| Political Cohort |
Sex |
No Racial Pref |
White |
Asian |
Black |
Hisp |
| NP |
F |
37.7% |
47.5% |
6.6% |
0.0% |
4.9% |
| VL |
F |
47.2% |
36.5% |
3.4% |
3.9% |
3.4% |
| L |
F |
38.7% |
46.2% |
2.0% |
2.0% |
3.5% |
| LB |
F |
35.1% |
55.4% |
2.7% |
1.4% |
1.4% |
| M |
F |
32.5% |
55.0% |
2.5% |
2.5% |
2.5% |
| C |
F |
20.4% |
68.6% |
3.7% |
1.5% |
2.2% |
| VC |
F |
14.6% |
75.0% |
0.0% |
2.1% |
2.1% |
| NP |
M |
40.7% |
35.7% |
15.7% |
1.4% |
2.9% |
| VL |
M |
32.1% |
35.8% |
15.5% |
1.6% |
3.4% |
| L |
M |
37.8% |
39.9% |
12.7% |
2.1% |
4.5% |
| LB |
M |
29.2% |
46.7% |
12.2% |
2.8% |
4.4% |
| M |
M |
31.7% |
49.5% |
11.5% |
1.4% |
3.7% |
| C |
M |
20.5% |
59.9% |
10.0% |
0.5% |
6.2% |
| VC |
M |
17.0% |
70.0% |
6.7% |
0.9% |
4.0% |
The
Races Whites are Most Attracted To
(NP=Nonpolitical,VL=Very Liberal, L=Liberal, LB=Libertarian,M=Moderate,
C=Conservative, VC=Very Conservative) (F=Female, M=Male)
Races Whites are Most Attracted To
(NP=Nonpolitical,VL=Very Liberal, L=Liberal, LB=Libertarian,M=Moderate,
C=Conservative, VC=Very Conservative) (F=Female, M=Male)
Another observation: "In general, the more liberal a white male is, the more likely they will indicate they are physically attracted to Asians."
From a different article on the same page:
In 2005, we had speculated that the testosterone-estrogen ratios of Liberal males and females were closer to each other than the Conservative males and females, who were more skewed towards either the testosterone or estrogen sides of the scale, respectively. This proposal is looking more reasonable today. [. . .](Note: I don't believe "low-testosterone males" contributed disproportionately to science and technology. The opposite seems more likely to be true.)
Our current evidence indicates that white Liberal males are less likely to pass on their genes than are the white Conservative males, as the Conservatives report higher rates of both pair-bonding and heterosexual sex. Further, this tendency is exacerbated among Caucasians, as the white females, on average, are more likely to mate with Conservative males than with Liberal males.
However, all is not lost for the Liberal males. Liberal females heavily apply political and religious cues in mate selection, and have a strong preference for Liberal males, and seem to be more averse to prominent androgen features in mate selection. The rise of the low-testosterone male, so instrumental in the development of science, technology, and the arts, has been highly reliant on a subpopulation of females keeping them in the mating game.
485 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 401 – 485 of 485Catholicism is Satanism
Meridionalism is Negroism
Rassenhygieniker, what is this nonsense of you picture spamming Meds mixed with Native Americans and calling them Meds?
I don't picture spam Barack Obama or Colin Powell and try to say they they are Nords because they are half biologically Northern European.
A med mixed with a native American is not a med, it is a med/NA mixture. Just like a North Europoid mixed with a Negroid is not a Nord, it is a mixture or mulatto.
Show pictures of Italian or Spanish Argentinians, not mixtures.
Vikingism said...
It all comes down to this: where would you rather live in Europe, which places are better - Medish Europe or Nordish Europe? Sweden or Sicily? Switzerland or Spain?
I think we all know the answer.
Well, it depends on just what part of "Nordish" Europe your talking about there, 'Sven'.
Germany or Holland, sure, but I don't know about this country -
Britain 'one of the worst places in Europe to grow up' - Telegraph
A comparison of health, education and housing standards in 29 states across the continent puts the UK in 24th place – far below smaller and poorer countries such as Slovakia and Hungary.
The study, carried out by the Child Poverty Action Group ahead of the Budget, also claims young people in Britain are less happy than elsewhere.
...
The new study compares the 27 nations of the European Union, plus Norway and Iceland, in seven categories of health, wellbeing, material resources, education, relationships, behaviour and housing.
Britain finished in the bottom third of the table in four of the areas, and in the middle in the other three.
The UK scored badly in health, coming 24th, because of poor immunisation levels for childhood diseases, and came 21st in terms of subjective wellbeing because its children are more likely to say they are in poor health than others.
It came 24th in terms of material wellbeing because so many children live below the breadline and in homes where neither parent works.
Britain finished 22nd in education because of the high number of young people who drop out of school and fail to get jobs.
...
The European child wellbeing table was topped by the Netherlands. The only countries rated worse than Britain were Romania, Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania and Malta.
It all comes down to this: where would you rather live in Europe, which places are better - Medish Europe or Nordish Europe? Sweden or Sicily? Switzerland or Spain?
Also, why do so many Brits (who presumably are 'Nordish') want to come - in droves - down to a 'Medish' country like Spain?
"Find a second home in Spain - quickly" - Telegraph
In summer, every second of every day a British person boards a plane to Spain. We love the place. We can't get enough of it. It's our number one destination for foreign property, accounting for 30 per cent of the overseas holiday home market.
...
The industry estimates that there are 750,000 homes in Spain owned by British nationals, roughly 500,000 in France, and many more in places such as Florida, Portugal, Mediterranean countries other than Spain, and, increasingly, eastern Europe. So at least 1.5 million British households - roughly 6 per cent of the total - have given up sufficiently on their "normal" lives to want to half-live somewhere else. And that is just those who can afford it.
Yes, indeed the Northern Europoids who founded N. America pushed back the Natives, which obviously helped them create a superior civilization to a mongrelized/multicultural one.
The Spaniards didn't do that much miseginating, it's just that they never ended up killing the natives like the Nords did to the North American Indian, so their race/blood never became predominate. - Sir Infamous
Good grief, let's also have some balance and proportion here regarding the peoples, and their numbers, that the Northern Europeans encountered verses the Southern Europeans.
Don't forget that of the "Native American" population in the Western Hemisphere when the Europeans arrived, nearly 9/10ths of them were found in Central/South America, not in North America.
SO of course there was to become a greater mixed-race society in 'Latin' America compared to 'Anglo' America.
*Don't forget as well the Carrbean countries founded by the British and the Dutch, such as Jamaica, Bermuda and Aruba, were very racially-mixed, and did not always even practice hypodescent, so many of their 'White' population were indeed (light) mulattoes.
All of the energy that is spent by racialist bloggers arguing over (whatever) is energy that is not being spent on finding a woman, fucking her, and raising kids.
I know a few guys out there who are racialists and do have families. Guess what - they don't spend countless hours online rehashing the same topics over and over.
Seriously.
Guys like Rassie and miggles should use their time spent advocating for 'Nordishism' more productively, say boycotting a pizzaria.
That will get the message out.
Silver said...
(continuing...)
...
