that is, the justification of the status quo, in that it assumes the phenotype is the same irrespective of time and place and that whatever it takes to gain status is a virtue and independent of the particular time and place and society. this problem can be obviated by studies of related people/peoples across the globe and across time. but h^2 can only decrease and very likely to 0. the jarre project is a great example, and it ruined the formerly richest man in america.<br /><br />i'm sure n/a believes that however high his station it would have been even higher in the time of the "episcopacy". and <i>he's probably right.</i> but the milk has been spilt. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-72265526245405425212015-08-09T09:51:02.928+01:002015-08-09T09:51:02.928+01:00i'm all for discrete homogeneous societies, bu...i'm all for discrete homogeneous societies, but not because i believe in the superiority of one race to another. yet another FACT is that heterogeneity leads to conservative economic policies and that norms of reaction predict that on average one is most likely to achieve his potential in a society composed of people most like himself...given the same level of economic development.<br /><br />but the brits and the mercastanis squander the potential of their citizens of all races. the canadians and antipodeans much much less. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-34900893911085439492015-08-09T09:45:58.782+01:002015-08-09T09:45:58.782+01:00i'd never call anyone white trash if actually ...i'd never call anyone white trash if actually thought they were. i hate classism more than i hate jews. n/a should try to immigrate to scandinavia. america isn't worthy of him. the war's over and the wogs have won. maybe he can't get in. maybe he has illiquid assets in mercastan.<br /><br />he's apparently some sort of anglo-saxon supremacist. but that's the wrong team. the angles, saxons, jutes, frisians, normans, and whoever the Danes of the Danelaw were came from jutland and environs.<br /><br />contempary jutland has:<br /><br />1. the highest taxes as a % of gdp of any country in the world---50%.<br /><br />2. the highest % of its workforce employed by government.<br /><br />3. a much higher standard of living than white british.<br /><br />4. the lowest GINI.<br /><br />5. the smallest intergenerational income elasticity. the us and uk have the highest in the developed world.<br /><br />6. according to 60 minutes the danes are the happiest people on earth.<br /> <br /><br />the white british are the POOREST germanic language speaking population in Europe. they are now much poorer than the IRISH.<br /><br />conservative, randian, libertarian ANGLO-SAXON economics simply does NOT work, let alone that it's evil.<br /><br />i'm sure n/a will come around some day. scandinavia has its "leftists" <i>who are also anti-immigrant.</i> as bernie sanders has rightly observed...open borders is a CONSERVATIVE policy.<br /><br />and i'm sure i'm a much bigger loser than nick land or n/a. but hereditism is quite widespread, pernicious, and FALSE especially in mercastan and britain. it's an example of what marx called ideologie and/or false consciousness.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-29807049428787065072015-08-09T03:29:42.427+01:002015-08-09T03:29:42.427+01:00"ALL music is prole and adolescent even it..."ALL music is prole and adolescent even it's von karajan's studio recordings of wagner or monk's tio album...IT'S DEPSICABLE. ALL ENTERTAINMENT, BUT ESPECIALLY MUSIC IS DESPICABLE."<br /><br />I couldn't leave without pointing out that at least this idiocy is not something Charles and Julia 'would understand', unlike Rex. Not that you 'mean it', of course. You don't 'mean anything'. But it doesn't matter whether Charles and Julia even would agree with such gross trash about music, it doesn't matter that Heidegger's essays on art weren't about music. <br /><br />But you seem comfortably ensconced and n/a is oddly patient with your shit. I still wonder why, because there is nothing quite like a 'wannabe snob'. Someone at Nick's said that 'Whiny tough guys are the worst', maybe you're one of those too, they're often related. <br /><br />Livin' on the net, that's all we know about you. Even Nick Land said "If I'm not a 'loser on the internet', then the term has no meaning". But we do know something about him, even if we don't like all of it. He's not exactly a nobody.Harlem Whiteboynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-48099771176474816612015-08-09T02:43:28.261+01:002015-08-09T02:43:28.261+01:00but you're just as loquacious as n/a.
You see...but you're just as loquacious as n/a.<br /><br />You see, you're really rather a ruin, since it's you who is most loquacious. I'm just abundant. <br /><br />Now I'm listening to The Doors album 'When You're Strange'. Wonderful opener of 'Moonlight Drive'.<br /><br />I've read Sein und Zeit, and it is unfortunate Zeit was not written or maybe it wasn't found. My Heidegger period is not something I ever revive, though.<br /><br />I'm curious as to what someone so livid with all kinds of hate values, aside from Evelyn Waugh, of course. But no one knows, because IT REALLY IS JUST THE NET. You do behave like a drunkard, which is surely heard as less complimentary than 'alcoholic'. But then again, you may just be a very tight-assed parvenu.Harlem Whiteboynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-85129878606216415772015-08-09T02:35:38.305+01:002015-08-09T02:35:38.305+01:00Well, I did say 'ta', which was quite load...Well, I did say 'ta', which was quite loaded, but <br /><br />'there are so many things we understand charles and he (rex mottram) doesn't.'<br /><br />So you're from the Flyte Family, is it? You know, Mummy so rarely did things like that.<br /><br />On the net, these 'judgments' don't matter, if someone is ultimately low-class, which you clearly have proved to be, even if it's not white-trash low-class. It just doesn't 'matt-ah', you know. <br /><br />Yes, I like verisimilitude in my sexual adventures. I blog about them all the time, although that's not all, of course. I only did porno film once.<br /><br />'undah-stahnd things, yes... EVEN Misseez Mus-braht'. There's your Nigerian, I guess.<br /><br />Well, I couldn't be SURE you weren't interesting, now could I? Now I know. As I said:<br /><br />Ta.Harlem Whiteboynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-227780861638767023.post-32013300962045518822015-08-09T02:22:17.452+01:002015-08-09T02:22:17.452+01:00no fucktarded hillbilly.
i was joking.
you'r...no fucktarded hillbilly.<br /><br />i was joking.<br /><br />you're serious.<br /><br />but you're just as loquacious as n/a.<br /><br />it's called bathos.<br /><br />look it up.<br /><br />in general your lect should indicate your judgement of your interlocutor, not the judegment you wish him to have of you.<br /><br /><i>there are so many things we understand charles and he (rex mottram) doesn't.</i><br /><br />anyway i'd like to find one intelligent hbder. are there any? n/a's crossed off.<br /><br />and at the bottom i see you're "listening to" something?<br /><br />is that music?<br /><br />ALL music is prole and adolescent even it's von karajan's studio recordings of wagner or monk's tio album...IT'S DEPSICABLE. ALL ENTERTAINMENT, BUT ESPECIALLY MUSIC IS DESPICABLE.<br /><br />SHAKESPEARE AND ESPECIALLY NIETZSCHE WERE RABBLE. AND SCIENTIFIC RACISM IS JUST ONE MORE REBEL YELL. BUT IN N/A'S CASE IT'S COMING FROM NEW ENGLAND. THAT'S LIKE A POPE COMING FROM SAUDI ARABIA.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com