I tried to calm him down. "I'm too old for starting fights," I said. "If someone starts you, you have to fight back. But don't go starting trouble. You've got the right idea to stick to our group. But these days our problem isn't the aussies; it's all these other fuckers from Africa and stuff. They're not like us. When you get down to it we've got the same problems as the aussies, especially back in our home countries."
That made him think for a second. "Yeah, you're right," he said. He put his arm around me. "You're all right, man. You're all right."
(The End)
...
This fellow very easily could have distanced himself on a racial basis, but opted not to. Or rather he didn't "opt not to," he opted (positively) for an identity in which the racial aspect was only one of a cluster of traits-in-common that facilitate a sense of common purpose, and this in turn enabled him to see in me (or "read into me") a human whole in which my (heavily) "medish" traits are not some "barrier" to overcome but an outward indication that more "good stuff" lies within, ie outward indications that increase the likelihood that any attempt at interaction will be rewarded, which is to say: result in an increased degree of fellow-feeling because of that interaction.
---
Cyd said...
"However I think it's absurd you think a Greek Islander or Apulian or something should feel kinship with an Icelander or Norwegian before an Armenian or Turk." (@Sir Infamous)
From my perspective, they are part of the "club". The European club that has entry criteria which is both genetic and geographic. That is why I have a kinship with all Europeans. Doesn't mean I love them all, but I do have a kinship.
===
Good points.
Reminds me of one of the most trenchant quotes from Wilmot Robertson's The Dispossessed Majority:
Racism, it should also be mentioned, operates in different orbits in different locations. Consider two American soldiers, one of Scandinavian, the other of South Italian origin, guarding a lonely outpost facing the North Koreans or the North Vietnamese. At home the first might have called the second a Latin or an Italian when he was trying to be polite, a "Wop" or a "Greaser" when he wasn't. Now he feels himself in the presence of a fellow White.
http://www.solargeneral.com/library/dm.pdf
The modern USA is a parasite nation which can only survive by endlessly importing the 'fresh blood' of non Whites. The vampire only survives if it has fresh blood to suck, new cattle, and the USA lets in millions of non Whites to feed on their economic growth and most importantly their life force. The last statement may sound absurd, but the corrupt Western elites are 'energy vampires' of sorts.
Little do they realize that once Whites die the vampire nation will die too, the USA becoming just another bastard backwater combination of Brazil and India: Brazindia.
Anon said "Also, why do so many Brits (who presumably are 'Nordish') want to come - in droves - down to a 'Medish' country like Spain?"
Because many Brits are partially descended from ancient Meds and Paleolithic people with roots in Iberia. They're just yearning to return home.
"Britain 'one of the worst places in Europe to grow up' - Telegraph"
Of course modern Britain is a shithole. It's been flooded by endless millions of 2nd and 3rd worlders in the last few decades by the corrupt elites there. London and other large British cities look like zoos not because of native Brits but because of the immigrant hordes.
Anon said "Also, why do so many Brits (who presumably are 'Nordish') want to come - in droves - down to a 'Medish' country like Spain?"
Because many Brits are partially descended from ancient Meds and Paleolithic people with roots in Iberia. ...
Miggles weeps...
They're just yearning to return home.
LOL.
...Nordish countries are the most technologically advanced countries on the planet. And the tectonic weaponry won't have to be that sophisticated and developed considering Southern Europe's vulnerable geographical position on a major fault line.
Still threatening genocide, hmm?
How stupid, especially in today's day and age, when even an internet nerd impotently blowing hot air (like yourself) can get prosecuted in so many countries and international juristictions for even talking like this.
Geesh, I don't know if this is funnier, or the claim that Southern Euros 'pretend' to be White/European, to live (never mind the fact that most of 'em been there for several generations - with little-to-no migration now) in 'Nordish' countries and, of course, get 'access' to 'Nordish' women.
Think how stupid this is for a moment:
South Euro 'Medish' male: "Will you go out with me"?
'Nordish' gal: "No, your not White."
'Medish' guy: "Ah, but actually, 'officially' I am European."
Nordish gal: "Well, I suppose that makes everything just A-OK and fine and dandy then! Let's go on a date'."
Geesh.
Oh, and regarding those 'tectonic' weapons - Ya hear that 'Tony' and 'Dmitri' - open up another pizza or gyro joint anywhere in the "People's Republic of Northern Europe" and we'll turn your 'native countries' into parking lots!
Pathetic...
People like rassie are a tremendous liability to their own cause.
Sadly, they're also a liability to anyone else who shares the same basic outlook on multiracialism and multicult (the "mass" versions of them, anyway) without necessarily harboring ill will (especially endless, ontological ill will) towards anyone -- because the assumption on the part of opponents is that, aware of the problems extremism creates, we're just "covering up" what we really think.
That said, rassie's an absolute godsend from my pov. There are few more effective ways of keeping "fringe whites" who could fit into whiteness from racially organizing around it. That means all that remains is to divert the racial anticipation that has been built up in them (for whatever reason, eg stormfront) into a more rewarding channel.
Doing so, however, requires getting them to once again see clearly, since so many have been duped into evaluating themselves by nordic criteria -- eg Chechar. That can be difficult because, having internalized those criteria, the perceptions they generate seem quite real to people, whereas in reality they are simply the result of one way of viewing the world among other, more or less as equally valid, alternatives. In my view, since it possible to do it, people are best off adopting criteria that casts their racial existence in the best light. In this sense, as judged from an internalized set of medish criteria -- and I haven't mentioned this before since I'd rather not kick a man when he's down -- the average nordic male is perceived as dorky and the average female as plain. That's obviously a more effective mental mode than one that requires you to believe you exist among gods that you're lucky to merely breath the same air as.
"Kulaks Never Learn" aka "Langobard" aka dozens of other phony names is having a meltdown now that his abuse of Vanishing American has been exposed.
People like rassie are a tremendous liability to their own cause.
-- and I haven't mentioned this before since I'd rather not kick a man when he's down -- the average nordic male is perceived as dorky and the average female as plain. That's obviously a more effective mental mode than one that requires you to believe you exist among gods that you're lucky to merely breath the same air as. - Silver
Rassie is a Chav, plain and simple -
Don't feed the Chavs
ANd regarding dorks, well, we all know on this thread who fits that term to the "T" (hi miggy!)
People like rassie are a tremendous liability to their own cause.
Maybe not unintentional. Hasn't it been exposed his native language isn't English?
Maybe not unintentional. Hasn't it been exposed his native language isn't English?
Trying to have an intellectual conversation with Rassie about race and biology, or anything else, is about as coherent (and makes as much sense) when British 'Ali G' has an 'interview'
with Noam Chomsky.
-- and I haven't mentioned this before since I'd rather not kick a man when he's down -- the average nordic male is perceived as dorky and the average female as plain. That's obviously a more effective mental mode than one that requires you to believe you exist among gods that you're lucky to merely breath the same air as. - Silver
An average person is going to be plain by definition, idiot.
Yet swarthy losers like you have such pathetic lives that they spend their time on Nordish forums around "dorky, plain" Nords and live in Nordish countries rather than their own.
Your people are perceived as nigger hybrids and are just another foreign race that needs to be expelled.
"Anonymous said...
Think how stupid this is for a moment:
South Euro 'Medish' male: "Will you go out with me"?
'Nordish' gal: "No, your not White."
'Medish' guy: "Ah, but actually, 'officially' I am European."
Nordish gal: "Well, I suppose that makes everything just A-OK and fine and dandy then! Let's go on a date'.""
This is the technique traditionally used by the medish volk present in Nordish territories, specifically used by kikes/armenoids at first which was later on adopted by swarthoids.
Kikes and swarthoids are the ones behind the notion alteration of Nordish/Germanic = White to European/Caucasoid = White.
Obviously that was fueled by their agenda, because be they kikes or swarthoids neither really view themselves as being "White" no matter how much they may pretend that is the case in public as to facilitate the achievements of their own interests.
As I said before, they know they are inferior so they want to make themselves superior (or at least less inferior) and become the "New Whites" in the process, by intermixing with Nords as to upgrade their race and make themselves less inferior while getting rid of the Pure Caucasoids (Nordish Volkes) in the same process.
One example of a wog wanting to be tall like the Aryan-Overmen:
"Caudium said...
I guess we have to breed more often with Northern European women, whenever we can, so as to make us taller."
http://s1.zetaboards.com/anthroscape/topic/3947582/5/
As I said before, they know they are inferior so they want to make themselves superior (or at least less inferior) and become the "New Whites" in the process, by intermixing with Nords as to upgrade their race and make themselves less inferior while getting rid of the Pure Caucasoids (Nordish Volkes) in the same process.
As we have seen, one could use the same conjecturing and mythical (self)-defining definitions of "Nordishness".
In other words: "Non or less Nordic pan-Northern Europeanists want to destroy, or at least appreciably distort, the traditional definition of Nordic to dispel their inferiority by lowering the standards of 'Nordicness' to their levels and hence make themselves the "New Nordics".
Your people are perceived as nigger hybrids and are just another foreign race that needs to be expelled.
You know, its rather interesting how often the term 'nigger' is used by certain people here - since the only people, in real life, who use the term so much are actual Negroes themselves.
What is the big deal with this anyway? You can't hear two black dudes talk to each other for more than 1 minute without hearing the word nigger 20 times. In the Epic Beard Man episode, the black guy was calling Epic Beard Man a nigger through his broken lips on the bus. A couple years back in a Y basketball league I was in, a black dude got ejected, by a black ref, and it was nothing but nigger this and nigger that for the next ten minutes till the big oaf finally left the building.
The lnk that Rass provides of 'evidence' of anti-swarthoidness shows a picture of a rather swarthy Victoria Beckem prominantly featured, lol.
http://s1.zetaboards.com/anthroscape/single/?p=560534&t=3947582
*I know, Rass, I know, she is from 'Atlantid' - hence 'Overman' stock (double lol).
The term "Nordic" is used as a synonym for "Northern" to mean "Northern European".
A Nordic person is a native of Northern Europe.
The UK is in Northern Europe:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/74/Europe_subregion_map_UN_geoschme.svg
In other words: "Non or less Nordic pan-Northern Europeanists want to destroy, or at least appreciably distort, the traditional definition of Nordic to dispel their inferiority by lowering the standards of 'Nordicness' to their levels and hence make themselves the "New Nordics".
If you had a god damned brain cell that was working you'd know how stupid and nonsensical that is. We use the real definition of Nordic and other sub-racial classifications. Nordish is an umbrella term just like White and Mediterranean.
Here's some advice from one of your own.
The term "Nordic" is used as a synonym for "Northern" to mean "Northern European".
A Nordic person is a native of Northern Europe.
Ah, dear buddy Rassie, we've been through this before, and I (and nearly all others) will just respectfully disagree here with your selectively-skewered definitions.
Remember - Lapps and Sami are also the genetic natives of 'Northern Europe', but no one thinks of them as Nordic (perhaps culturally one can make that claim).
Also remember as well that Great Britain is not officially even considered part of 'Nordic Europe' - but of Atlantic Europe.
Don't worry Rass, you still can consider yourself a good fella...
The UK is in Northern Europe: - Rass
The UK is more a part of Atlantic Europe:
Atlantic Europe is a geographical and anthropological term for the western portion of Europe which borders the Atlantic Ocean. The term may refer to the idea of Atlantic Europe as a cultural unit and/or as an biogeographical region.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biogeography
It comprises the western (Atlantic) part of Iberia (Spain and Portugal), north and western France, Ireland and the United Kingdom. ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Europe
You know, its rather interesting how often the term 'nigger' is used by certain people here
It's appropriate considering how many swarthoids and sandniggers we have here. Why they're here, when they're not welcome and this blog doesn't pertain to them is the "interesting" part.
The term nigger was often used in America in reference to sub-Saharan Africans as well as swarthy Southern Europeans and non-Europeans.
Since the 60s with the counter-cultural, anti-White revolution the term has fallen out of favor and most Whites are terrified to speak it in public, many even in private. Some are so psychologically damaged and self-loathing such as SWPLs that they condemn other Whites for any violation as well. I say grow a fuckin' pair.
Revilo Oliver, one of our greatest minds, used the term in his writings.
Since the 60s with the counter-cultural, anti-White revolution the term has fallen out of favor and most Whites are terrified to speak it in public, many even in private. Some are so psychologically damaged and self-loathing such as SWPLs that they condemn other Whites for any violation as well. I say grow a fuckin' pair.
No one here is offended by the term, just find it amusing that it is used with the frequency that Negroes often use it.
Frankly, its overuse is a little old-hat, and, more importantly, is not going to appeal in waking up most White folks to their dispossession. They are just going to associate its (especially prolific) use on the part of a White (or Nordish) Advocate with that of a hick or a Klan member.
It certainly wouldn't attract, especially anywhere near meaningful numbers, the type of Northern Europeans a movement would absolutely need to begin to seriously reverse their dispossession.
The UK is more a part of Atlantic Europe
You swarthoids curse Britain then you try to appropriate Britain. Make up your minds, scumbags.
The term "Nordic" is used as a synonym for "Northern" to mean "Northern European".
A Nordic person is a native of Northern Europe.
Professional anthropologist and *Nordicist* Dr. Hans Günther may beg to disagree with this assertion -
The British Isles seem to be nowhere so fair as north-west Germany, nowhere so dark as the south of France. The fairness of the population diminishes on the whole in the direction north-east to south-west. The whole area in England south of the Liverpool-Manchester line, and west of 2° W. -- that is roughly, of a line from Manchester to Bournemouth -- is relatively dark. Within this area only Wiltshire and east Somerset are somewhat fairer; Cornwall and the southern half of Wales are darkest. The counties of Northampton, Huntingdon, Bedford, Buckingham, and Hertford, lying in the middle of England, are dark.
http://www.white-history.com/earlson/hfk/reoechap6.htm
And Dr. Günther specifically states that these areas in Britain are bio-genetically Mediterranean, not 'Cro-Magnid' or 'Upper-Paleolithic' (though these gene frequencies may reside elsewhere).
*Sorry, but I'll take Herr Günther's - and other professional anthropologists like Carleton Coon - on the issue of th proper and accurate sub-racial classification and definitions.
Frankly, its overuse is a little old-hat, and, more importantly, is not going to appeal in waking up most White folks to their dispossession. They are just going to associate its (especially prolific) use on the part of a White (or Nordish) Advocate with that of a hick or a Klan member.
The only thing old-hat here is the whining nonsense coming from swarthoid concern trolls. You're like a bunch of kvetching, old Jewish crones. Piss off.
"The UK is more a part of Atlantic Europe"
You swarthoids curse Britain then you try to appropriate Britain. Make up your minds, scumbags.
"Your tenacious like bull. I like"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Lzz8KER520&feature=related
You swarthoids curse Britain then you try to appropriate Britain. Make up your minds, scumbags.
No one here is necessarily 'cursing', or trying to 'appropriate' Britain.
We are just discussing some of the unfortunate things that have been occuring in that country over the last several decades -- the same way we discuss the unfortunate things that have been occuring in the United States, or any other European countries.
Seriously, it s 'cursing' Britain by factually stating that it is more of a genetic part of Atlantic Europe rather than Nordic Europe?
Haplogroup R1b (Y-DNA) says it all
People forget that Nords are not fully 'White.' They are mixed, one part descend from ancient hunting-gathering-fishing stock of Europe (Paleolithics, Cro-Magnons, etc) though in recent times they are mostly mixed with recent Neolithic (Near Eastern) immigrants who were farmers and ranchers (and civilization builders), though the Neolithic is now mostly predominant in most White populations. There is also a Neanderthal element there too in many Nords and other Europeans. Hence why many Nords have roughish and even a bit curly hair (instead of perfectly smooth and straight), hairy bodies, men are bearded, etc.
That article that was on here recently about the various ethnic groups within the White race called Nords 'bleached Mediterraneans.'
The people on Earth who have perfectly straight hair on their head (no kink or curl in their hair whatsoever), very little body hair, large and prominent noses with a high bridge (opposite of a Sub-Saharan African nose), feed on the life force and energy of other people (they are also telepathic), etc...those are the real ruling elite throughout history that have dominated all others, built all advanced civilizations and most technologies, and who have sought to mix with Whites because they are the best, strongest, and smartest 'apes' on Earth compared to Asiatics and Africans. And those 'people' I just described are actually reptilian-human alien hybrids (didn't you see that movie 'Signs' with Mel Gibson?) with origins in ancient Sumeria/Mesopotamia where they started all advanced civilization and have moved outward around the world from there. Read David Icke's book THE BIGGEST SECRET though take the more sensational portions with a grain of salt: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biggestsecret/biggestsecretbook/biggestsecret.htm - some say these people had origins on Mars but turned that planet in to a desert and had to move to Earth for resources. And they have turned huge portions of Earth in to a nearly unlivable desert thus far too - the Middle East and near East used to be their base of operations, where it all started for them, but now most of it is a desert albeit they left a glorious civilizational past behind.
Too bad those aliens have now overshot civilizationally and now the Earth and mass-civilization in general faces very dire crises - a convergence of catastrophes - if things aren't soon brought back under control, especially ecologically.
The decline of the Roman Empire and other civilizations throughout history weren't so bad since it only involved millions, but now that the Earth has almost 7 billion and counting the stakes are much-much higher here in the 21st Century and a decline/collapse of civilization likely entails the death of millions (if not billions) if things aren't brought under control soon.
The British are the 'Black Swans' of the White race since there has been so much admixture there on those isles throughout history.
In various discussions about White racialism the British can be classified many different ways. They are White mutts pure and simple unless you get in to many of the elite classes, most of whom kept their blood relatively pure.
"the average nordic male is perceived as dorky and the average female as plain."
Better dorky and plain than nation-wrecking, desert-making parasites who have to soil their own nest importing millions of non-White slaves that end up massively out-breeding them over time and eventually wiping out all culture in the process and surrendering vast swathes of White territories to hordes of racially mixed former slaves.
Sweden or Sicily, Germany or Greece, Norway or Spain, Denmark or Morocco...take your pick on where you'd rather live.
"... the numerically predominant racial element in the British population is Nordic." - Carleton Coon
I'd like to see an updated map with genetics. Southern Europe would look more like a part of North Africa and the Middle East.
"... the numerically predominant racial element in the British population is Nordic." - Carleton Coon
That was a map by Madison Grant you posted.
Sweden or Sicily, Germany or Greece, Norway or Spain, Denmark or Morocco...take your pick on where you'd rather live.
No one is disputing that Northern Europe, on average, is significantly better than most of Southern Europe, just that it is unfair to conflate all of the countries of Northern Europe together as if they were an undifferentiated whole.
As for the ways of life and standards of living, not all of the Mediterranean is bad -- not by far.
Why else would so many people from North Europe, especially Britain, want to come down to live there?
An average person is going to be plain by definition, idiot.
Yes, but we're talking about ethno(racial)centric perceptions here, what people perceive, what their brains communicate back to them about the outstanding qualities of an object or a set of objects. Obviously the average, say, asian, is going to be "plain by definition" but the adjective "plain" is unlikely to be communicated back to a non-asian ethnocentric individual as asians' most outstanding feature; much more likely it will be an adjectival phrase like "they all look the same."
Yet swarthy losers like you have such pathetic lives that they spend their time on Nordish forums around "dorky, plain" Nords and live in Nordish countries rather than their own.
There's nothing pathetic about taking race seriously and encouraging a shift towards racial arrangements more conducive to human happiness (through 'racial living'). That requires getting to the bottom of what really goes on in people's minds, and is surely a better use of one's time than heaping abuse on people for things which they're largely blameless for while laboring under the misconception that you're making a difference.
Your people are perceived as nigger hybrids...
I don't doubt it.
Better dorky and plain than nation-wrecking, desert-making parasites who have to soil their own nest importing millions of non-White slaves that end up massively out-breeding them over time and eventually wiping out all culture in the process and surrendering vast swathes of White territories to hordes of racially mixed former slaves.
You have a choice, feller. You can spend the rest of your days being a bitter dipshit or you can attempt to get your head around the actual facts of reality (as opposed to your fantasy version).
The vast majority of people, the "average person," never had anything to do with the importation of slaves. Just as the average (founding stock) American never had anything to do with the importation of southern and eastern european immigrants and just as the average American (of any provenance) has nothing to do with the tacit green light given to illegal immigration.
It's one thing to refuse to be cowed into ignoring hidden racial angles, but it's quite another to insist on reading them into everything, or to insist that the racial angle is always the most pertinent.
Maybe not unintentional. Hasn't it been exposed his native language isn't English?
Well, he's given us gems like "pletoria" and "profitate." Make of that what you will.
You can spend the rest of your days being a bitter dipshit or you can attempt to get your head around the actual facts of reality (as opposed to your fantasy version).
Ironic coming from Silver.
"Anonymous said...
Why else would so many people from North Europe, especially Britain, want to come down to live there?"
It is a buisness of tourism to pretend that "down south is better", because obviously swarthoid countries live off tourism from the Nordish nations. Most of the UK people who moved to France, Italy or Spain, came back a year or two after they thought they left for good, because the way swarthoids countries are being painted is not the same as reality.
In the same way, Japanese people save money to come to visit France only to get dislusioned by the dilapidated roads, filled with dog shit and littered trash.
"Anonymous said...
Seriously, it s 'cursing' Britain by factually stating that it is more of a genetic part of Atlantic Europe rather than Nordic Europe?"
Countries from Northern Europe:
Denmark, Faroe Islands, Estonia, Finland, Åland Islands, Iceland,
Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom, Isle of Man.
The UK is in Northern Europe, R1b is also high in India, are the Indians Europeans too?
"Most scientists apply Occam's Razor when speculating about the origin of R1b haplotypes found among persons of British descent. They say that, since the original population of Britain was most likely R1b, then a person of British descent with that haplotype is descended from that population.
Only one locale in the top twenty European areas falls in Iberia, and that is Northern Portugal, which has a history of Germanic settlement by Suevi and Visigoths - in addition to a native Celtic past. Of the top ten non-European samples, six are European-American (mostly in Southern or Western states), one is South African European (most likely of British or Dutch descent), and one is Greenland Inuit (although this, too, most likely reflects Danish admixture).
Only one non-European sample was Hispanic.
Iberian, Italian, Eastern European and Scandinavian locales do show up as well, but at much lower frequencies.
This haplotype could have come to Britain from multiple sources, but probably came most often with the Danes and the Anglo-Saxons."
The people from the UK are cromagnoid (Brünn, Borreby, Paleo-Atlantid etc.), Nordoid (Nordid, Keltic-Nordid etc.) and between both Nordoid/Cromagnoid (Anglo-saxon type, Atlantid, Aran type etc.)
R1b is cromagnoid (Paleolithic), Cromagnoid is not rare amongst the Nordish population.
More info here:
http://www.white-history.com/refuting_rm/racial_reality.html#celts
None of this matters in the USA because Whites in America are nothing more than zombie/robotic automatons controlled telepathically by the reptilian race which rules over this planet. Sounds absurd, but read on.
Aliens control various beings on this planet - especially the White race in the USA - via some kind of mind control manipulation, or dream infiltration, or other methods. The existence of Whites in the modern USA - especially White suburbanites - is an almost robotic, zombie-like existence, they are just automatons going about their daily routines under the complete control and sway of unseen alien forces. There is nothing there - they are just zombies, no independent thought whatsoever.
Notice how many people don't drink water in the USA, especially Whites? They say they don't drink water it's because Jesus supposedly commanded his followers not to drink water in the New Testament in verses John 4:7-14 (so in order to be a 'good Christian' you don't drink any water), but it's actually because if they do it'll interrupt their Matrix like existence, wake them up, and snap them in to the real world instead of the controlled puppet-robot world...taking the blue pill...sipping a bit of water every day allows them to break on through to the other side as it were instead of remaining a trapped zombie in the cube. But if you do drink the water don't drink public tap water because it's heavily contaminated - best stick to bottled water.
Countries from Northern Europe:
Denmark, Faroe Islands, Estonia, Finland, Åland Islands, Iceland,
Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom, Isle of Man. - Rass
Rassie, what is your source for this? If you are using the Wikipedia entry which goes by the United Nations definitions, you left out this part:
Nordic countries or Nordic region include only a subset of the mentioned countries and territories.
Your conflating Northern Europe, which is geographical, with Nordic Europe, which is socio-biological.
Here is the traditional definition of the five countries (and three autonomous regions) that make up the Nordic region of nations:
The Nordic countries make up a region in Northern Europe and the North Atlantic which consists of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden and their associated territories which include the Faroe Islands, Greenland, Svalbard and Åland. Scandinavia is sometimes used as a synonym for the Nordic countries,[1] although within the Nordic countries the terms are considered distinct.
The region's five nation-states and three autonomous regions share much common history as well as common traits in their respective societies, such as political systems and the Nordic model. Politically, Nordic countries do not form a separate entity, but they co-operate in the Nordic Council. The Nordic countries have a combined population of approximately 25 million spread over a land area of 3.5 million km² (Greenland accounts for around 60% of the total area).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_countries
The UK is in Northern Europe, R1b is also high in India, are the Indians Europeans too? - Rass
You maybe missing the point. R1b, which is the dominant haplogroup of Europe, of course it will be present in India due to some genetic overlap between the two peoples (hence Indo-European).
"Most scientists apply Occam's Razor when speculating about the origin of R1b haplotypes found among persons of British descent. They say that, since the original population of Britain was most likely R1b, then a person of British descent with that haplotype is descended from that population. ...
Yes, this part makes sense.
However...
...This haplotype could have come to Britain from multiple sources, but probably came most often with the Danes and the Anglo-Saxons."
This part partially doesn't make sense, since if R1b is, like even you say Cromagnid (therefore Paleolithic) -
R1b is cromagnoid (Paleolithic), Cromagnoid is not rare amongst the Nordish population.
it is contradicting since the Danes and Germanic Anglo-Saxons had a appreciably higher frequency of Neolithic and Nordic (or as you say, Nordid) genetic ancestry and therefore were the ones that introduced the post-Paleolithic, Aryo-Germanic genes into the genetic mix that was to become Britain.
So it makes the most sense since R1b is found, as well as you pointed out, in much higher frequencies of the bio-regions of what constitutes Atlantic Europe -- the highest in the western parts of the UK, with somewhat lesser frequencies found in France, northern Spain, Italy and Portugal -- rather than the bio-regions of the nations that make up Teutonic and Nordic Europe.
None of this matters in the USA because Whites in America are nothing more than zombie/robotic automatons controlled telepathically by the reptilian race which rules over this planet. Sounds absurd, but read on.
Sounds interesting and all -- but just who is the 'reptilian race' that you, or your buddy Mr. Icke, is speaking of?
It is a buisness of tourism to pretend that "down south is better", because obviously swarthoid countries live off tourism from the Nordish nations. Most of the UK people who moved to France, Italy or Spain, came back a year or two after they thought they left for good, because the way swarthoids countries are being painted is not the same as reality.
Really, 'most' come back after a 'year or two'??
That must be news to the millions of Brits that permanently leave the UK for, usually, a Southern European nation (or as you so eloquently call them, 'swarthoid' countries).
Reflecting Light: Britain leads the world in race replacement
The Telegraph of London reports that one in 10 Brits lives outside the country, and they're jacking the United Kingdom at a clip of 200,000 a year. They're bailing out to places all around the world (see The Telegraph's map) — 10,000 British choose to spend part of their lives in Bulgaria.
BBC Five radio yesterday broadcast an interview with expats phoning in from the Canary Islands, Spain, Poland, and somewhere else in Eastern Europe I can't remember. Others said they were planning on moving to Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. Why did they leave the U.K. or expect to, the presenter wanted to know. Predictably, most mentioned Britain's lousy weather, high taxes, the lack of decent affordable housing and other such practical reasons, but one or two brave souls — brave perhaps because they were beyond the reach of the U.K.'s "hate crimes" laws — acknowledged that they were sick of political correctness.
In the same way, Japanese people save money to come to visit France only to get dislusioned by the dilapidated roads, filled with dog shit and littered trash.
France is hardly what one would define as a 'dilapidated' country.
"In the same way, Japanese people save money to come to visit France only to get dislusioned by the dilapidated roads, filled with dog shit and littered trash."
France is hardly what one would define as a 'dilapidated' country.
*Sorry I did not space Rassie's comment above from the British newspaper article I quoted from.
but one or two brave souls — brave perhaps because they were beyond the reach of the U.K.'s "hate crimes" laws — acknowledged that they were sick of political correctness.
PC is out of control in Britain, no one disputes this. They won't even say husband and wife now, it's his or her "partner." It's ridiculous.
No reason to sadistically revel in the race replacement of a European country, because it's a problem for all White countries and it's a loss for us all in the long run.
Yes, but we're talking about ethno(racial)centric perceptions here, what people perceive
Not necessarily, most of what you describe is propaganda and anti-White (anti-Nordish) hatred. The vast majority of such nonsense never existed prior to the 20th century. Now we have all of these false memes of dumb blondes, dorky and plain Whites as you call them, and "cool" ethnics with a heavy dose of negrophilia. It's disgusting and absurd. The system is corrupt and has turned our traditions and values upside down.
"http://www.white-history.com/refuting_rm/racial_reality.html#celts"
Some of the information there is out of date. What remains more true than ever is that there's no evidence for a special genetic link between "dark" Brits and Iberians.
The current evidence suggests R1b entered Western Europe relative recently from the east, most likely entering Britain (and Iberia) via present-day Germany and France.
Anonymous said...
"The UK is more a part of Atlantic Europe"
'You swarthoids curse Britain then you try to appropriate Britain. Make up your minds, scumbags.'
"Your tenacious like bull. I like"
You're clueless like nigger.
Ironic coming from Silver.
What facts am I ignoring? What fantasies am I subscribing to? Come on, in your heart of hearts, do I have more to learn from you or you from me?
In what sense am I bitter? FFS, I don't even mind or complain about what you'd have to admit is some fairly intense racial hatred, or that seeing this project through is going to require substantial upheaval.
Not necessarily, most of what you describe is propaganda and anti-White (anti-Nordish) hatred.
Well it's become that, yes. But it was able to become that because because of perceptions enabled by ethnocentrism. Ethnocentrism is contextual, and it was in no small part triggered by a reaction to nordic racial hatred. Once triggered, however, it takes on a life of its own, so that its origin hardly matters.
The vast majority of such nonsense never existed prior to the 20th century. Now we have all of these false memes of dumb blondes, dorky and plain Whites as you call them, and "cool" ethnics with a heavy dose of negrophilia. It's disgusting and absurd. The system is corrupt and has turned our traditions and values upside down.
That's one way to see it. Another is as its purveyors (many of them nordic) see it, which is: do the least harm. Blacks can't help what they are so why must they be punished for it? If helping whites see them in their best light means taking the mickey out of whites, whites are assumed to be able to take it. I'm not asking you to agree with this perspective, only to appreciate that's the reason (not "pure evil!") it's done. (That's domestically. Internationally, in terms of development goals, the reasoning differs substantially.) Of course, the blind spot is that, as I said, ethnocentrism takes on a life of its own. So what you have now are veritable armies of maleducated, malcontent, hairtrigger niggers who can see no reason to apologize for their hatred of whites or their desire to tear down white civilization.
"Anonymous said...
Maybe not unintentional. Hasn't it been exposed his native language isn't English?"
"Silver said...
Well, he's given us gems like "pletoria" and "profitate." Make of that what you will."
dayum I gotz exposed how did you find you? Okay okay my first language is not english its fulfulde but wikipedia says
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fula_language
fula belongs to the atlantic branch so it still makes me an overmen in YO FACE NIGGAZ!!!
and I am blond and sheet, dis beez me in da picture
http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/9976/r160r160.jpg
yall swarthiz are juss jealous cauz i beez blonder than all of yall bitchez IN YO FACE IN YO FACE!
In what sense am I bitter?
Really?? You really need to ask that? You should take all of that misspent energy attempting to analyze others and look inward. Getting satisfaction from seeing people mass murdered because you were picked on when you were younger is way beyond bitter.
It's clear that your blog comments are really a cry for help. I hope you get the help you need.
Prince William is the anti-Christ.
Dragon Monkey: you have it backwards. The 'people' who drink water are the bad guys, the people who do not are the good guys.
The water drinkers are the exploitative reptilians while the non water drinkers are the good guys, possibly the Arcturian alien race or early Reptilians, the Annunaki who have built many advanced civilizations.
dayum I gotz exposed how did you find you? Okay okay my first language is not english its fulfulde but wikipedia says
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fula_language
fula belongs to the atlantic branch so it still makes me an overmen in YO FACE NIGGAZ!!!
and I am blond and sheet, dis beez me in da picture
http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/9976/r160r160.jpg
yall swarthiz are juss jealous cauz i beez blonder than all of yall bitchez IN YO FACE IN YO FACE!
Well, at least Rassie has a sense of humour ;)
The water drinkers are the exploitative reptilians while the non water drinkers are the good guys, possibly the Arcturian alien race or early Reptilians, the Annunaki who have built many advanced civilizations.
Well this sure clears things up.
*Please, there are plenty of conspiracy and ufo sites that your time would be better spent at.
DON'T DRINK WATER. If you do, only sip it.
Drinking too much water is making people 'see red' as it were, and making the masses go crazy all over the world.
The time now is for cooling off and rational reflection, yet drinking alot of water is making people go nuts with rage and speed. Turning them in to murderous zombies of sorts like in that movie 28 Days Later.
"The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity."
- Yeats: "The Second Coming"
Fascinating article from The Spearhead which reviews an article written by a prominent Israeli academic regarding the differences the way Feminism is expressed with different ethnicities (particularly the psychological insights gleaned from his observations between Northern European verses Jews):
Israeli White Knight Bemoans Sorry State of Feminism in Israel - W.F. Price
In egalitarian Scandinavia, for example, no political candidate has a chance of being elected without committing to feminism. It’s the same as the need to be a Zionist to win an election in Israel. We remain quite far from such a situation regarding feminism. Who is really a feminist here?
Yes, and “egalitarian” Scandinavia now has quotas for women on corporate bords, almost passed a “man tax,” prosecutes johns but not hookers, transfers as much wealth as possible into the hands of women and regularly vilifies men in general, despite Scandinavian men being amongst the most compliant and indulgent toward women on Earth.
I don’t know what Levy really wants from women, but he goes so far as to let loose with this unfortunate statement that would make any man in a real feminist country cringe:
"Women should stand up, as should men, and behave like feminists."
...
So what’s the difference? Well, one thing I can think of is that the Mediterranean and Levant have been civilized for millennia, as have East and South Asia. It seems to me that old civilizations that have survived the test of time have some resistance to feminism and female supremacism written into their cultural DNA. This is probably the case because those that did not have this resistance were invariably conquered and displaced by those that did. The history of the Middle East is one of constant demographic displacement and usurpation, and because it has historically been a land of plenty with a relatively mild climate, it wasn’t the environment or the lack of food that applied the most pressure, but rather other groups of human beings. Therefore, it was those with the strongest culture, religion and society that prevailed.
In places such as Scandinavia, there was certainly human conflict, but more pressing was the matter of filling the storehouse before winter came. Scandinavians have an amazing work ethic, which is obvious when one sees their feats of physical endurance in sailing and rowing ships across the Atlantic, skiing across the mountains in winter, working in stony soil from morning till night, etc. But when it comes to defending their philosophy and culture they are fairly subdued. Words are considered superfluous — a man is supposed to be stoic and get to work to overcome the challenges of the physical world. Admirable, to be sure, but totally insufficient in a complex, pluralistic society.
Ultimately, the macho culture of established civilizations will take hold in the North as well, because feminist rule will destroy the egalitarianism that made the silent beta provider ethic work in the first place. Feminist rule requires a police state, and a police state ruled by women soon becomes a police state ruled by police — it never fails.
...
In the meanwhile, contra Gideon Levy, I would argue that Northern European and Anglo men should learn a lesson from the southern cultures typified by the macho, voluble Mediterranean men, and dispense with the stoic, long-suffering traits that have slowly led us toward a status approaching slavery.
Again fellas, not that we have to agree with everything Mr. Price says, especially the last part about 'macho volubility' regarding 'swarthoids' -- but what he says overall is interesting nonetheless on the cultural evolution of sub-racial behavior, particularly with respect to their relations with women.
Fascinating article from The Spearhead which reviews an article written by a prominent Israeli academic regarding the differences the way Feminism is expressed with different ethnicities (particularly the psychological insights gleaned from his observations between Northern European verses Jews):
Israeli White Knight Bemoans Sorry State of Feminism in Israel - W.F. Price
In egalitarian Scandinavia, for example, no political candidate has a chance of being elected without committing to feminism. It’s the same as the need to be a Zionist to win an election in Israel. We remain quite far from such a situation regarding feminism. Who is really a feminist here?
Yes, and “egalitarian” Scandinavia now has quotas for women on corporate bords, almost passed a “man tax,” prosecutes johns but not hookers, transfers as much wealth as possible into the hands of women and regularly vilifies men in general, despite Scandinavian men being amongst the most compliant and indulgent toward women on Earth.
I don’t know what Levy really wants from women, but he goes so far as to let loose with this unfortunate statement that would make any man in a real feminist country cringe:
"Women should stand up, as should men, and behave like feminists."
...
So what’s the difference? Well, one thing I can think of is that the Mediterranean and Levant have been civilized for millennia, as have East and South Asia. It seems to me that old civilizations that have survived the test of time have some resistance to feminism and female supremacism written into their cultural DNA. This is probably the case because those that did not have this resistance were invariably conquered and displaced by those that did. The history of the Middle East is one of constant demographic displacement and usurpation, and because it has historically been a land of plenty with a relatively mild climate, it wasn’t the environment or the lack of food that applied the most pressure, but rather other groups of human beings. Therefore, it was those with the strongest culture, religion and society that prevailed.
In places such as Scandinavia, there was certainly human conflict, but more pressing was the matter of filling the storehouse before winter came. Scandinavians have an amazing work ethic, which is obvious when one sees their feats of physical endurance in sailing and rowing ships across the Atlantic, skiing across the mountains in winter, working in stony soil from morning till night, etc. But when it comes to defending their philosophy and culture they are fairly subdued. Words are considered superfluous — a man is supposed to be stoic and get to work to overcome the challenges of the physical world. Admirable, to be sure, but totally insufficient in a complex, pluralistic society.
Ultimately, the macho culture of established civilizations will take hold in the North as well, because feminist rule will destroy the egalitarianism that made the silent beta provider ethic work in the first place. Feminist rule requires a police state, and a police state ruled by women soon becomes a police state ruled by police — it never fails.
...
In the meanwhile, contra Gideon Levy, I would argue that Northern European and Anglo men should learn a lesson from the southern cultures typified by the macho, voluble Mediterranean men, and dispense with the stoic, long-suffering traits that have slowly led us toward a status approaching slavery.
*Sorry, this was the end of the article.
Again fellas, not that we have to agree with everything Mr. Price says, especially the last part about 'macho volubility' regarding 'swarthoids' -- but what he says overall is interesting nonetheless on the cultural evolution of sub-racial behavior, particularly with respect to their relations with women.
In the meanwhile, contra Gideon Levy, I would argue that Northern European and Anglo men should learn a lesson from the southern cultures typified by the macho, voluble Mediterranean men, and dispense with the stoic, long-suffering traits that have slowly led us toward a status approaching slavery.
*This was from the Spearhead article - it was not my words.
In the meanwhile, contra Gideon Levy, I would argue that Northern European and Anglo men should learn a lesson from the southern cultures typified by the macho, voluble Mediterranean men
This false meme keeps being repeated to try and convince us of something that isn't true, much like multiculturalism/multiracialism and equality.
Evola, a Med himself, believed Latins to be more feminine by nature. Being hysterical and lashing out at people with irrational emotion is not masculine, it's feminine.
Look how crazed many become by just modest appeals to Northern European interests. If Nords asserted their identity in significant numbers Jewish and Medish heads would explode. It would be a completely different world and for the better.
This false meme keeps being repeated to try and convince us of something that isn't true, much like
multiculturalism/multiracialism and equality.
Sorry, I tried to post more excerpts from the Spearhead article, but it did not post.
Here are the rest of the pertinent comments I thought interesting (not that I completely agree with the all the author's points) -
In egalitarian Scandinavia, for example, no political candidate has a chance of being elected without committing to feminism. It’s the same as the need to be a Zionist to win an election in Israel. We remain quite far from such a situation regarding feminism. Who is really a feminist here?
Yes, and “egalitarian” Scandinavia now has quotas for women on corporate bords, almost passed a “man tax,” prosecutes johns but not hookers, transfers as much wealth as possible into the hands of women and regularly vilifies men in general, despite Scandinavian men being amongst the most compliant and indulgent toward women on Earth.
...
In places such as Scandinavia, there was certainly human conflict, but more pressing was the matter of filling the storehouse before winter came. Scandinavians have an amazing work ethic, which is obvious when one sees their feats of physical endurance in sailing and rowing ships across the Atlantic, skiing across the mountains in winter, working in stony soil from morning till night, etc. But when it comes to defending their philosophy and culture they are fairly subdued. Words are considered superfluous — a man is supposed to be stoic and get to work to overcome the challenges of the physical world. Admirable, to be sure, but totally insufficient in a complex, pluralistic society.
...because feminist rule will destroy the egalitarianism that made the silent beta provider ethic work in the first place. Feminist rule requires a police state, and a police state ruled by women soon becomes a police state ruled by police — it never fails.
http://tinyurl.com/2brgcc3
Again, not that we have to agree with everything Mr. Price says, especially the last part about 'macho volubility' regarding 'swarthoids' -- but what he says overall is interesting nonetheless on the cultural evolution of sub-racial behavior, particularly with respect to relations with women, and how they could be improved.
Anon - "Prince William is the anti-Christ"
Nah. Hunter Wallace is the anti Christ. And a Papist/Satanist agent of corrupt Britain and Jewry too.
"I would argue that Northern European and Anglo men should learn a lesson from the southern cultures typified by the macho, voluble Mediterranean men, and dispense with the stoic, long-suffering traits that have slowly led us toward a status approaching slavery."
That above comment is mostly wrong, though there is some truth in it. Mediterranean-Catholic nations have always been a bastion of matriarchy, and Meds are quite matricentric like Jews (another subsection of Mediterranean people). After all, Catholics worship Mary and other female idols, often even eschewing Jesus altogether (the water swillers they are).
In Mediterranean Europe it isn't uncommon for men to live at home in to their 30s or even longer to be close to their mama and extended family. Mediterranean countries also have one of the lowest birth-rates in Europe, far below replacement level. Far from being "macho," many Med men in Europe are seen as simpering metrosexuals. Med Europe has a largely depopulated countryside, with most people crammed in to cities with large immigrant populations compared to many Northern Euro cities - I include the UK and most of France as predominately Med...think of the immigrants in London, Paris, Rome, etc. But they (Meds and Jews) are much more voluble than Nords, you are right about that - more talkative and nagging for sure....kind of like women. Just because they can talk fast and a alot doesn't make them better than Nords. Think about all of the technology invented by Northern Euros compared to Med Euros in the past couple hundred years.
It seems that in the USA though many Meds are often more masculine than many Nords, especially the Med converts to Protestantism. It's matriarchal/matricentric Catholicism and modern Judaism that so often serves to emasculate men. Also, just because Meds and Jews talk alot and are often smarter than Nords or more successful in a business sense doesn't make them more masculine, that is solely because of an often corrupt business network of Meds and Jews in the USA (and we all see how that has worked out).
Most of the explorers who opened horizons for the White race around the globe were predominately Nordic, even those from Spain and Portugal. Many of the most prominent Meds in history have almost always had Nordic features such as light eyes, light skin, and light hair.
Also, Nords have almost always been better and more valiant warriors compared to Meds. Think of the toughness of the Germans as opposed to the French in WWII, and so on. Think about how Nords and other Northern Euros in Germany, Eastern Europe, Scotland, etc held off the often corrupt Roman Empire compared to Meds and Southern Europeans. It's the base of primeval hunting-gather-fishing stock (plus a bit of Neanderthal too) which makes Nords physically tougher than Meds, most of whom are of Neolithic farming stock the Near East and Turkey.
But still, I think the strongest combination is a mixture of Nord and Med as you find in Austria, or Southern Germany, many parts of the UK, much of France, and so on.
One thing is for sure though: Meds and Nords have to start working together a whole lot more in the USA and Europe too - we need to stop fiddling while Western civilization burns around us.
The best thing Meds can do for Western civilization is give up Papism and convert to Protestantism instead until the corrupt Catholic Church is reformed.
But still, I think the strongest combination is a mixture of Nord and Med as you find in Austria, or Southern Germany, many parts of the UK, much of France, and so on.
This is bullshit.
The best thing Meds can do for Western civilization is give up Papism and convert to Protestantism instead until the corrupt Catholic Church is reformed.
The best thing Meds can do for Western civilization is to let Nords live and preserve themselves.
The best thing Meds can do for Western civilization is to let Nords live and preserve themselves.
Indeed, and it's the best for them as well, as it is for all ethnic groups. This is the fairest and most sensible way to preserve our respective groups, and I don't see how someone can argue against it except for social predators who want to exploit other groups.
Med men in Europe are seen as simpering metrosexuals
Right, look at the guido type of Jersey Shore fame. Extremely feminine, they spend more time doing their hair and makeup than women.
Contrast that with Nordish "rednecks," who are rather the opposite and masculine.
What the critic means to say is we should be loud, obnoxious, and demanding like Jews and Meds. I don't consider this masculine, however I do agree that Nords should assert their identity more and stop being so concerned with fairness and empathy. Two very positive traits to have, however it only works if the relationship is mutual and not exploitative, and currently it's the latter.
Really?? You really need to ask that? You should take all of that misspent energy attempting to analyze others and look inward. Getting satisfaction from seeing people mass murdered because you were picked on when you were younger is way beyond bitter.
Oh please. "Gained satisfaction" makes it sound like I was popping the champagne. No one gains satisfaction out of seeing his own kind suffer. My point was that out of sheer frustration with the kind of hyperethnocentric bluster which I grew up hearing -- we're the only ones who are ever in the right, the rest of the world's always wrong -- that landed in them in hot water in the first place I couldn't help feeling well you sons of bitches made your bed, now lay in it; the sense of retribution had to do with the assholes who created the mess, not the people as a whole (although, depending on how you look at it, the former could certainly be said to have constituted a sizable majority -- almost rendering my qualification a mute point).
It's clear that your blog comments are really a cry for help.
Okay then, since you're so wise why don't you help me instead of castigate me?
Wherever you find fat women paired with skinny men, there you find matriarchy. You see this often amongst Meds, Jews, and often Blacks too. In those cases the women are draining their men dry of energy and they rule over them.
The writer from that article from the Spearhead is ridiculous if he thinks that Jewish men, especially Ashkenazi one's - does in any way fit the stereotype of 'masculinity'.
What was interesting about the Spearhead article, however, was the very apropos observation that the more Nordic a country is, the more is it not only Feminist, but, like the article says, seems to make a 'religion' of it.
==
In egalitarian Scandinavia, for example, no political candidate has a chance of being elected without committing to feminism. It’s the same as the need to be a Zionist to win an election in Israel. We remain quite far from such a situation regarding feminism. Who is really a feminist here?
Yes, and “egalitarian” Scandinavia now has quotas for women on corporate bords, almost passed a “man tax,” prosecutes johns but not hookers, transfers as much wealth as possible into the hands of women and regularly vilifies men in general, despite Scandinavian men being amongst the most compliant and indulgent toward women on Earth.
http://tinyurl.com/2brgcc3
==
This 'religion of Feminism' has to ultimately be stamped out in Northern Europe - and among their diaspora societies - such as the United States and Australia, for example.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1289391/Julia-Gillard-Theres-Sheila-running-Oz-Shes-feminist--Pom.html
Right, look at the guido type of Jersey Shore fame. Extremely feminine, they spend more time doing their hair and makeup than women.
Agreed - but remember, however, that much of the cast to this silly show is Hispanic (at least partially).
Contrast that with Nordish "rednecks," who are rather the opposite and masculine.
True too, but outside the US (and to a lesser degree Scotland/N.Ireland) this is attitude is not found much at all in the rest of Northern European countries, especially Scandinavia.
This certainly can change, however, as Third World immigrants become more aggressive and hostile in their attitudes with the North Euro native men.
There are energy vampires all over the USA now. Merely being around them makes your blood run cold.
Notice this next time you around certain people - notice how your hands turn ice cold. This is the energy vampires sucking the life force out of you.
Catholicism is feminism. Mediterraneanism is matriarchy.
Catholicism is feminism. Mediterraneanism is matriarchy.
Prove it.
Best seo company in lahore
Hdhub4u
Hdhub4u distributes the latest released films from Hollywood, Bollywood, Kollywood, Mollywood, Tollywood, Punjabi, and other genres
@sirinfamous"males become liberal queers with long blonde hair."
Not like southern Europeans were/are not known for being rabid homosexuals, and the mestizo "med" countries of Chile and Argentina, good one! LOL
Post a Comment